Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:55:44.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ASPECTS OF THE BIOLOGY OF THREE SPECIES OF THE GENUS RHANTUS (COLEOPTERA: DYTISCIDAE) WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE ACOUSTICAL BEHAVIOR OF TWO1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Robert L. Smith
Robert L. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two of three species of the genus Rhantus studied were found to produce sounds while in water. Sound production by both sexes of R. gutticollis and R. binotatus occurs in a behavioral context of emigration, while R. atricolor does not produce waterborne sounds. Elevated temperature, absence of suitable bottom substrate, and high densities were effective stimuli for sound production by’ the two acoustically active species. The sounds were analyzed and a mechanism previously described as being involved in preflight warm-up of the thoracic musculature was found responsible for sound production in water. Possible functions of acoustical behavior are discussed, and new information on some aspects of the habitat ecology and general behavior of adults of the three species is provided.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 105 , Issue 6 , June 1973 , pp. 909 - 919
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, R. D. 1967. Acoustical communication in arthropods. A. Rev. Ent. 12: 495–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, G. J. 1924. Vocal organs in the coleopterous families Dytiscidae, Erotylidae, and Endomychidae. Trans. ent. Soc. Lond. 72: 134–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blunck, H. 1913. Kleine Beiträge zur Kenntnis des Geschlechtslebens und der Metamorphose der Dytisciden. 1. Teil. Colymbetes fuscus L. und Agabus undulatus Schrank. Zool. Anz. 41: 534–546.Google Scholar
Crotch, G. R. 1873. Revision of the Dytiscidae of the United States. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 4: 383–424.Google Scholar
Dudich, E. 1921. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Stridulationsorgane der Käfer. I. Enr. Blätter 17: 136–140, 145–155.Google Scholar
Haskell, P. T. 1957. The influence of flight noise on behavior in the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria (Forsk.). J. Insect Physiol. 1: 52–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, M. G. 1952. Abdominal mechano-receptors in Dytiscus and Locusta. Nature 170: 531–532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, G. H. and Jakinovich, W. Jr., 1970. Feeding behavior of the predaceous diving beetle Cybister fimbriolatus (Say). BioScience 20: 1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leston, D., Pringle, J. W. S., and White, D. C. S.. 1965. Muscular activity during preparation for flight in a beetle. J. exp. Biol. 42: 409–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcu, O. 1936. Über das Zirporgan der Dytisciden. Ent. Blätter 32: 140–144.Google Scholar
Miall, L. C. 1895. The natural history of aquatic insects. Macmillan, New York. pp. 35–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeker, H. 1891. Die Tonapparate der Dytiscidae. Arch. Naturgesch. 57: 105–112.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, N. 1951. The study of instinct. Oxford University Press, London. pp. 25–27.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, J. R. 1959. A note on flight emigrations of water beetles from a temporary pond. Coleopts Bull. 13: 102.Google Scholar