Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:46:31.031Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

TEMPORAL PATTERNS OF PUPATION AND EMERGENCE IN THE MOSQUITO CULISETA INORNAT A (DIPTERA: CULICIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Donald R. Barnard  and
Mir S. Mulla
Donald R. Barnard
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, California 92521
Mir S. Mulla
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, California 92521
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The diel periodicity of pupation and emergence was studied in Culiseta inornata (Williston) under field conditions in the Lower Sonoran Desert of southern California. Floating isolation units were employed for observation of these two phenomena over an 8-day study period. Both male and female pharate pupae exhibited a diel periodicity of pupation. Two daily modes were apparent for this process; the first, of lesser amplitude at around 0400 h, and the second, main peak, near 1600 h daily (sunrise: 0635 h, sunset: 1559 h). Distinct diel periodicity of emergence was evident for both males and females of Cs. inornata, with the peak more pronounced for females. For both sexes, a single combined peak of emergence activity occurred daily at around 1600 h.

The diel periodicity of emergence correlated significantly with fluctuations in water temperature. Other environmental conditions such as solar radiation, cloud cover, windspeed, and air temperature exerted no observable effect on pupation and emergence activity.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 109 , Issue 10 , October 1977 , pp. 1387 - 1392
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Corbet, P. S. 1964. Temporal patterns of emergence in aquatic insects. Can. Ent. 96: 265–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbet, P. S. 1966. Diel patterns of mosquito activity in a high artic locality: Hazen Camp, Ellesmere Island, N.W.T. Can. Ent. 98: 1238–1251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fanara, D. M. and Mulla, M. S.. 1974. Population dynamics of larvae of Culex tarsalis Coquillett and Culiseta inornata (Williston) as related to flooding and temperature of ponds. Mosquito News 34: 98–104.Google Scholar
Goma, L. K. H. 1959. Periodic pupation in Anopheles gambiae Giles. J. ent. Soc. S. Afr. 22: 267–276.Google Scholar
Haddow, A.J., Gillett, J. D., and Corbet, P. S.. 1959. Laboratory observations on pupation and emergence in the mosquito Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti (L.). Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 53: 123–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, M. D. R. and Reiter, P.. 1975. Entrainment of the pupation and adult activity rhythms during development in the mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Nature, Lond. 254: 242–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lamborn, W. A. 1922. The bionomics of some Malayan anophelines. Bull. ent. Res. 13: 129–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, N. C. and Waddell, A. B.. 1961. Diurnal variation in the emergence of some aquatic insects. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 113: 123–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulla, M. S., Darwazeh, H. A., and Norland, R. L.. 1974. Insect growth regulators: Evaluation procedures and activity against mosquitoes. J. econ. Ent. 67: 329–332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nayar, J. K. 1967. Pupation rhythm in Aedes taeniorhynchus (Wiedemann). II. Ontogenetic timing, rate of development and endogenous diurnal rhythm of pupation. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 60: 946–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nayar, J. K. 1968. Biology of Culex nigripalpus Theobald (Diptera:Culicidae). I. Effects of rearing conditions on growth and the diurnal rhythm of pupation and emergence. J. med. Ent. 5: 39–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nayar, J. K. and Sauerman, D. M.. 1970. A comparative study of growth and development of Florida mosquitoes. I. Effects of environmental factors on ontogenetic timings, endogenous diurnal rhythms and synchrony of pupation and emergence. J. med. Ent. 7: 163–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, E. T. and Haeger, J. S.. 1954. Pupation and emergence in Aedes taeniorhynchus. Bull. ent. Res. 45: 757–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Provost, M. J. and Lum, R. T. M.. 1967. The pupation rhythm in Aedes taeniorhynchus (Diptera: Culicidae). I. Introduction. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 60: 138–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reiter, P. and Jones, M. D. R.. 1975. An eclosion timing mechanism in the mosquito Anopheles gambiae. J. Ent. (A) 50: 161–168.Google Scholar
Remmert, H. 1965. Über den Tagesthythmus arktischer Tiere. Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere 55: 142–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, P. 1935. Observations on the emergence of anophelines. Rec. Malaria Surv. (India) 5: 159–171.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G.. 1967. Statistical methods. The Iowa State University Press, Ames.Google Scholar
Trpis, M., McClelland, G. A. H., Gillett, J. D., Teesdale, C., and Rao, T. R.. 1973. Diel periodicity in the landing of Aedes aegypti on man. Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 48: 623–629.Google ScholarPubMed
Williams, C. B. 1939. The use of logarithms in the interpretation of certain entomological problems. Ann. appl. Biol. 24: 404–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar