Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:53:33.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Artificial Insemination of Aedes aegypti (L.)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Elden Burcham
Elden Burcham
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Entomology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The technic of artificial insemination of insects offers a possible method for initiating or maintaining colonies of species which do not mate under laboratory conditions, and thus it may be possible to obtain a better understanding of their biology and permit the study of certain disease vectors. The technic might be applied to the study of the heredity of some species; it could be an aid to the taxonomist in the determination of species of questionable category.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 89 , Issue 11 , November 1957 , pp. 494 - 495
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burcham, Elden G., Lea, Arden O., Dimond, John B., and Delong, D. M.. 1956. “Laboratory Rearing Procedures for Aedes aegypti and Culex pipiens.” 7 pp. North Cen. Br. Papers, Wis. Alumni Res. Found., Insecticide Testing Lab., Madison, Wis.Google Scholar
Gottschewski, G. 1937. Künstliche Befruchtung bei Drosophila. Naturwissensch., 25: 650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Richard O. 1953. Studies on the artificial insemination of the mosquito Aedes aegypti (L.). Mosquito News, 13: 145–152.Google Scholar
Omura, Seinosuke. 1936. Artificial insemination of Bombyx mori. Jour. Faculty of Agr. Hokkaido Imp. Uni., 38: 135–150.Google Scholar
Watson, L. R. 1927. Controlled mating of the honeybee. Part 2—How it is accomplished. Am. Bee Jour., 67: 300–302.Google Scholar