Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:36:10.551Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using agronomic traits and semiochemical production in winter wheat cultivars to identify suitable trap crops for the wheat stem sawfly

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

Micaela Buteler ,
David K. Weaver ,
Phil L. Bruckner ,
Gregg R. Carlson ,
James E. Berg  and
Peggy F. Lamb
Micaela Buteler*
Affiliation:
Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, 334 Leon Johnson Hall, Bozeman, Montana 59717-3120, United States of America
David K. Weaver
Affiliation:
Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, 334 Leon Johnson Hall, Bozeman, Montana 59717-3120, United States of America
Phil L. Bruckner
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 59717, United States of America
Gregg R. Carlson
Affiliation:
Northern Agricultural Research Center, Montana State University, 3848 Fort Circle, Havre, Montana 59501, United States of America
James E. Berg
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 59717, United States of America
Peggy F. Lamb
Affiliation:
Northern Agricultural Research Center, Montana State University, 3848 Fort Circle, Havre, Montana 59501, United States of America
*
1 Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Trap crops are a plausible control strategy for the wheat stem sawfly (WSS), Cephus cinctus Norton (Hymenoptera: Cephidae), especially in alternate wheat−fallow cropping systems. Identifying the most suitable winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L., Poaceae) cultivars is necessary to further improve the effectiveness of winter wheat trap crops. We compared cultivars suitable for cultivation in Montana to identify those that exhibit the greatest potential as trap crops. To accomplish this we used nine winter wheat cultivars to analyze plant characteristics that influence the oviposition behavior of the WSS: stem height, stem diameter, rate of plant development, and emission of the WSS attractant (Z)-3-hexenyl acetate. Data on sawfly-induced stem cutting collected from these cultivars in field nurseries were analyzed to evaluate the potential of each cultivar to attract sawflies. Based on these criteria, five cultivars with good potential as trap crops are ‘Norstar’, ‘Neeley’, ‘Morgan’, ‘Rampart’, and ‘BigSky’. More data from laboratory preference tests and detailed measurement of semiochemical production from these cultivars are required for selecting optimal cultivars for trap-cropping.

Résumé

Les cultures pièges peuvent constituer une stratégie de lutte intéressante contre la cèphe du blé (WSS), Cephus cinctus Norton (Hymenoptera: Cephidae), particulièrement dans les systèmes d'alternance de culture de blé et de jachère. Il est cependant nécessaire d'identifier les cultivars de blé d'hiver (Triticum aestivum L., Poaceae) les plus adéquats afin d'améliorer davantage l'efficacité des cultures pièges de blé d'hiver. Nous avons comparé les cultivars appropriés pour la culture au Montana afin d'identifier ceux qui présentent le plus fort potentiel comme cultures pièges. Nous avons, par conséquent, analysé les caractéristiques des plantes qui influencent le comportement de ponte des WSS, la hauteur de la tige, le diamètre de la tige, le taux de développement de la plante et l'émission de l'attractif de la WSS, l'acétate de (Z)-3-hexényle, chez neuf cultivars de blé d'hiver. Nous avons aussi analysé les données sur les tiges coupées par les cèphes chez ces cultivars dans des pépinières de terrain afin d'évaluer le potentiel d'attraction de chaque cultivar pour les cèphes. D’après ces critères, cinq cultivars présentent un potentiel intéressant comme cultures pièges, ce sont ‘Norstar’, ‘Neely’, ‘Morgan’, ‘Rampart’ et BigSky’. Il faudra faire des tests de préférence additionnels en laboratoire et mesurer avec précision la production de substances sémiochimiques pour pouvoir sélectionner les cultivars les plus appropriés pour les cultures pièges.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 142 , Issue 3 , June 2010 , pp. 222 - 233
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainslie, C.N. 1920. The western grass-stem sawfly. United States Department of Agriculture. Bulletin 841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ainslie, C.N. 1929. The western grass-stem sawfly – a pest of small grains. United States Department of Agriculture Bulletin 157.Google Scholar
Berg, J.E., Bruckner, P.L., Carlson, G.R., Dyer, A., Eckoff, J., Kushnak, G.D., et al. 2006. Winter wheat variety performance summary in Montana [online]. Available from http://plantsciences.montana.edu/crops/2006data/06WWBulletin.pdf (accessed 27 February 2007).Google Scholar
Buteler, M., Weaver, D.K., and Peterson, R.K. 2009. Oviposition behavior of the wheat stem sawfly when encountering plants infested with cryptic conspecifics. Environmental Entomology, 38: 1707–1715. PMID:20021767 doi:10.1603/022.038.0624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Callenbach, J.A., and Hansmeier, M.P. 1945. Wheat stem sawfly control. Montana Extension Service in Agriculture and Home Economics Circular 164.Google Scholar
Cárcamo, H.A., Floate, K.D., Lee, B.L., Beres, B.L., and Clarke, F.R. 2008. Developmental instability in a stem-mining sawfly: can fluctuating asymmetry detect plant host stress in a model system? Oecologia, 156: 505–513. doi:10.1007/s00442-008-1009-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farstad, C. 1940. The development of the western wheat stem sawfly Cephus cinctus (Norton) in various host plants as an index of resistance. Ph.D. dissertation, Iowa State College, Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar
Hokkanen, H.M.T. 1991. Trap cropping in pest management. Annual Review of Entomology, 36: 119–138. doi:10.1146/annurev.en.36.010191.001003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, N.D., and Peterson, L.K. 1956. Oviposition and survival of the wheat stem sawfly Cephus cinctus Norton (Hymenoptera: Cephidae), in various hosts. In Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of Entomology. Montréal, Quebec, 17–25 August 1956. Edited by Becker, E.C.. Mortimer Limited, Ottawa, Ont. p. 459.Google Scholar
Holmes, N.D., and Peterson, L.K. 1960. The influence of the host on oviposition by the wheat stem sawfly, Cephus cinctus Norton (Hymenoptera: Cephidae). Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 40: 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanning, S.P., Carlson, G.R., Eckhoff, J., Kushnak, G.D., Kephart, K.D., Stougaard, R.N., et al. 2006. Spring wheat variety performance summary in Montana [online]. Available from http://plantsciences.montana.edu/crops/2007data/SW07bulletin.pdf (accessed 27 February 2007).Google Scholar
Littell, R.C., Milliken, G.A.M., Stroup, W.W., Wolfinger, R.D., and Schabenberger, O. 2006. SAS for mixed models. 2nd ed. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.Google Scholar
McNeal, F.H., Lebsock, K.L., Luginbill, P. Jr., and Noble, W.B. 1957. Segregation for stem solidness in crosses of Rescue and four Portuguese wheats. Agronomy Journal, 49: 246–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrill, W.L., and Kushnak, G.D. 1999. Planting date influence on the wheat stem sawfly (Hymenoptera: Cephidae) in spring wheat. Journal of Agricultural Entomology, 16: 123–128.Google Scholar
Morrill, W.L., Gabor, J.W., Hockett, E., and Kushnak, G.D. 1992. Wheat stem sawfly (Hymenoptera: Cephidae) damage and detection. Journal of Economic Entomology, 85: 2008–011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrill, W.L., Weaver, D.K., and Johnson, G.D. 2001. Trap strip and field border modification for management of the wheat stem sawfly Cephus cinctus Norton (Hymenoptera: Cephidae). Journal of Entomological Science, 36: 34–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Painter, R.H. 1953. The wheat stem sawfly in Kansas. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science, 56: 432–434. doi:10.2307/3625625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez-Mendoza, J., Weaver, K.D., and Morrill, W.L. 2006. Infestation of wheat and downy brome grass by wheat stem sawfly and subsequent larval performance. Environmental Entomology, 35: 1279–1285. doi:10.1603/0046-225X(2006)35[1279:IOWADB]2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piesik, D., Weaver, D.K., Runyon, J.B., Buteler, M., Peck, G.E., and Morrill, W.L. 2008. Behavioural responses of wheat stem sawflies to wheat volatiles. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 10: 245–253. doi:10.1111/j.1461-9563.2008.00380.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. 1998. SAS. Version 7 for Windows. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.Google Scholar
Seamans, H. 1928. The value of trap crops in the control of the wheat stem sawfly in Alberta. Annual Report of the Entomological Society of Ontario, 59: 59–64.Google Scholar
Shelton, A.M., and Badenes-Perez, F.R. 2006. Concepts and application of trap cropping in pest management. Annual Review of Entomology, 51: 285–308. PMID:16332213 doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.150959.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherman, J.D., Weaver, D.K., Hofland, M.L., Buteler, M., Lanning, S.P., Naruoka, Y., Blake, N.K., Martin, J.M., Lamb, P., Carlson, G.R., and Talbert, L.E. 2010. Quantitative trait loci associated with host plant attractiveness to female wheat stem sawflies. Crop Science, 50: 73–86. doi:10.2135/cropsci2009.03.0145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2006. Montana wheat varieties 2006 [online]. Available from http://wbc.agr.mt.gov/Producers/Variety_releases/wheatvarietiesformt06.pdf (accessed August 2009).Google Scholar
Wall, A., 1952. The diameter of the wheat stem in relation to length and sex of emerging sawfly (Cephus cinctus) Norton. Scientific Agriculture, 32: 272–277.Google Scholar
Weaver, D.K., Sing, S.E., Runyon, J.B., and Morrill, W.L. 2004. Potential impact of cultural practices on wheat stem sawfly (Hymenoptera: Cephidae) and associated parasitoids. Journal of Agricultural and Urban Entomology, 21: 271–287.Google Scholar
Weaver, D.K., Buteler, M., Hofland, M.L., Runyon, J.B., Nansen, C., Talbert, L.E., and Carlson, G.R. 2009. Cultivar preferences of ovipositing wheat stem sawflies as influenced by the amount of volatile attractant. Journal of Economic Entomology, 102: 1009–1017. PMID:19610414 doi:10.1603/029.102.0320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zadoks, J.C., Chang, T.T., and Konsak, C.F. 1974. A decimal code for growth stages of cereals. Weed Research, 14: 15–21. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3180.1974.tb01084.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar