Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T14:23:29.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

AGGREGATION OF SPRUCE BEETLES (COLEOPTERA) TO SEUDENOL AND REPRESSION OF ATTRACTION BY METHYLCYCLOHEXENONE IN ALASKA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Abstract

In tests conducted on the Kenai National Moose Range, Alaska, seudenol and α-pinene attracted more spruce beetles (Dendroctonus rufipennis (Kirby)) than did frontalin and α-pinene, the best previously reported synthetic attractant. Addition of methylcyclohexenone (MCH) to sticky traps baited with spruce logs (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss.) infested with 20 female spruce beetles or to traps treated with seudenol and α-pinene reduced the number of spruce beetles caught by 87% and 99%, respectively. MCH appears to have similar repressive effect on the attraction of spruce beetle populations that differ in their geographic locations and hosts. A total of 179 other scolytids, representing 8 genera and 10 species, were caught by traps; greatest numbers were attracted to treatments containing trans-verbenol and uninfested spruce log sections. Scierus pubescens (Swaine) was recorded from Alaska for the first time. No members of Thanasimus species were caught although they have been consistently present in abundance in similar tests elsewhere.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, B. H. and Kemperman, J. A.. 1974. Spruce beetle effects on a white spruce stand in Alaska. J. For. 72: 423425.Google Scholar
Beckwith, R. C. 1972. Scolytid flight in white spruce stands in Alaska. Can. Ent. 104: 19771983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, J. A. and Dyer, E. D. A.. 1969. Cross attraction between the Douglas-fir beetle (Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopk.) and the spruce beetle (D. obesus (Mann.)). Can. Dep. Agric., For. Biol. Div., Bi-mon. Prog. Rep. 25: 31.Google Scholar
Dyer, E. D. A. 1973. Spruce beetle aggregated by the synthetic pheromone frontalin. Can. J. For. Res. 3: 486494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyer, E. D. A. and Chapman, J. A.. 1971. Attack by the spruce beetle, induced by frontalin of billets with burrowing females. Can. Dep. Fish. For., Bi-mon. Prog. Rep. 27: 1011.Google Scholar
Dyer, E. D. A. and Taylor, D. W.. 1968. Attractiveness of logs containing female spruce beetles, Dendroctonus obesus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Ent. 100: 769776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furniss, M. M. 1972. Bark beetle attractants and repellents, pp. 4448. In Western Forestry and Conservation Association, Proc. West. For. Pest Comm.Google Scholar
Furniss, M. M., Kline, L. N., Schmitz, R. F., and Rudinsky, J. A.. 1972. Tests of three pheromones to induce or disrupt aggregation of Douglas-fir beetles in live trees. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 65: 12271232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furniss, M. M., Daterman, G. E., Kline, L. N., McGregor, M. D., Trostle, G. C., Pettinger, L. F., and Rudinsky, J. A.. 1974. Effectiveness of the Douglas-fir beetle antiaggregative pheromone methyl-cyclohexenone at three concentrations and spacings around felled host trees. Can. Ent. 106: 381392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, A. D. 1909. Practical information on the scolytid beetles of North American forests. I. Bark beetles of the genus Dendroctonus. Bull. U.S. Bur. Ent. 83. 169 pp.Google Scholar
Johnson, N. E. and Furniss, M. M.. 1967. Controlled breeding of the Douglas-fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), from Idaho and coastal Washington. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 60: 3133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keen, F. P. 1952. Insect enemies of western forests. Misc. Publs U.S. Dep. Agric. 273. 280 pp.Google Scholar
Kline, L. N., Schmitz, R. F., Rudinsky, J. A., and Furniss, M. M.. 1974. Repression of spruce beetle (Coleoptera) attraction by methylcyclohexenone in Idaho. Can. Ent. 106: 485491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanier, G. N., Birch, M. C., Schmitz, R. F., and Furniss, M. M.. 1972. Pheromones of Ips pini (Coleoptera: Scolytidae): variation in response among three populations. Can. Ent. 104: 19171923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massey, C. L. and Wygant, N. D.. 1954. Biology and control of the Engelmann spruce beetle in Colorado. Circ. U.S. Dep. Agric. 944. 35 pp.Google Scholar
Nagel, R. H., McComb, D., and Knight, F. B.. 1957. Trap tree method for controlling the Engelmann spruce beetle in Colorado. J. For. 55: 894898.Google Scholar
Pitman, G. B. and Vité, J. P.. 1970. Field response of Dendroctonus pseudotsugae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to synthetic frontalin. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 63: 661664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudinsky, J. A., Furniss, M. M., Kline, L. N., and Schmitz, R. F.. 1972. Attraction and repression of Dendroctonus pseudotsugae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) by three synthetic pheromones in traps in Oregon and Idaho. Can. Ent. 104: 815822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudinsky, J. A., Sartwell, C. Jr., Graves, T. M., and Morgan, M. E.. 1974. Granular formulation of methylcyclohexenone: an antiaggregative pheromone of the Douglas fir and spruce bark beetles (Col., Scolytidae). Z. angew. Ent. 3: 254263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, J. M. and Beckwith, R. C.. 1972. The spruce beetle. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. For. Pest Leafl. 127. 7 pp.Google Scholar
Vité, J. P. and Williamson, D. L.. 1970. Thanasimus dubius; prey preception. J. Insect Physiol. 16: 233239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vité, J. P., Pitman, G. B., Fentiman, A. F. Jr., and Kinzer, G. W.. 1972. 3-methyl-2-cyclohexen-l-ol isolated from Dendroctonus. Naturwissenschaften 10: 469470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, S. L. 1963. A revision of the bark beetle genus Dendroctonus Erichson (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Gt Basin Nat. 23. 117 pp.Google Scholar
Wood, S. L. 1969. New synonymy and records of Platypodidae and Scolytidae (Coleoptera). Gt Basin Nat. 29: 113128.Google Scholar