Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T06:54:31.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SUSCEPTIBILITY OF LOW- AND HIGH-GLUCOSINOLATE OILSEED RAPES TO DAMAGE BY FLEA BEETLES, PHYLLOTRETA SPP. (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

R. J. Lamb
R. J. Lamb
Affiliation:
Agriculture Canada Research Station, 195 Dafoe Road, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2M9
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The oilseed rape crop, Brassica napus L. and B. campestris L., has undergone a significant chemical transformation during the last 15 years. Plant breeders produced cultivars with only trace levels of erucic acid in the oil compared with 40-50% in early cultivars, and with 18 μmol/g of glucosinolates or less in the oil-free meal compared with 62-1 15 μmol/g (Daun 1983). The new “Canola” cultivars were developed because erucic acid was a suspected health hazard for humans and glucosinolates caused the meal to be unpalatable or toxic to farm animals.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 120 , Issue 2 , February 1988 , pp. 195 - 196
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blau, P.A., Feeny, P., Contardo, L., and Robson, D.S.. 1978. Allylglucosinolate and herbivorous caterpillars: a contrast in toxicity and tolerance. Science 200: 1296–1298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daun, J.K. 1983. The introduction of low erucic acid rapeseed varieties into Canadian production. In Kramer, J.K.G., and Sauer, F.D. (Eds.), High and Low Erucic Acid Rapeseed Oils. Academic Press, Toronto.Google Scholar
Lamb, R.J. 1984. Effects of flea beetles, Phyllotreta spp. (Chrysomelidae: Coleoptera), on the survival, growth, seed yield and quality of canola, rape and yellow mustard. Can. Ent. 116: 269–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, R.J. 1988. Assessing the susceptibility of crucifer seedlings to flea beetle (Phyllotreta spp.) damage. Can. J. Plant Sci. 68: In press.Google Scholar
Nielsen, J.K. 1978. Host plant discrimination within Cruciferae: feeding responses of four leaf beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) to glucosinolates, cucurbitacins and cardenolides. Ent. exp. appl. 24: 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, L.G. 1977. Response of four Brassica seed crop species to attack by the crucifer flea beetle, Phyllotreta cruciferae. Can. J. Plant Sci. 57: 987–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sang, J.P., Minchinton, I.R., Johnstone, P.K., and Truscott, R.J.W.. 1984. Glucosinolate profiles in the seed, root and leaf tissue of cabbage, mustard, rapeseed, radish and swede. Can. J. Plant. Sci. 64: 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, P. 1984. Canola Growers Manual. Canola Council of Canada, Winnipeg.Google Scholar