Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:47:00.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

WITHIN-CROWN DISTRIBUIONS OF MALE AND FEMALE BAGWORM (LEPIDOPTERA: PSYCHIDAE) PUPAE ON JUNIPER AS AFFECTED BY HOST DEFOLIATION1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

David L. Cox
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA40546–0091
Daniel A. Potter
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA40546–0091

Abstract

We examined the within-crown distributions of male and female bagworm, Thyridopteryx ephemeraeformis (Haworth), pupae on Juniperus virginiana L. as a function of prior defoliation. This was to evaluate the hypothesis that the differential movement of females to the upper crown before pupation would be strongest on heavily defoliated trees. Differential stratification of the sexes occurred irrespective of degree of defoliation, and despite the fact that competition, as evidenced by higher mortality of pupae and reduced weight of egg masses, was apparently greatest at the top of moderately and severely defoliated hosts. There was no relationship between height of pupation and risk of parasitism for either sex. Female larvae were ca. 4-fold more likely than males to abandon a low-lying host upon which they had fed and to ascend the trunks of nearby trees before pupating. Enhancement of larval dispersal by females is the most plausible explanation for the stratified distribution of bagworm pupae within trees.

Résumé

Nous avons examiné, la relation entre la distribution intra-cîme des pupes, maies et femelles des pschés, Thyridopteryx ephemeraeformis (Haworth) et la défoliation antérieure sur les Juniperus virginia L. Ceci avait pour but d’évaluer l’hypothèse que l’activité des femelles serait plus intense dans les cîmes les plus défoliées. Les stratifications différentielles des sexes avaient lieu sans tenir compte du degré de défoliation et en dépit du fait que la compétition, mise en évidence par une plus grande mortalité des pupes et par la réduction du poids des œufs, était apparemment plus importante dans les cîmes des hôtes modérements ou sévèrements défoliés. Il n’y avait pas de rapports entre la hauteur des pupes et le risque de parasitisme pour les maies ou les femelles. Il y avait environ quatre fois plus de larves femelles que de maies qui abondonnaient un hôte situé en bas, sur lequel elles s’étaient nourries, et qui montaient le long du tronc des arbres avoisinants avant de devenir pupes. Le besoin des femelles d’accroître la dispersion des larves est l’explication la plus plausible pour la distribution stratifiée des pupes de pschés dans les arbres.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrows, E.M. 1974. Some factors affecting population size of the bagworm, Thyridopteryx ephemeraeformis (Lepidoptera: Psychidae). Environ. Ent. 3: 929932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrows, E.M., and Gordh, G.. 1974. Insect associates of the bagworm moth, Thyridopteryx ephemeraeformis (Lepidoptera:Psychidae), in Kansas. J. Kansas ent. Soc. 47: 156161.Google Scholar
Cox, D.L. 1985. Dispersal strategies of the bagworm, Thyridopteryx ephemeraeformis (Haworth) in a patchy environment. M.S. thesis, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.Google Scholar
Cox, D.L., and Potter, D.A.. 1986. Aerial dispersal behavior of larval bagworms, Thyridopteryx ephemeraeformis (Lepidoptera:Psychidae). Can. Ent. 118: 525535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, D.R. 1964. Bagworm moths of the Western Hemisphere. Bull. U.S. Nat. Mus. 244: 1233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, D.K. 1965. Activity rhythms of lepidopterous defoliators. III. The Douglas-fir tussock moth Orgyia pseudotsugata (McDonnough) (Liparidae). Can. J. Zool. 43: 673681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furniss, R.L., and Carolin, V.M.. 1977. Western Forest Insects. USDA For. Serv. Misc. Publ. 1339. 654 pp.Google Scholar
Gross, S.W., and Fritz, R.S.. 1982. Differential stratification, movement and parasitism of sexes of the bagworm, Thyridopteryx ephemeraeformis on red cedar. Ecol. Ent. 7: 149154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haseman, L. 1912. The evergreen bagworm. Missouri Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 104: 308329.Google Scholar
Kulman, H.M. 1965. Natural control of the bagworm and notes on its status as a forest pest. J. econ. Ent. 58: 863866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lance, D., and Barbosa, P.. 1979. Dispersal of larval Lepidoptera with special reference to forest defoliators. The Biologist 61: 90110.Google Scholar
Luck, R.F., and Dahlsten, D.L.. 1980. Within and between tree variation of live and parasitized Douglas-fir tussock moth, Orygia pseudotsugata (Lepidoptera:Lymantriidae) cocoons on white fir in central California and its implications for sampling. Can. Ent. 112: 231238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManus, M.L. 1973. The role of behavior in the dispersal of newly-hatched gypsy moth larvae. USDA For. Serv. Res. Paper NE-267.Google Scholar
McManus, M.L., and Mason, C.J.. 1983. Determination of the settling velocity and its significance to larval dispersal of the gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Environ. Ent. 12: 270272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, T.G. 1979. Dispersal of early instars of the Douglas-fir tussock moth. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 72: 291297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute. 1982. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Sheppard, R.F., and Stairs, G.R.. 1976. Factors affecting survival of larval and pupal stages of the bagworm, Thyridopteryx ephemeraeformis (Lepidoptera: Psychidae). Can. Ent. 108: 469473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, S.L. 1965. Parasitism in a population of the bagworm (Thyridopteryx ephemeraeformis) Proc. Indiana Acad. Sci. 75: 148.Google Scholar