Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:29:51.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ANNOTATED LIST OF UROLEUCON (LAMBERSIUS) (HOMOPTERA: APHIDIDAE) OF AMERICA NORTH OF MEXICO, WITH A KEY AND DESCRIPTIONS OF NEW SPECIES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

A.G. Robinson
A.G. Robinson
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A key is given for 29 species in the subgenus Lambersius Olive in America north of Mexico. An annotated list is provided for 22 species, and descriptions for the following 7 new species: Uroleucon (Lambersius) carberriensis n. sp., U. (L.) clydesmithi n. sp., U. (L.) coloradensis n. sp., U. (L.) manitobensis n. sp., U. (L.) nevadensis n. sp., U. (L.) penderum n. sp., and U. (L.) suzannae n. sp. Uroleucon (Lambersius) tissoti (Boudreaux) is declared to be a synonym of U. (L.) luteolum (Williams) and U. (L.) baccharidis (Clarke) as a nomen dubium.

Résumé

On a élaboré une clé pour les 29 espèces du genre Lambersius Olive d’Amérique du nord du Mexique. On fournit une liste commentée de 22 de ces espèces, et une description pour les 7 espèces nouvelles suivantes : Uroleucon (Lambersius) carberriensis n.sp., U. (L.) clydesmithi n.sp., U. (L.) coloradensis n.sp., U. (L.) manitobensis n.sp., U. (L.) nevadensis n.sp., U. (L.) penderum n.sp., et U. (L.) suzannae n.sp. Uroleucon (Lambersius) tissoti (Boudreaux) est déclaré synonyme de U. (L.) luteolum (Williams) et U. (L.) baccharidis (Clarke) devient nomem dubium.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 118 , Issue 6 , June 1986 , pp. 559 - 576
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boudreaux, H.B. 1948. New species of Louisiana Aphididae, and notes on Sanbornia juniperi Pergande. Florida Ent. 31: 96–105.Google Scholar
Clarke, W.T. 1903. A list of California Aphididae. Can. Ent. 35: 247–254.Google Scholar
Eastop, V.F., and Hille Ris Lambers, D.. 1976. Survey of the World's Aphids. Junk, Publishers, The Hague. 573 pp.Google Scholar
Hille Ris Lambers, D. 1966. Notes on California aphids, with descriptions of new genera and new species (Homoptera: Aphididae). Hilgardia 37(15): 569–623.Google Scholar
Hottes, F.C. 1933. Descriptions of Aphididae from Western Colorado. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 46: 1–24.Google Scholar
Hottes, F.C. 1948. Descriptions of the sexual forms of some species of Aphididae. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 61: 29–32.Google Scholar
Hottes, F.C., and Frison, T.H.. 1931. The plant lice, or Aphiidae, of Illinois. Bull. Ill. nat. Hist. Surv. 19: 121–447.Google Scholar
Knowlton, G.F. 1928. Notes on a few species of Macrosiphini (Aphididae) from Utah with descriptions of two new species. Pan.-Pacif. Ent. 5: 79–84.Google Scholar
MacGillivray, M.E. 1968. A review of twelve aphid species described by Edith Patch. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 61: 338–368.Google Scholar
Moran, N. 1982. Host relationships, life cycles, and systematics of aphids of the genus Uroleucon. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. 173 pp.Google Scholar
Moran, N. 1984. The genus Uroleucon (Homoptera: Aphididae) in Michigan: key, host records, biological notes, and descriptions of three new species. J. Kansas ent. Soc. 57: 596–616.Google Scholar
Olive, A.T. 1963. The genus Dactynotus Rafinesque in North Carolina (Homoptera: Aphididae). Misc. Publ. ent. Soc. Am. 4: 31–66.Google Scholar
Olive, A.T. 1965. A new subgenus and two new species of Dactynotus (Homoptera: Aphididae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 58: 284–289.Google Scholar
Olive, A.T. 1967. Two new species of Dactynotus from Canada (Homoptera: Aphididae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 60: 58–62.Google Scholar
Palmer, M.A. 1952. Aphids of the Rocky Mountain Region. Thomas Say Foundation 5. 452 pp.Google Scholar
Richards, W.R. 1972 a. Review of the Solidago-inhabiting aphids in Canada with descriptions of three new species (Homoptera: Aphididae). Can. Ent. 104: 1–34.Google Scholar
Richards, W.R. 1972 b. Dactynotus nodulus, a new Aster-infesting aphid from Ontario (Homoptera: Aphididae). Can. Ent. 104: 897–898.Google Scholar
Robinson, A.G. 1964. A new species of Dactynotus Rafinesque (Homoptera: Aphididae) from Grindelia squarrosa (Pursh) Dunal. Can. Ent. 96: 1330–1332.Google Scholar
Robinson, A.G. 1985. Annotated list of Uroleucon (Uroleucon, Uromelan, Satula) (Homoptera: Aphididae) of America north of Mexico, with keys and descriptions of new species. Can. Ent. 117: 1029–1054.Google Scholar
Smith, C.F., and Knowlton, G.F.. 1937. Macrosiphum aphids infesting Chrysothamnus and Gutierrezia. Can. Ent. 69: 269–272.Google Scholar
Smith, C.F., and Parron, C.S.. 1978. An annotated list of Aphididae (Homoptera) of North America. N.C. agric. Expt. Stn. Tech. Bull. 255. 428 pp.Google Scholar
Soliman, L.B. 1927. A comparative study of the structural characters used in the classification of the genus Macrosiphum of the family Aphididae with special reference to the species found in California. Univ. Calif. Publ. Ent. 4: 89–158.Google Scholar
Swain, A.F. 1919. A synopsis of the Aphididae of California. Univ. Calif. Publ. Tech. Bull. Ent. 3: 1–221.Google Scholar
Thomas, C. 1877. A list of the species of the tribe Aphidini, family Aphididae, found in the United States, which have been heretofore named, with descriptions of some new species. Bull. Ill. State Lab. nat. Hist. 2: 3–16.Google Scholar
Williams, T.A. 1911. The Aphididae of Nebraska. Univ. Stud., Nebraska 10: 1–91.Google Scholar