Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T08:35:29.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL ATTEMPTS BY INTRODUCTIONS AGAINST PEST INSECTS IN THE FIELD IN CANADA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

B. P. Beirne
B. P. Beirne
Affiliation:
Pestology Centre, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This is an analysis of the attempts to colonize at least 208 species of parasites and predators on about 75 species of pest insects in the field in Canada. There was colonization by about 10% of the species that were introduced in totals of under 5,000 individuals, 40% of those introduced in totals of between 5,000 and 31,200, and 78% of those introduced in totals of over 31,200. Indications exist that initial colonizations may be favoured by large releases and by selection of release sites that are semi-isolated and not ecologically complex but that colonizations are hindered when the target species differs taxonomically from the species from which introduced agents originated and when the release site lacks factors needed for introduced agents to survive or when it is subject to potentially-avoidable physical disruptions. There was no evidence that the probability of colonization was increased when the numbers of individuals released were increased by laboratory propagation. About 10% of the attempts were successful from the economic viewpoint. Successes may be overestimated if the influence of causes of coincidental, actual, or supposed changes in pest abundance are overlooked. Most of the successes were by two or more kinds of agents of which at least one attacked species additional to the target pests. Unplanned consequences of colonization have not been sufficiently harmful to warrant precautions to the extent advocated by Turnbull and Chant but are sufficiently potentially dangerous to warrant the restriction of all colonization attempts to biological control experts. It is concluded that most failures were caused by inadequate procedures, rather than by any weaknesses inherent in the method, that those inadequacies can be avoided in the future, and therefore that biological control of pest insects has much unrealized potential for use in Canada.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 107 , Issue 3 , March 1975 , pp. 225 - 236
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beirne, B. P. 1972. The biological control attempt against the European wheat stem sawfly, Cephus pygmaeus (Hymenoptera: Cephidae), in Ontario. Can. Ent. 104: 987–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beirne, B. P. 1973. Influences on the development and evolution of biological control in Canada. Bull. ent. Soc. Can. 5: 85–89.Google Scholar
Beirne, B. P. and Kelleher, J. S.. 1973. Early biological control attempts in Canada. J. ent. Soc. Br. Columb. 70: 39–40.Google Scholar
Bradley, G. A. and Hinks, J. D.. 1968. Ants, aphids, and Jack pine in Manitoba. Can. Ent. 100: 40–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckner, C. H. 1966. The role of vertebrate predators in the biological control of forest insects. A. Rev. Ent. 11: 449–470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeBach, P. 1971. The use of imported natural enemies in insect pest management ecology. Proc. Tall Timbers Conf. on Ecol. Animal Control by Habitat Management 3: 211–233.Google Scholar
DeBach, P. (Ed.). 1964. Biological control of insect pests and weeds. Chapman and Hall, London. 844 pp.Google Scholar
Fields, G. J. and Beirne, B. P.. 1973. Ecology of anthocorid (Hemipt.: Anthocoridae) predators of the pear psylla (Homopt.: Psyllidae) in the Okanagan Valley, British Columbia. J. ent. Soc. Br. Columb. 70: 18–19.Google Scholar
Griffiths, K. J., Rose, A. H., and Bird, F. T.. 1971. Neodiprion sertifer (Geoff.), European pine sawfly (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae). In Biological control programmes against insects and weeds in Canada, 1959–1968. Commonw. Inst. Biol. Control, Trinidad, Tech. Comm. 4: 150–162.Google Scholar
Hikichi, A. 1971. Argyrotaenia velutinana (Walker), red-banded leaf roller (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). In Biological control programmes against insects and weeds in Canada, 1959–1968. Commonw. Inst. Biol. Control, Trinidad, Tech. Comm. 4: 10–11.Google Scholar
Jaques, R. P., LeRoux, E. J., and Paradis, R. O.. 1971. Spilonota ocellana (D. & S.), eye-spotted bud moth (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae). In Biological control programs against insects and weeds in Canada, 1959–1968. Commonw. Inst. Biol. Control, Trinidad, Tech. Comm. 4: 47–48.Google Scholar
LeRoux, E. J. 1971. Biological control attempts on pome fruit (apple and pear) in North America, 1860–1970. Can. Ent. 103: 963–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackauer, M. 1972. Genetic aspects of insect production. Entomophaga 17: 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGugan, B. M. and Coppel, H. C.. 1962. Biological control of forest insects, 1910–1958. In A review of the biological control attempts against insects and weeds in Canada. Commonw. Inst. Biol. Control, Trinidad, Tech. Comm. 2: 35–216.Google Scholar
McLeod, J. H. 1962. Biological control of pests of crops, fruit trees, ornamentals, and weeds in Canada up to 1959. In A review of the biological control attempts against insects and weeds in Canada. Commonw. Inst. Biol. Control, Trinidad, Tech. Comm. 2: 1–33.Google Scholar
McMullen, R. D. 1971. Psylla pyricola Forster, pear psylla (Hemiptera: Psyllidae). In Biological control programs against insects and weeds in Canada, 1959–1968. Commonw. Inst. Biol. Control, Trinidad, Tech. Comm. 4: 33–38.Google Scholar
Munroe, E. G. 1971. Biological control in Canada, 1959–1968: Synopsis. In Biological control programs against insects and weeds in Canada, 1959–1968. Commonw. Inst. Biol. Control, Trinidad, Tech. Comm. 4: 213–255.Google Scholar
Paradis, R. O. and LeRoux, E. J.. 1971. Coleophora malivorella Riley, pistol casebearer (Lepidoptera: Coleophoridae). In Biological control programs against insects and weeds in Canada, 1959–1968. Commonw. Inst. Biol. Control, Trinidad, Tech. Comm. 4: 15–16.Google Scholar
Rubin, A. Y. and Beirne, B. P.. Natural enemies of the European fruit lecanium Lecanium tiliae (Homoptera: Coccidae) in British Columbia. Can. Ent. (in press).Google Scholar
Swan, L. A. 1964. Beneficial insects. Harper and Row, New York. 429 pp.Google Scholar
Syme, P. D. 1971. Rhyacionia buoliana (Schiff.), European pine shoot moth (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae). In Biological control programs against insects and weeds in Canada, 1959–1968. Commonw. Inst. Biol. Control, Trinidad, Tech. Comm. 4: 194–205.Google Scholar
Turnbull, A. L. and Chant, D. A.. 1961. The practice and theory of biological control of insects in Canada. Can. J. Zool. 39: 697–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turnock, W. J. and Muldrew, J. A.. 1971. Pristiphora erichsonii (Hartig), larch sawfly (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae). In Biological control programs against insects and weeds in Canada, 1959–1968. Commonw. Inst. Biol. Control, Trinidad, Tech. Comm. 4: 175–194.Google Scholar
Warren, G. L. 1970. Introduction of the masked shrew to improve control of forest insects in Newfoundland. Proc. Tall Timbers. Conf. on Ecol. Animal Control by Habitat Management 2: 185–203.Google Scholar