Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T04:11:56.400Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ASPECTS OF MATING, OVIPOSITION, AND FLIGHT IN THE SATIN MOTH, LEUCOMA SALICIS (LEPIDOPTERA: LYMANTRIIDAE)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

T. L. Wagner  and
D. E. Leonard
T. L. Wagner
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Maine, Orono 04469
D. E. Leonard
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Maine, Orono 04469
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mating, oviposition, and flight in the satin moth, Leucoma salicis (L.), were studied in an aspen forest in Maine during 1975 and 1976. Adult eclosion normally occurred between 0800 h (EST) and 2300 h, with males emerging earlier both daily and seasonally. Female calling behavior and mating occurred shortly after sunset on the day of eclosion. Mating lasted ca. 19 h, terminating prior to sunset; low temperatures extended the period of mating. Multiple mating was observed in males and females. Oviposition normally occurred between 1600 and 2330 h. The largest egg masses were the first laid, with sequentially smaller masses laid on following days. Confined females laid an average of 4.6 egg masses containing a total of 650 eggs. Female flight normally followed oviposition of the first egg mass; thereafter, the period of daily flight often preceded oviposition. Male flight started at 0500 h, peaked between 1600 and 2100 h, and ended at 0130 h. Adult longevity under confined field conditions averaged 8.6 days for males and 9.4 days for females.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 111 , Issue 7 , July 1979 , pp. 833 - 840
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ambros, W. 1940. Einige Beobachtungen and Untersuchungen an der Nonne im Jahre 1938. Centralbl. gesamte. Forstwes. 6(7/8): 131–147; (9): 166–169.Google Scholar
Brown, R. C. 1931. Observations on the satin moth and its natural enemies in central Europe. U.S. Dep. Agric. Circ. 176. 19 pp.Google Scholar
Burgess, A. F. and Crossman, S. S.. 1927. The satin moth, a recently introduced pest. U.S. Dep. Agric. Bull. 1469. 22 pp.Google Scholar
Clarke, L. J. and Pardy, K. E.. 1971. Biological control of the satin moth in Newfoundland. Bi-mon. Res. Note Can. Fish. For. 24: 36–37.Google Scholar
Doane, C. C. 1968. Aspects of the mating behavior of the gypsy moth. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 24: 768–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glendenning, R. 1932. The satin moth in British Columbia. Can. Dep. Agric. Pamph. 50, n.s., rev. 3rd ed. 15 pp.Google Scholar
Gotz, B. 1951. Die Sexualduftstoffe an Lepidopteren. Experientia 24: 406–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, G. G. 1975. Extraction and bioassay of female sex pheromone of white-marked tussock moth, Orgyia leucostigma (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Can. Ent. 24: 303–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, T. H., Webber, R. T., and Dowden, P. B.. 1938. Effectiveness of imported insect enemies of the satin moth. U.S. Dep. Agric. Circ. 459. 24 pp.Google Scholar
McLaine, L. S. and Glendenning, R.. 1929. The spread and distribution of the satin moth in British Columbia. 60th A. Rep. ent. Soc. Ont. 1929: 70–73.Google Scholar
Percy, J. E., Gardiner, E. J., and Weatherston, J.. 1971. Studies of physiologically active arthropod secretions. VI. Evidence for a sex pheromone in female Orgyia leucostigma (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Can. Ent. 24: 706–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priesner, E. 1975. Electroantennogram responses to female sex pheromones in five genera of Lymantriidae (Lepidoptera). Z. Naturf. 24: 676–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeks, W. A. and Smith, C. C.. 1956. The satin moth, Stilpnotia salicis (L.), in the Maritime Provinces and observations on its control by parasites and spraying. Can. Ent. 24: 565–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richerson, J. V. and Cameron, E. A.. 1974. Differences in pheromone release and sexual behavior between laboratory-reared and wild gypsy moth adults. Environ. Ent. 24: 475–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richerson, J. V., Cameron, E. A., and Brown, E. A.. 1976. Sexual activity of the gypsy moth. Am. Midl. Nat. 24: 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serafimovski, A. 1972. Biologische und okologische Untersuchungen der Weiderspinner (Stilpnotia salicis L.). Godisnik, Sumarski Institut, Skopje 24: 5–105.Google Scholar