Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:29:13.273Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS FOR CONTROLLING THREE SPECIES OF MOTHS IN STORED GRAIN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Wm. H. McGaughey
Affiliation:
U.S. Grain Marketing Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Manhattan, Kansas

Abstract

In laboratory studies, an aqueous suspension of a commercial wettable powder formulation of Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki (strain HD-1) containing at least 25 billion viable spores/g and 16000 International Units of Potency (Trichoplusia ni (Hübner))/mg prevented infestations of Indian meal moths, Plodia interpunctella (Hübner), and almond moths, Cadra cautella (Walker), in corn and wheat at a dose of ca. 120 mg of formulation/kg of grain. Treatment of a 100-mm-deep surface layer was more effective than treatments 33 or 67 mm deep and as effective as treatment of the entire grain mass Lack of uniformity in applying B. thuringiensis to the grain kernels caused a small decrease in effectiveness. Dust and bait formulations at about the same doses were as effective as the suspension, but the bait was undesirable because it supported the development of beetle larvae. The formulation was less effective in controlling the Angoumois grain moth, Sitotroga cerealella (Olivier): doses that gave complete control of the Indian meal moth and the almond moth reduced emergence of adult Angoumois grain moths by only about one-third.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burges, H. D. 1964. Insect pathogens and microbial control of insects in stored products. I. Test with Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner against moths. Mem. hors Ser. Entomophaga, No. 2, pp. 323327.Google Scholar
Burges, H. D. and Hussey, N. W. (Eds.). 1971. Microbial control of insects and mites. Academic Press, New York. 861 pp.Google Scholar
de Barjac, H. and LeMille, F.. 1970. Presence of flagellar antigenic subfactors in serotype 3 of Bacillus thuringiensis. J. invert. Path. 15: 139140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulmage, H. T. 1970. Insecticidal activity of HD-I, a new isolate of Bacillus thuringiensis var. alesti. J. invert. Path. 15: 232239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godavaribai, S., Krishnamurthy, K., and Majumder, S. K.. 1962. Bacterial spores with malathion for controlling Ephestia cautella. Pest Tech. 4: 155158.Google Scholar
Heimpel, A. M. 1967. A critical review of Bacillus thuringiensis var. thuringiensis Berliner and other crystalliferous bacteria. A. Rev. Ent. 12: 287322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunter, D. K. 1970. Pathogenicity of a granulosis virus of the Indian-meal moth. J. invert. Path. 16: 339341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kantack, B. H. 1959. Laboratory studies with Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner and its possible use for control of Plodia interpunctella (Hbn.). J. econ. Ent. 52: 12261227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGaughey, W. H. 1975 a. A granulosis virus for Indian meal moth control in stored wheat and corn. J. econ. Ent. 68: 346348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGaughey, W. H. 1975 b. Compatibility of Bacillus thuringiensis and granulosis virus treatments of stored grain with four grain fumigants. J. invert. Path. 26: 247250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinhaus, E. A. and Bell, C. R.. 1953. The effect of certain microorganisms and antibiotics on stored-grain insects. J. econ. Ent. 46: 582598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Laan, P. A. and Wassink, H. J. M.. 1964. Susceptibility of different species of stored-products moth-larvae to Bacillus thuringiensis. Mem. hors Ser. Entomophaga, No. 2, pp. 315322.Google Scholar
Zettler, J. L., McDonald, L. L., Redlinger, L. M., and Jones, R. D.. 1973. Plodia interpunctella and Cadra cautella resistance in strains to malathion and synergized pyrethrins. J. econ. Ent. 66: 10491050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar