Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:37:22.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

AN ACTION THRESHOLD FOR CONTROL OF LEPIDOPTEROUS PESTS OF CABBAGE IN PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Andrew P. Dornan ,
Jeff G. Stewart  and
Mark K. Sears
Andrew P. Dornan
Affiliation:
Agriculture Canada Research Station, Box 1210, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada C1A 7M8
Jeff G. Stewart
Affiliation:
Agriculture Canada Research Station, Box 1210, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada C1A 7M8
Mark K. Sears
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Action thresholds for imported cabbageworm, Pieris rapae (L.), diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.), and cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni (Hübner), were evaluated on two cultivars of cabbage, Brassica oleracea var. capitata (L.), in Prince Edward Island. Thresholds were tested on plots of mid-season cabbage, cv. Minicole, and late-season cabbage, cv. Lennox, both grown for fresh market in 1991 and 1992. Management of larval populations at a threshold of 0.25 Cabbage Looper Equivalents (CLE) per plant resulted in yields equal to those obtained with bi-weekly applications or grower treatments. Higher thresholds of 0.50 and 1.0 CLE per plant were not as useful and did’ not consistently result in yields greater than untreated plots. Use of the threshold of 0.25 CLE per plant reduced the number of applications of insecticides by 30% compared with spraying insecticide at bi-weekly intervals from heading to harvest, and 43% compared with management by the grower without regard to insect populations or growth stage of the crop.

Résumé

Les seuils d’efficacité de la Piéride du chou, Pieris rapae (L.), de la Fausse-teigne des crucifères, Plutella xylostella (L.) et de la Fausse-arpenteuse du chou, Trichoplusia ni (Hübner), ont été évalués sur deux cultivars du chou Brassica oleracea var. capitata (L.) dans l’île-du-Prince-Édouard. Les concentrations seuils ont été éprouvées dans des cultures de chou de mi-saison, cv. Minicole, et de fin de saison, cv. Lennox, deux cultures destinées à la mise en marché en 1991 et 1992. Le contrôle des populations de larves à une concentration seuil de 0,25 équivalent de Fausse-arpenteuse du chou (CLE) par plant a donné lieu à des récoltes égales à celles obtenues après arrosage bi-hebdomadaire d’insecticide ou après traitement mis au point par le cultivateur. Les concentrations plus élevées de 0,50 et 1,0 CLE par plant ne se sont pas avérées aussi utiles et n’ont pas toujours donné de meilleures récoltes que celles obtenues dans les cultures non traitées. L’utilisation d’une concentration seuil de 0,25 CLE par plant a réduit le nombre d’applications d’insecticides de 30% par rapport aux traitements par arrosage bi-hebdomadaire d’insecticide entre la sortie de terre et la récolte, et de 43% par rapport aux traitements utilisés par le cultivateur qui ne tiennent compte ni des populations d’insectes, ni du stade de croissance de la récolte.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 126 , Issue 2 , April 1994 , pp. 379 - 387
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous. 1989. Vegetable Crops. Guide to Cultivar Selection and Chemical Pest Control for the Atlantic Provinces 1989. Advisory Committee on Vegetable Crops. Publication No. 1400a. Agdex 250: 51 pp.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1992. Economic Trends. Results from the 1991 Census of Agriculture. P.E.I. Department of Finance 47 (August 1992): 15 pp.Google Scholar
Chalfant, R.B., Denton, W.H., Schuster, D.J., and Workman, R.B.. 1979. Management of cabbage caterpillars in Florida and Georgia by using visual damage thresholds. Journal of Economic Entomology 72: 411–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, G.L. 1972. Economic damage threshold and spray interval for cabbage looper control on cabbage. Journal of Economic Entomology 65: 205–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harcourt, D.G., Backs, R., and Cass, L.M.. 1955. Abundance and relative importance of caterpillars attacking cabbage in eastern Ontario. The Canadian Entomologist 87: 400–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoy, C.W., and Shelton, A.M.. 1987. Feeding response of Artogeia rapae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) and Trichoplusia ni (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to cabbage leaf age. Environmental Entomology 16: 680–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoy, C.W., Shelton, A.M., and Andaloro, J.T.. 1986. Action thresholds for processing cabbage, a short-term solution to a long-term problem. Agricultural Ecosystems and the Environment 16: 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, M.R. (Ed.). 1989. Instruction Manual for Integrated Pest Management in Onions, Carrots, Lettuce, Celery, and Cole Crops. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food. 105 pp.Google Scholar
Morisak, D.J., Simonet, D.E., and Lindquist, R.K.. 1984. Use of action thresholds for management of lepidopterous larval pests of fresh market cabbage. Journal of Economic Entomology 77: 476–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samson, P.R., and Geier, P.W.. 1983. Induction of crop damage by the cabbage white butterfly Pieris rapae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) on cabbage. Protection Ecology 5: 199–234.Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. 1985. SAS Procedures Guide for Personal Computers, Version 6 Edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC. 373 pp.Google Scholar
Sears, M.K., Jacques, R.P., and Laing, J.E.. 1983. Utilization of action thresholds for microbial and chemical control of lepidopterous pests (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae, Pieridae) on cabbage. Journal of Economic Entomology 76: 368–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelton, A.M., Andaloro, J.T., and Barnard, J.. 1982. Effects of cabbage looper, imported cabbageworm, and diamondback moth on fresh market cabbage and processing cabbage. Journal of Economic Entomology 75: 742–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, J.G. 1990. Action thresholds for leaf-feeding insects of broccoli. Agriculture Canada Canadex. Horticultural Crops Publication 252.521: 1 p.Google Scholar