Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T17:37:52.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THYMELICUS LINEOLA (LEPIDOPTERA: HESPERIIDAE) AND ITS PARASITES IN EUROPE1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

K. P. Carl
K. P. Carl
Affiliation:
Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control, European Station, Delémont, Switzerland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The distribution, ecology, and host-plants of the European skipper, Thymelicus lineola (Ochs.), are described, and notes given on its biology and abundance in continental Europe. Agricultural practices are responsible for its virtual absence from hay-fields; however, even in undisturbed wild host-plant communities, it is never abundant, and has never required control measures as in Canada. Parasites of T. lineola are listed, with notes on their life-histories, distribution, host spectra, relative abundance, annual fluctuations, and interpopulation variations. Parasites reared were Phryxe vulgaris Fall., Thecocarcelia incedens Rond, (both attacking larvae, but sometimes emerging after host pupation), Rogas tristis Wesm. (larval parasite), Labrorychus delarvatus Grav. (larval–pupal parasite), Stenichneumon scutellator Grav. and Brachymeria intermedia Nees (pupal parasites); an undetermined mermithid was reared from larvae and also once from an adult S. scutellator. Rogas tristis was attacked by the hyperparasite Mesochorus macrurus Thoms., and S. scutellator by Gelis cursitans F. Potentialities of the more important species for biological control of T. lineola in Canada are discussed. S. scutellator, which is well synchronized with the host, regularly parasitizes 30–50% of pupae and is the most promising natural enemy for introduction, although in Canada it will compete with the native Itoplectis conquisitor (Say). R. tristis (3–57% parasitism) and P. vulgaris (8–44%), with high constancy in Europe, might be considered for introduction to Canada because of the absence there of effective native larval parasites. T. incedens, although probably a specific hesperiid parasite, is uncommon (usually 1–5% parasitism) and has low constancy in central Europe. All other species encountered are rare on T. lineola. Comparison of parasite complexes in Europe and Canada, where the host has acquired 22 natural enemies, shows that four genera are represented in both areas; of three holarctic species two have been found associated with T. lineola only in Canada, and one only in Europe.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 100 , Issue 8 , August 1968 , pp. 785 - 801
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, H. W., Holloway, J. K., and Haeussler, G. J.. 1940. Importation, rearing and colonization of parasites of the oriental fruit moth. Circ. U.S. Dep. Agric., NO. 561.Google Scholar
Arthur, A. P. 1962. Thymelicus lineola (Ochs.) (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae), and its parasites in Ontario. Can. Ent. 94: 1082–1089.Google Scholar
Arthur, A. P. 1966. The present status of the introduced skipper, Thymelicus lineola (Ochs.) (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae), in North America and possible methods of control. Can. Ent. 98: 622–426.Google Scholar
Bergmann, A. 1951–1955. Die Grossschmetterlinge Mitteldeutschlands I–V, Urania Verlag, Jena.Google Scholar
Braun Blanquet, H. 1951. Pflanzensoziologie, 2nd ed. Springer Verlag, Vienna.Google Scholar
DeBach, P., and Schlinger, E. J. (eds.). 1964. Biological control of insect pests and weeds. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
Herting, B. 1960. Biologie der westpalaearktischen Raupenfliegen, Dipt., Tachinidae. Monogrn angew. Ent. 16: 1–188.Google Scholar
Kauffmann, G. 1951. Die Hesperiidae der Schweiz. Mitt. schweiz. ent. Ges. 24: 329–376.Google Scholar
Koch, M. 1956. Wir bestimmen Schmetterlinge. 2nd ed. Neumann Verlag, Radebeul and Berlin.Google Scholar
Pengelly, D. H. 1961. Thymelicus lineola (Ochs.) (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) a pest of hay and pasture grasses in southern Ontario. Proc. ent. Soc. Ont. 91: 189–196.Google Scholar
Pschorn-Walcher, H. 1963. Historisch-biogeographische Rückschlüsse aus Wirt-Parasite-Associationen bei Insekten. Z. angew. Ent. 51: 208–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasnytsin, A. P. 1959. Hibernation sites of Ichneumon flies (Hym., Ichneumonidae). Ent. Obozr. 38: 546–553. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Saunders, W. E. 1916. European butterfly found at London, Ontario. Ottawa Nut. 30: 116.Google Scholar
Schmiedeknecht, O. 1928–1930. Opuscula Ichneumonologica, Suppl. Ichneumoninae, Selbst-verlag, Blankenburg/Thür.Google Scholar
Stokoe, W. J. 1950. The caterpillars of British butterflies. Warne & Co. Ltd., London and New York.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. R. 1943–1958. A catalogue of the parasites and predators of insect pests. Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control, Ottawa and Belleville, Ont.Google Scholar
Vorbrodt, K. 1911–1927. Die Schmetterlinge der Schweiz. Vol. I with Suppl. I–IV, Bern.Google Scholar
Zwölfer, H. 1961. A comparative analysis of the parasite complexes of the European fir budworm, Choristoneura murinana Hb. and the North American spruce budworm, C. fumiferana (Clem.). Tech. Bull. Commonw. Inst. biol. Control 1: 1–162.Google Scholar