Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T08:13:30.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE THORACIC MECHANISM OF THE MILKWEED BUG, ONCOPELTUS FASCIATUS (HETEROPTERA: LYGAEIDAE)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

C. K. Govind  and
J. W. T. Dandy
C. K. Govind
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg
J. W. T. Dandy
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An illustrated account of the thoracic mechanism of the milkweed bug, Oncopeltus fasciatus (Dallas), is given. The thoracic skeleton including legs and wings is described and this is followed by a discussion of the interaction of these parts with the musculature. The action of the extrinsic and intrinsic leg muscles, being well known, is tabled as are also the origins and insertions of all the thoracic muscles.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 102 , Issue 9 , September 1970 , pp. 1057 - 1074
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akbar, S. S. 1957. The morphology and life history of Leptocorisa varicornis Fabr. (Coreidae, Hemiptera) — a pest of the paddy crops in India. 1: Head and thorax. Aligarh Musl. Univ. Publs (Zool. Ser.) Ind. Ins. Type No. 5, 53 pp.Google Scholar
Barber, S. B., and Pringle, J. W. S.. 1966. Functional aspects of flight in belostomatid bugs (Heteroptera). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. (B) 164: 21–39.Google Scholar
Boettiger, E. G., and Furshpan, E.. 1952. The mechanics of fight movements in Diptera. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 102: 200–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dingle, H. 1961. Flight and swimming reflexes in giant water bugs. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 121: 117–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Govind, C. K., and Burton, A. J.. 1970. Flight orientation in a coreid squash bug (Heteroptera). Can. Ent. 102: 1002–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoke, S. 1926. Preliminary paper on the wing venation of the Hemiptera (Heteroptera). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 19: 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, A. S. 1957. The nervous system of the milkweed bug, Oncopeltus fasciatus (Dallas) (Heteroptera – Lygaeidae). Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 83: 119–183.Google Scholar
Larsen, O. 1942. Bisher unbeachtete wichtige Zuge im Bau des Metathorax bei den Heteropteren. K. fysiog. Sällsk. Lund Förh. 12(13): 1–15.Google Scholar
Larsen, O. 1945 a. Der Thorax der Heteropteren. Skellet und Muskulatur. Lunds Univ. Årsskrift., N.F., Adv. 2, 41(3), 96 pp.Google Scholar
Larsen, O. 1945 b. Der Thorakale Skelletmuskelsystem der Heteropteren. Ein Beitrag zur vergleichenden Morphologie des Insektenthorax. Lunds Univ. Årsskrift, N.F., Avd. 2, 41(11), 83 pp.Google Scholar
Larsen, O. 1950. Die Veränderungen im Bau der Heteropteren bei der Reduktion des Flugapparates. Opusc. ent. 15: 17–51.Google Scholar
Lauck, D. R. 1959. The locomotion of Lethocerus (Hemiptera, Belostomatidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 52: 93–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malouf, N. S. R. 1932. The skeletal motor mechanism of the thorax of the “stink bug” Nezara viridula L. Bull. Soc. R. ent. Egypte 16: 161–203.Google Scholar
McCann, F. V., and Boettiger, E. G.. 1961. The electrophysiology of fibrillar fight muscle. J. gen. Physiol. 45: 125–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nachtigall, W. 1969. Elektrophysiologische und kinematische Untersuchungen über Start und Stop des Flugmotors von Fliegen. Z. vergl. Physiol. 61: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nachtigall, W., and Wilson, D. M.. 1967. Neuromuscular control of dipteran fight. J. exp. Biol. 47: 77–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, M. C. 1960. Skeleton and musculature of the thorax of Gelastocris oculatus (Fabricius) (Hemiptera-Heteroptera). Bull. Mus. comp. Zool. Harv. 122(7): 299–357.Google Scholar
Pringle, J. W. S. 1965. Locomotion: flight, Vol. II, pp. 283–329. In: Rockstein, M. (Ed.), The physiology of insecta. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Pringle, J. W. S. 1968. Comparative physiology of the flight motor, Vol. 5, pp. 163–227. In: Beament, J. W. L., Treherne, J. E. and Wigglesworth, V. B. (Eds.), Advances in insect physiology. Academic Press, London and New York.Google Scholar
Rawat, B. L. 1939. Notes on the anatomy of Naucoris cimicoides L. (Hemiptera–Heteroptera). Zool. Jb. (Anat.) 65: 535–600.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, R. E. 1927. Morphology and mechanism of the insect thorax. Smithson. misc. Collns 80(1): 1–108.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, R. E. 1935. Principles of insect morphology. McGraw Hill, New York and London.Google Scholar
Tanaka, T. 1926. Homologies of the wing veins of the Hemiptera. Annot. Zool. Jap. 11: 33–57.Google Scholar
Weber, H. 1930. Biologie der Hemipteren. Eine Naturgeschichte der Schnabelkerfe. Springer. Berlin.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. M. 1962. Bifunctional muscles in the thorax of grasshoppers. J. exp. Biol. 39: 669–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. M. 1968. The nervous control of insect flight and related behaviour, Vol. 5, pp. 289–338. In: Beament, J. W. L., Treherne, J. E. and Wigglesworth, V. B. (Eds.), Advances in insect physiology. Academic Press, London and New York.Google Scholar