Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:38:34.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SYNOPSIS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN PHILAENINI (RHYNCHOTA: HOMOPTERA: CERCOPIDAE) WITH A NEW GENUS AND FOUR NEW SPECIES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

K.G.A. Hamilton
K.G.A. Hamilton
Affiliation:
Biosystematics Research Institute, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa K1A 0C6
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Keys are provided to the five genera and 12 species of Philaenini in North America. Philaenus (Stål) is redefined to include only two species, one of which, spumarius L., 1758 (= rubra Capanni, 1894, = aurata Capanni, 1894, new synonymies) is represented in North America by three introduced subspecies: quadrimaculatus (Sch.) in eastern and western continental America, spumarius s.s. in Newfoundland, and tesselatus (Mel.) from one locality in southern Ontario. Philaenus parallels Stearns is removed to Paraphilaenus Vilb. as its sole Nearctic representative (new combination) and Philaenus lineatus (L.) belongs to the distinctive genus Neophilaenus Hpt. Philaronia Ball is represented in North America by five species: abjecta (Uhl.), canadensis (Wal.), fuscovaria (Stål) new combination, pauca n. sp. and superba n. sp. Philaenarcys new genus includes three species: bilineata (Say), 1831, new combination (= Ptyelus basivitta Wlk., 1851, new synonymy), killa n. sp., and spartina n. sp.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 111 , Issue 2 , February 1979 , pp. 127 - 141
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, C.F. 1897. Notes on Philaenus. Can. Ent. 29: 111–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, E.D. 1898. A review of the Cercopidae of North America north of Mexico. Proc. Iowa Acad. Sci. 6: 204–226.Google Scholar
Ball, E.D. 1919. Notes on the Cercopidae with descriptions of some new species. Proc. Iowa Acad. Sci. 26: 143–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, E.D. 1934. Notes on Philaenus abjecta Uhler (Homoptera: Cercopidae). Proc. biol. Soc. Wash. 47: 113.Google Scholar
Barber, G. W. and Ellis, W.O.. 1922. Eggs of three Cercopidae. Psyche, Camb. 29: 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capanni, D.V. 1894. I Cercopidi. Mem. Pontifica Accad. Nuovi Lincei 10: 286–300.Google Scholar
Cobelli, R. 1909. Appendice alle Cicadine del Trentino. Pubbl. Mus. civ. Roveredo 46: 1–19.Google Scholar
Costa, O.G. 1834. Prospectus familiae Cicadarum …: 81–90.Google Scholar
Costa, O.G. 1836. Fauna del Regno di Napoli …: 1–16.Google Scholar
de Bergevin, E. 1913. Liste des Hémiptères capturés lors de l'Excursion faite par la Société à Zeralda, le avril 13 1913. Bull Soc. Hist. nat. Afr. N. 5: 94–99.Google Scholar
DeLong, D.M. and Severin, H.H P.. 1950. Spittle-insect vectors of Pierce's disease virus. I. Characters, distribution and food plants. Hilgardia 19: 339–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Geer, C. 1773. Des Cigales. Mémoires pour servir à l'Histoire des Insectes 3(5): 158–228.Google Scholar
Doering, K.C. 1930. Synopsis of the family Cercopidae (Homoptera) in North America. J. Kans. ent. Soc. 3(3–4): 53–64, 81–108.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J.C. 1775. Ryngota. Systema Entomologiae … 832 pp.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J.C. 1781. Ryngota. Species Insectorum … 2. 517 pp.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J.C. 1787. Ryngota. Mantissa Insectorum … 2. 382 pp.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J.C. 1794. Ryngota. Entomologia Systematica Emendata et Aucta … 4. 472 pp.Google Scholar
Fallén, C.F. 1805. Forsok till de Svenska Cicad-Artenas uppstàllning och beskrifning. K. Svenska VetenskAkad. Handl. (2) 26: 229–253.Google Scholar
Fallén, C.F. 1826. Cicadariae, earumque Familiae, affines. Hemiptera Sveciae 2. 80 pp.Google Scholar
Germar, E.F. 1821. Bemerkungen über einige Gattungen der Cicadarien. Mag. Ent. 4: 1–106.Google Scholar
Gmelin, J.F. 1790. Classis V. Insecta. Caroli a Linné Systema Naturae, 1(4): 1517–2224.Google Scholar
Goding, F.W. 1895. Synopsis of the subfamilies and genera of the North American Cercopidae… Bull. Ill. St. Lab. nat. Hist. 3: 483–501.Google Scholar
Halkka, O., Halkka, L., Raatikainen, M., and Hovinen, R.. 1973. The genetic basis of balanced polymorphism in Philaenus (Homoptera). Hereditas 74: 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haupt, H. 1911. Neues und Kritisches über Arten und Varietäten einheimischer Homoptera. Berl. ent. Z. 56: 177–196.Google Scholar
Haupt, H. 1917. Neue paläarktische Homoptera nebst Bermerkungen über einige schon bekannte. Wien. ent. Ztg 36: 229–262.Google Scholar
Haupt, H. 1935. Unterordnung: Gleichflügler, Homoptera. Die Tierwelt Mitteleuropas … 4(3): 115–221.Google Scholar
Herrich-Schäffer, G.A.W. 1830. Aphrophora dimidiata … In Panzer's Fauna Insectorum Germaniae 112: 17–23.Google Scholar
Horváth, G. 1911. Hemiptera nova vel minus cognita e regione palaearctica. II. Annls hist.-nat. Mus. natn. hung. 9: 573–610.Google Scholar
International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. 1961. Opinion 590 — Aphrophora Germar, 1821 (Insecta, Hemiptera): designation under the plenary powers of a type-species in harmony with accustomed usage. Bull. Zool. Nomen. 18: 109–111.Google Scholar
Lallemand, V. 1912. Homoptera, Fam. Cercopidae. Genera Insect. 143. 167 pp.Google Scholar
Lethierry, L.F. 1869. Deuxième division — Homoptères. In Catalogue des Hémiptères du Départment du Nord. Mém. Soc. Sci. Agric. Lille 1868: 305–374.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema Naturae … 10th ed., 1. 824 pp.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1767. Hemiptera. Systema Naturae … 12th ed., 1 (2): 533–1327.Google Scholar
Melichar, L. 1896. Cicadinen (Hemiptera-Homoptera) von Mittel-Europa, 1896. 364 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melichar, L. 1899. Beitrag zur Kenntniss der Homopteren-Fauna von Tunis. Wien. ent. Ztg 18: 175–190.Google Scholar
Metcalf, Z.P. 1955. New names in the Homoptera. J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 45: 262–267.Google Scholar
Ossiannilsson, F. 1957. The lectotype of Cicada spumaria L., 1758. Opusc. ent. 22: 66.Google Scholar
Provancher, L. 1890. Petite faune entomologique du Canada … 3. 355 pp.Google Scholar
Rey, C. 1894. Remarques en passant. Echange 10(111): 29–30.Google Scholar
Sahlberg, J.R. 1871. Ofversigt af Finlands och den Skandinaviska hälfons Cicadariae. I. Notis. Sällsk. Fauna Flora Förh. 9(12). 506 pp.Google Scholar
Say, T. 1831. Descriptions of new North American Hemipterous insects … J. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad. 6: 299–314.Google Scholar
Schrank, F.P. 1776. Beiträge zur Naturgeschichte. 137 pp.Google Scholar
Schrank, F.P. 1781. Enumeratio Insectorum Austriae Indigenorum. 549 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrank, F.P. 1801. Homoptera. Fauna Boica. Durchgedachte Geschichte der in Baiern einheimischen und zahmen Thiere 2(1). 374 pp.Google Scholar
Scopoli, J.A. 1763. Entomologie Carniolica … 421 pp.Google Scholar
Stål, C. 1864. Hemiptera mexicana enumeravit speciesque novas descripsit. Stettin. ent. Ztg 25: 49–86.Google Scholar
Stearns, L.A. 1918. Description of a new species of the family Cercopidae from Wisconsin (Hem., Hom.). Ent. News 29: 3–4.Google Scholar
Stearns, L.A. 1923. Family Cercopidae. In Britton's Guide to the Insects of Connecticut, 4, Hemiptera … Bull. Conn. St. geol. nat. Hist. Surv. 34: 206–238.Google Scholar
Stoll, C. 1788. Cigales. Représentation exactement colorée … 124 pp.Google Scholar
Strickland, E.H. 1953. An annotated list of the Hemiptera (s.l.) of Alberta. Can. Ent. 85(6): 193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thunberg, C.P. 1784. Novae insectorum species descriptae. Nova Acta R. Soc. Scient. upsal. 4. 28 pp.Google Scholar
Turton, W. 1802. A General System of Nature … 2. 719 pp.Google Scholar
Uhler, P.R. 1872. A list of Hemiptera collected in eastern Colorado and northeastern New Mexico, by C. Thomas, during the expedition of 1869. Prelim. Rep. U.S. geol. Surv. 1872: 471–472.Google Scholar
Uhler, P.R. 1876. List of Hemiptera of the region west of the Mississippi River … Bull. U.S. geol. geogr. Surv. Terr. 1(5). 103 pp.Google Scholar
Van Duzee, E.P. 1914. Nomenclatural and critical notes on Hemiptera. Can. Ent. 46: 377–389.Google Scholar
Vilbaste, J. 1962. Über die Zikadenfauna des östlichen Teiles des kaspischen Tieflandes (in Russian). Eesti Tead. Akad. Loodusuur. Seltsi Aastar 55: 129–151.Google Scholar
Wagner, W. 1935. Beitrag zur Homopteren-Fauna Dänemarks und Beschreibung von drei neuen Varietäten aus der Gattung Philaenus Stal. Ent. Meddr 19: 162–171.Google Scholar
Wagner, W. 1955. Die Bewertung morphologischer Merkmale in den unteren taxonomischen Kategorien, aufgezeigt und Beispielen aud der Taxonomie der Zikaden. Mitt. hamb. zool. Mus. Inst. 53: 75–108.Google Scholar
Wagner, W. 1959. IX. Teil Homoptera. In Beier, M., Zoologische Studien in Westgriechenland. Sber. öst. Akad. Wiss., Math.-naturw. Kl. (1) 168: 583–605.Google Scholar
Wagner, W. 1968. Die Grundlagen der dynamischen Taxonomie, zugleich ein Beitrag zur Struktur der Phylogenese. Abh. Verhandl. naturwiss. Vereins Hamb. (N.F.) 12: 27–66.Google Scholar
Walker, F. 1851. List of the specimens of homopterous insects in the collection of the British Museum 3: 637–907.Google Scholar
Walley, G.S. 1929. Notes on the genus Philaenus in America north of Mexico (Homop., Cercopidae). Can. Ent. 61(7): 155–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, C.R. and King, D.R.. 1954. Meadow Spittlebug. Ohio agric. Exp. Stn res. Bull. 741. 99 pp.Google Scholar
Zetterstedt, J.W. 1828. Fauna Insectorum Lapponica, 1, 563 pp.Google Scholar