Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:22:44.497Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Apple cultivar preferences by Hoplocampa testudinea (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae) in the Annapolis Valley of Nova Scotia, Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2016

Christopher Burgart ,
Neil K. Hillier  and
Suzanne Blatt
Christopher Burgart*
Affiliation:
Acadia University, 15 University Ave, Wolfville, Nova Scotia, B4P 2R6, Canada
Neil K. Hillier
Affiliation:
Acadia University, 15 University Ave, Wolfville, Nova Scotia, B4P 2R6, Canada
Suzanne Blatt
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 32 Main Street, Kentville, Nova Scotia, B4N 1J5, Canada
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The European apple sawfly, Hoplocampa testudinea (Klug) (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae), is an economically important pest in eastern Canada. Growers can experience significant crop losses as management of this species is difficult because it is present during bloom. As a result, management strategies other than pesticides are required for this pest. Eleven commercial and experimental apple (Malus pumila Miller; Rosaceae) cultivars were studied to evaluate host resistance as a potential management strategy. Preferences were determined using field surveys of adult visitation, larval infestation of apples, damage at harvest, behavioural bioassays, and electrophysiological tests. Significant differences in visitation and infestation were observed. H. testudinea preferred “Zestar!”, “s23-06-153”, and “Pinova” over other cultivars examined. Comparison with subsequent larval counts and damage also suggest differential performance of larvae in several cases, irrespective of the adult preference. Y-tube bioassays and electroanntennography results indicate that olfaction plays a role in cultivar discrimination for this species.

Type
Insect Management
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 148 , Issue 6 , December 2016 , pp. 724 - 735
Copyright
© Entomological Society of Canada and Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Subject editor: Chris Bergh

References

Alford, D.V. 1973. Apple sawfly [revised]. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Great Britain). Advisory Leaflet, 13: 1–5.Google Scholar
Bartelt, R., Jones, R.L., and Kulman, H.M. 1982. Evidence for a multicomponent sex pheromone in the yellowheaded spruce sawfly. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 8: 83–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boevé, J. 1996. Chemecology of larvae of the European apple sawfly. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 80: 286–288.Google Scholar
Boevé, J. 1999. Chemical ecology of the European apple sawfly, Hoplocampa testudinea . International Organization for Biological and Integrated Control of Noxious Plants and Animals Bulletin, 22: 15–20.Google Scholar
Boevé, J., Lengweiller, U., Tollsten, L., Dorn, S., and Turlings, T.C.J. 1996. Volatiles emitted by apple fruitlets infested by larvae of the European apple sawfly. Phytochemistry, 42: 373–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, J.B. and Alston, F.H. 1969. Sources of pest resistance in apple cultivars. Report East Malling Research Station for 1968, 56: 159–162.Google Scholar
British Columbia Ministry of Agriculture. 2013. Ambrosia apple [online]. Province of British Columbia. Available from http://www.agf.gov.bc.ca/treefrt/product/ambrosia.htm [accessed 10 February 2014].Google Scholar
Casado, D., Gemeno, C., Avilla, J., and Riba, M. 2006. Day-night and phenological variation of apple tree volatiles and electroantennogram responses in Cydia pomonella (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Environmental Entomology, 35: 258–267.Google Scholar
Chaboussou, F. 1961. La lutte contre l’hoplocampe ou “ver cordonnier” du pommier. Revue de Zoologie Agricole et de Pathologie Végétale, 60: 72–78.Google Scholar
Cosse, A.A., Bartelt, R.J., Weaver, D.K., and Zilkowski, B.W. 2002. Pheromone components of the wheat stem sawfly: identification, electrophysiology, and field bioassay. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 28: 407–423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craig, T.P., Itami, J.K., and Price, P.W. 1988. Plant wound compounds from oviposition scars used in host discrimination by a stem-galling sawfly. Journal of Insect Behaviour, 1: 343–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downes, W. 1944. Recent experimental work on the control of the apple sawfly, Hoplocampa testudinea (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae). Entomological Society of British Columbia Proceedings, 41: 29–30.Google Scholar
E.C. Brown’s Nursery. 2014. Apple (Malus) “September Wonfer [sic] Fuji” September Wonder Fuji Apple from E.C. Brown’s Nursery [online]. E.C. Brown’s Nursery Incorporated. Available from http://www.ecbrownsnursery.biz/index.cfm/fuseaction/plants.plantDetail/plant_id/406/index.htm [accessed 13 March 2014].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampson, C.R., McNew, R., Cline, J., Embree, C., Zandstra, J., and Wilson, K. 2008. Region differences in performance of Canadian-bred apple cultivars and implications for breeding. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 89: 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogmire, H.W. and Miller, S.S. 2005. Relative susceptibility of new apple cultivars to arthropod pests. Horticultural Science, 40: 2071–2075.Google Scholar
Hove, T. and Willem, H. 1977. United States Patent PP04121. US Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.Google Scholar
Hull, L.A., Pfeiffer, D.G., and Biddinger, D.J. 1995. Insects and mites: apple direct pests. In Mid-Atlantic orchard monitoring guide. Edited by H. Hogmire. Plants and Life Science Publishing, Ithaca, New York, United States of America. pp. 5–17.Google Scholar
Janick, J., Goffreda, J.C., and Korban, S.S. 2006. “Co-op 39” (Crimson CrispTM) Apple. HortScience, 41: 465–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judd, G.J.R., Gardiner, M.G.T., DeLury, N.C., and Karg, G. 2005. Reduced antennal sensitivity, behavioural response, and attraction of male codling moths, Cydia pomonella, to their pheromone (E, E)-8, 10-dodecadien-1-ol following various pre-exposure regimes. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 114: 65–78.Google Scholar
Lane, D.W. 2006. US Patent Application 2006012320. US Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.Google Scholar
Miles, H.W. 1932. On the biology of the apple sawfly Hoplocampa testudinea Klug. Annals of Applied Biology, 19: 420–431.Google Scholar
Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. 2011. European apple sawfly. Integrated pest management for apples. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
Orange Pippin. 2014a. Apple – Gala – tasting notes, identification, reviews [online]. Available from http://www.orangepippin.com/apples/gala [accessed 10 February 2014].Google Scholar
Orange Pippin. 2014b. Apple – Pinova – tasting notes, identification, reviews [online]. Available from http://www.orangepippin.com/apples/pinova [accessed 12 March 2014].Google Scholar
Paradis, R.O. 1980. L’hoplocampe des pommes, Hoplocampa testudinea (Klug) (Hymenoptera, Tenthredinidae) au Québec. Phytoprotection, 61: 26–29.Google Scholar
Piesik, D., Weaver, D.K., Runyon, J.B., Buteler, M., Peck, G.E., and Morill, W.L. 2008. Behavioural responses of wheat stem sawflies to wheat volatiles. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 10: 245–253.Google Scholar
Pyenson, L. 1943. A destructive apple sawfly new to North America. Journal of Economic Entomology, 36: 218–221.Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2015. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available from http://www.R-project.org [accessed 18 March 2016].Google Scholar
Roitberg, B. and Prokopy, R.J. 1984. Host discrimination by adult and larval European apple sawflies Hoplocampa testudinea (Klug) (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae). Environmental Entomology, 13: 1000–1003.Google Scholar
Syntech. 2004. Electroantennography: a practical introduction. Syntech, Syntech Original Research Instruments, Hilversum, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Tamošiūnas, R. and Valiuškaitė, A. 2013. The study on temperature sum model for predicting apple sawfly spring emergence and flight intensity in Lithuania. Sodininkystė ir daržininkystė, 32: 23–37.Google Scholar
University of Minnesota. 2010. Zestar description: apples. University of Minnesota. Available from http://mnhardy.umn.edu/varieties/fruit/apples/zestar [accessed 12 February 2014].Google Scholar
Vincent, C. 2011. Management of the European apple sawfly (Hoplocampa testudinea) using a parasitic wasp (Lathrolestes ensator). Available from http://www4.agr.gc.ca/AAFC-AAC/display-afficher.do?id=1296664889042&lang=eng [accessed 29 September 2012].Google Scholar
Vincent, C., Babendreier, D., and Kuhlmann, U. 2002. “Hoplocampa testudinea (Klug)” biological control programmes in Canada, 1981–2000. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Weaver, D.K., Buteler, M., Hofland, M.L., Runyon, J.B., Nansen, C., Talbert, L.E., et al. 2009. Cultivar preferences of ovipositing wheat steam sawflies as influence by the amount of volatile attractant. Journal of Economic Entomology, 102: 1009–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weires, R.W. 1991. European apple sawfly [online]. Available from http://nysipm.cornell.edu/factsheets/treefruit/pests/eas/eas.asp [accessed 18 July 2012].Google Scholar
Wilson, K. 2001. New apple cultivars: Silken [online]. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs. Available from http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/crops/facts/apple_cultivars/silken.htm [accessed 12 February 2014].Google Scholar