Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:32:10.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE BIOLOGY OF SIMULIUM ARCTICUM MALLOCH IN ALBERTA. PART II. SEASONAL PARITY STRUCTURE AND MERMITHID PARASITISM OF POPULATIONS ATTACKING CATTLE AND FLYING OVER THE ATHABASCA RIVER

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

J.R. Anderson  and
J.A. Shemanchuk
J.R. Anderson
Affiliation:
Division of Entomology and Parasitology, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA94720
J.A. Shemanchuk
Affiliation:
Agriculture Canada Research Station, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada T1J 4B1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Dissections of flies caught attacking cattle and flying over the Athabasca River (14 June through 11 September 1974) revealed two large peaks of nulliparous females and two peaks of parous females. In both cases, peak numbers of nullipars preceded the peaks in pars. A small third cohort emerged in late August, and some nullipars were collected over the river on all sampling dates.

Around cattle, nullipars had two prominent, but brief, peaks, followed by two subsequent prolonged periods when pars were most abundant. Parity of captured females was typical of the expected seasonal pattern of parity for an anautogenous species and corroborated our previous determination of obligate anautogeny of laboratory-reared females.

Females examined for parity status were categorized as being teneral, blood-fed, gravid/ovipositing, or parasitized with a mermithid parasite (Isomermis spp.). Dissection of 2414 flies caught over the river revealed little difference in the infection rates of males and females throughout the season. Mermithids occurred primarily in nulliparous flies of the first generation and retarded the development of the reproductive organs in both sexes. Parasitism did not prevent nulliparous females from mating, nor feeding on carbohydrate or blood. A blood meal actually seemed required for maturation of the mermithid parasite. Blood-engorged females with mermithids were collected both around cattle and flying over the Athabasca River. When parasitized females with digested blood meals joined swarms of ovipositing females, mermithids were returned to the river. Nearly all flies harbored just one worm; of the 1435 parous females examined for parity, only 1 had a small mermithid. By killing flies from which they exited, the worms prevented females from taking a second blood meal.

Although flies were killed by exit of the mermithid, this parasite is ineffective against the major pest species, Simulium arcticum Malloch, because it does not prevent parasitized females from seeking and taking a blood meal and thereby harassing cattle. However, in years when nearly 50% of the emerged adults are parasitized (like 1974), this mermithid may be a principal factor regulating the population density of the S. arcticum population in subsequent years.

Résumé

Des dissections de mouches capturées qui s’attaquent aux bovins et volent au-dessus de la rivière Athabasca (du 14 juin au 11 septembre 1974) ont révélé la présence de deux grands pics de populations de femelles nullipares et de deux pics de femelles primipares ou multipares. Dans les deux cas, le plus grand nombre de nullipares précède le plus grand nombre de primipares ou de multipares. Une troisième population peu nombreuse a émergé à la fin d’août et certaines femelles nullipares ont été récoltées au-dessus de la rivière à toutes les dates d’échantillonnage.

Autour des bovins, les femelles nullipares ont affiché deux pics évidents mais brefs, suivis par des périodes prolongées où les femelles primipares ou multipares ont été les plus abondantes. La parité des femelles capturées a été typique de la tendance de parité saisonnière prévue pour une espèce anautogène et a corroboré notre détermination précédente en faveur de l’autogénie des femelles élevées en laboratoire.

Les femelles examinées pour la parité ont été catégorisées comme ténérales, nourries de sang, gravides/en train de pondre, ou parasitées par un mermithidé (Isomermis spp.). La dissection de 2414 mouches capturées au-dessus de la rivière a révélé peu de différence dans les taux d’infection des mâles et des femelles pendant toute la saison. Les mermithidés se rencontrent principalement chez les mouches nullipares de la première génération et retardent le développement des organes reproducteurs des deux sexes. Le parasitisme n’empêche pas les femelles nullipares de s’accoupler, ni de se nourrir d’hydrates de carbone ou de sang. En réalité, un repas de sang semble nécessaire pour la maturation du parasite mermithidé. Des femelles ayant ingéré du sang et parasitées par des mermithidés ont été récoltées autour des bovins et volant au-dessus de la rivière Athabasca. Lorsque les femelles parasitées ayant digéré un repas de sang rejoignaient des essaims de femelles en train de pondre, les mermithidés étaient retournés à la rivière. Presque toutes les mouches n’hébergeaient qu’un seul ver; parmi les 1435 femelles primipares ou multipares examinées pour la parité, une seule possédait un petit mermithidé. En tuant les mouches desquelles ils émergent, les vers empêchent les femelles de prendre un autre repas de sang.

Même si les mouches sont tuées par l’émergence du mermithidé, ce parasite s’avère inefficace contre la principale espèce de ravageur, Simulium arcticum Malloch, car il n’empêche pas les femelles parasitées de rechercher et de prendre un repas de sang, et donc de harceler les bovins. Mais au cours des années où près de 50% des adultes émergés sont parasités (comme en 1974), ce mermithidé pourrait jouer un rôle important dans la régulation de la densité de la population de S. arcticum au cours des années subséquentes

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 119 , Issue 1 , January 1987 , pp. 29 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J.R., and Shemanchuk, J.A.. 1977. Parity and mermithid parasitism of Simulium arcticum caught attacking cattle and flying over an Alberta River. Proc. 1st Inter-Regional Conf. No. Am. Blackflies, Dixville Notch, New Hampshire. pp. 143–145.Google Scholar
Anderson, J.R., and Shemanchuk, J.A.. 1987. The biology of Simulium arcticum Malloch in Alberta. Part I. Obligate anautogeny in S. arcticum and other black flies (Diptera: Simuliidae). Can. Ent. 119: 21–27.Google Scholar
Cameron, A.E. 1922. The morphology and biology of a Canadian cattle-infesting black fly, Simulium similie Mall. (Diptera, Simuliidae). Can. Dept. Agric. Bull. 5(n.s.): 1–26.Google Scholar
Carlsson, G., and Müller, K.. 1978. Studie zum Lebenscyklus von Simulium morsitans (Dipt., Simuliidae) in Nordsweden. Entomol. Zeit. 88: 6–10.Google Scholar
Carlsson, M., Nilsson, L.M., Svenson, Bj., Ulfstrand, S., and Wotton, R.S.. 1977. Lacustrine seston and other factors influencing the blackflies (Diptera: Simuliidae) inhabiting lake outlets in Swedish Lapland. Oikos 29: 229–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charnetski, W.A., and Haufe, W.O.. 1981. Control of Simulium arcticum Malloch in Northern Alberta, Canada. pp. 117–132 in Laird, M. (Ed.), Blackflies: The Future for Biological Methods in Integrated Control. Academic Press, New York. 399 pp.Google Scholar
Colbo, M.H., and Moorhouse, D.E.. 1979. The ecology of preimaginal Simuliidae (Diptera) in South-East Queensland, Australia. Hydrobiologia 63: 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colbo, M.H., and Porter, G.N.. 1980. Distribution and specificity of Mermithidae (Nematoda) infecting Simuliidae (Diptera) in Newfoundland. Can. J. Zool. 58: 1483–1490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Contant, C.C. 1982. Evidence for upstream dispersion of adult caddisflies (Trichoptera: Hydropsychidae) in the Columbia River. Aq. Insects 4: 61–66.Google Scholar
Davies, D.M. 1958. Some parasites of Canadian black flies (Diptera, Simuliidae). Proc. XV Intern. Congr. Zool. (Lond): 660–661.Google Scholar
Davies, L. 1961. Ecology of two Prosimulium species (Diptera) with reference to their ovarian cycles. Can. Ent. 93: 1113–1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, L. 1963. Seasonal and diurnal changes in the age-composition of adult Simulium venustum Say (Diptera) population near Ottawa. Can. Ent. 95: 654–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Depner, K.R., Charnetski, W.A., and Haufe, W.O.. 1980. Population reduction of the black fly Simulium arcticum at breeding sites in the Athabasca River. pp. 21–37 in Haufe, W.O., and Croome, G.C.R. (Eds.), Control of Black Flies in the Athabasca River. Tech. Rep., Alberta Environment, Pollution Control Division, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 241 pp.Google Scholar
Detinova, T.S. 1962. Age-grouping methods in Diptera of medical importance. Wld. Hlth. Organ., Geneva. 216 pp.Google ScholarPubMed
Detinova, T.S., and Beltiukova, K.N.. 1958. On the repeated gonotrophic cycle of Simuliidae in Krasnoyarsk area. Med. Parazitol. i Parazitarn. Bolezni. 27: 686–688. (In Russian; English translation).Google Scholar
Ezenwa, A.O., and Carter, N.E.. 1975. Influence of multiple infections on sex ratios of mermithid parasites of blackflies. Environ. Ent. 4: 142–144.Google Scholar
Fredeen, F.J.H. 1963. Oviposition in relation to the accumulation of bloodthirsty black flies (Simulium (Gnus) arcticum Mall. (Diptera)) prior to a damaging outbreak. Nature 200(4910): 1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredeen, F.J.H. 1969. Outbreaks of the black fly, Simulium arcticum Malloch in Alberta. Quaest. Ent. 5: 341–372.Google Scholar
Fredeen, F.J.H. 1970. Sexual mosaics in the black fly Simulium arcticum (Diptera: Simuliidae). Can. Ent. 102: 1585–1595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredeen, F.J.H., Rempel, J.G., and Arnason, A.P.. 1951. Egg-laying habits, overwintering stages, and life-cycle of Simulium arcticum Mall. (Diptera: Simuliidae). Can. Ent. 83: 73–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golini, V. 1977. Simuliidae (Diptera) of Rendalen, Norway. III. Females of the Eusimulium rendalense Complex infected with mermithids (Nemotoda). Can. Ent. 109: 755–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, R. 1984. Nematode parasites of blackflies. pp. 821–847 in Nickle, W.R. (Ed.), Plant and Insect Nematodes. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York. 925 pp.Google Scholar
Grunin, K. 1949. A mistake in instinct resulting from parasitic castration in Prosimulium hirtipes (Fries) (Diptera: Simuliidae). Dokl. Akad. Nauk. S.S.S.R. 66: 305–307. (In Russian.) (Rev. App. Ent. (B) 39: 204. 1951.)Google Scholar
Haufe, W.O., and Croome, G.C.R. (Eds.). 1980. Control of black flies in the Athabasca River. Tech. Rep., Alberta Environment, Pollution Control Division, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 241 pp.Google Scholar
Hunter, D.M. 1977. Eclosion and oviposition rhythms in Simulium ornatipes (Diptera: Simuliidae). J. Aust. ent. Soc. 16: 215–220.Google Scholar
Hunter, D.M., and Moorhouse, D.E.. 1976. Sexual mosaics and mermithid parasitism in Austrosimulium bancrofti (Tayl.) (Diptera, Simuliidae). Bull. ent. Res. 65: 549–553.Google Scholar
Mackerras, M.J., and Mackerras, I.M.. 1948. Simuliidae (Diptera) from Queensland. Aust. J. Sci. Res. Ser. B 1: 231–270.Google Scholar
Madsen, B.L., Bengtsson, J., and Butz, I.. 1977. Upstream movement by some Ephemeroptera species. Arch. Hydrobiol. 81: 119–127.Google Scholar
Mokry, J.E., and Finney, J.R.. 1977. Notes on mermithid parasitism of Newfoundland blackflies, with the first record of Neomesomermis flumenalis from adult hosts. Can. J. Zool. 55: 1370–1372.Google Scholar
Molloy, D.P. 1981. Mermithid parasitism of black flies (Diptera: Simuliidae). J. Nematol. 10: 250–256.Google Scholar
Mondet, B., Pendriez, B., and Bernadou, J.. 1976. Etude du parasitisme des simulies (Diptera) par des Mermithidae (Nematoda) en Afrique de l'Ouest. I. Observations préliminaires sur un cours d'eau temporaire de savane. Cah. O.R.S.T.O.M., sér. Ent. Méd. et Parasitol. 14: 141–149.Google Scholar
Mondet, B., Poinar, G.O. Jr., and Bernadou, J.. 1977. Etude du parasitisme des simulies (Diptera: Simuliidae) par des Mermithidae (Nematoda) en Afrique de l'Ouest. IV. Description de Isomermis lairdi n.sp., parasite de Simulium damnosum. Can. J. Zool. 55: 2011–2017.Google Scholar
Mondet, B., Prud'hom, J.M., Bellec, C., and Hebrard, G.. 1980. Etude du parasitisme des simulies (Diptera: Simuliidae) par des Mermithidae (Nematoda) en Afrique de l'Ouest. V. Croissance et sex-ratio de deux espèces parasites d'adultes de Simulium damnosum s.1. Cah. O.R.S.T.O.M. sér. Ent. Méd. et Parasitol. 18: 49–57.Google Scholar
Müller, K. 1954. Investigations on the organic drift in North Swedish streams. Rep. Inst. Freshwater Res. Drottningholm 35: 133–148.Google Scholar
Nickle, W.R. (Ed.). 1984. Plant and insect nematodes. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York. 925 pp.Google Scholar
Peterson, B.V. 1960. Notes on some natural enemies of Utah black flies (Diptera: Simuliidae). Can. Ent. 92: 266–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phelps, R.J., and DeFoliart, G.R.. 1964. Nematode parasitism of Simuliidae. Univ. of Wisconsin, Agric. Expt. Sta. Res. Bull. 245. 78 pp.Google Scholar
Poinar, G.O. Jr., 1977. Empidomermis cozii n.gen., n.sp. (Mermithidae: Nematoda) a parasite of Anopheles funestus (Culicidae: Diptera) in West Africa. Can. J. Zool. 55: 1475–1479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poinar, G.O. Jr., 1983. The natural history of nematodes. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. 323 pp.Google Scholar
Procunier, W.S., Shemanchuk, J.A., and Barr, W.B.. 1984. Cytological identification of Simulium (IIS–10.11) arcticum pest populations from the Athabasca area using larval and adult polytene chromosomes. pp. 37–40in Sears, L.J.L., and Wilson, D.B. (Eds.), Research Highlights—1983. Agriculture Canada Research Station, Lethbridge, Alberta.Google Scholar
Rempel, J.G., and Arnason, A.P.. 1947. An account of three successive outbreaks of the black fly, Simulium arcticum, a serious livestock pest in Saskatchewan. Sci. Agric. 27: 428–445.Google Scholar
Roos, T. 1957. Studies on upstream migration in adult stream-dwelling insects. Rep. Inst. Freshwater Res. Drottningholm 38: 167–193.Google Scholar
Ross, D.H., and Merritt, R.W.. 1978. The larval instars and population dynamics of five species of black flies (Diptera: Simuliidae) and their responses to selected environmental factors. Can. J. Zool. 56: 1633–1642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubtsov, I.A. 1963. On mermithids parasitizing simuliids. Russk. Zool. Zh. 42: 1768–1784. (In Russian; with English summary.)Google Scholar
Rubtsov, I.A. 1971. Protective and mutualistic relationships between the insect and its parasites. Zh. Obshch. Biol. 32: 193–201. (In Russian; English translation.)Google Scholar
Rühm, W. 1970. Investigations of the physiological age of the adults of Boophthora erythrocephala de Geer and some other species of Simuliidae. Zeit. für Parasit. 34: 207–225. (In German; English translation.)Google Scholar
Shemanchuk, J.A. 1978. A bait trap for sampling the feeding populations of blood-sucking Diptera on cattle. Quaest. Ent. 14: 433–439.Google Scholar
Shemanchuk, J.A., and Anderson, J.R.. 1980. Bionomics of biting flies in the agricultural area of central Alberta. pp. 207–214 in Haufe, W.O., and Croome, G.C.R. (Eds.), Control of Black Flies in the Athabasca River. Tech. Rep., Alberta Environment, Pollution Control Division, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 241 pp.Google Scholar
Shipitsina, N.K. 1962. Gonotrophic cycle and age groups of the black flies Gnus cholodkovskii and Simulium reptans v. galeratum near Krasnoyarsk (Siberia). Med. Parazitol. i Parazitarn. Bolezni. 31: 18–29. (In Russian; with English abstract.)Google Scholar
Shipitsina, N.K. 1963. Parasitic infection of simuliids and its effect on ovarian function. Russk. Zool. Zh. 42: 291–294. (In Russian; with English summary.)Google Scholar
Strelkov, A. 1964. Biology of Filipjevimermis singularis sp. nov. found in the Rybinski Reservoir. Vestn. Leningrad. Univ. Ser. Biol. 3.19: 55–69. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Trpis, M. 1969. Parasitical castration of mosquito females by mermithid nematodes. Helminthol. 10: 1–4.Google Scholar
Trpis, M., Haufe, W.O., and Shemanchuk, J.A.. 1968. Mermithid parasites of the mosquito Aedes vexans Meigen in British Columbia. Can. J. Zool. 46: 1077–1079.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welch, H.E. 1964. Mermithid parasites of black flies. Bull. Wld. Hlth. Organ. 31: 857–863.Google Scholar
Welch, H.E. 1965. Entomophilic nematodes. Annu. Rev. Ent. 10: 275–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenk, P. 1976. Koevolution von Übertäger und Parasit bei Simuliiden und Nematoden. Z. Angew. Ent. 82: 38–44.Google Scholar