Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:53:16.865Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SUSCEPTIBILITY OF 31 SPECIES OF AGRICULTURAL INSECT PESTS TO THE ENTOMOGENOUS NEMATODES STEINERNEMA FELTIAE AND HETERORHABDITIS BACTERIOPHORA1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

O. N. Morris
Affiliation:
Agriculture Canada, Research Station, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2M9

Abstract

The susceptibility of 31 species of agricultural insect pests representing 7 families of Lepidoptera, 3 of Diptera, and 3 of Coleoptera to the entomogenous nematodes Steinernema feltiae Filipjev and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora Poinar, were investigated in the laboratory. Of the 27 species found susceptible to S. feltiae, 19 are reported for the first time. Of the 21 species killed by H. bacteriophora, 15 are reported for the first time. The Lepidoptera as a group were highly susceptible to the nematodes. On the basis of larval mortality caused by the nematodes, of nematode reproduction in insect cadavers, and of the known economic importance and life histories of the test insects, S. feltiae was judged to warrant further research as a possible biological-control agent against Euxoa ochrogaster (Guenée), E. auxiliaris (Grote), Agrotis orthogonia (Morr.), Actebia fennica (Tauscher), Mamestra configurata Walker, Delia radicum (L.), D. antiqua (Meig.), and Zygogramma exclamationis (F.).

Résumé

On a étudié en laboratoire la susceptibilité de 31 espèces d'insectes nuisibles en agriculture, représentant 7 familles de Lépidoptères, 3 de Diptères, et 3 de Coléoptères, à l'infection par les nematodes entomogènes Steinernema feltiae Filipjev et Heterorhabditis bacteriophora Poinar. Parmi les 27 espèces trouvées susceptibles à S. feltiae, 19 l'étaient pour la première fois. Des 21 espèces susceptibles à H. bacteriophora, 15 sont mentionnées pour la première fois. Dans l'ensemble, les Lépidoptères se sont avérés très susceptibles. D'après la mortalité larvaire causée par les nematodes, leur reproduction dans les cadavres d'insectes, et l'importance économique des insectes testés, on juge que S. feltiae devrait être étudié davantage en tant qu'auxiliaire possible de lutte contre Euxoa ochrogaster (Guenée), E. auxiliaris (Grote), Agrotis orthogonia (Morr.), Actebia fennica (Tauscher), Mamestra configurata Walker, Delia radicum (L.), D. antiqua (Meig.), et Zygogramma exclamationis (F.).

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arthur, A. P. 1978. The occurrence, life history, courtship, and mating behaviour of the sunflower moth, Homoeosoma electellum (Lepidoptera: Phycitidae) in the Canadian prairie provinces. Can. Ent. 110: 913916.Google Scholar
Bedding, R. A. 1984. Large scale production, storage and transport of the insect parasitic nematodes Neoplectana spp. and Heterorhabditis spp. Ann. appl. Biol. 104: 117120.Google Scholar
Finney, J. R. and Walker, C.. 1977. The DD-136 strain of Neoplectana sp. as a potential biological control agent for the European elm bark beetle, Scolytus scolytus. J. invert. Path. 29: 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaugler, R. and Boush, M.. 1978. Effects of ultraviolet radiation and sunlight on the entomogenous nematode, Neoplectana carpocapsae. J. invert. Path. 32: 291296.Google Scholar
Gerber, G. H., Neill, G. B., and Westdal, P. H.. 1979. The reproductive cycles of the sunflower beetle, Zygogramma exclamationis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), in Manitoba. Can. J. Zool. 57: 19341943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harlan, D. P., Dutky, S. R., Padgett, G. R., Mitchell, J. A., Shaw, A. Z., and Bartlett, F. J.. 1971. Parasitism of Neoplectana dutkyii in white-fringed beetle larvae. J. Nematol. 3: 280283.Google Scholar
Kaya, H. K. and Grieve, B. J.. 1982. The nematode Neoplectana carpocapsae and the beet armyworm Spodoptera exigua: infectivity of prepupae and pupae in soil and adults during emergence from soil. J. invert. Path. 39: 192197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaya, H. K. and Hara, A. H.. 1980. Susceptibility of various species of lepidopterous pupae to entomogenous nematode Neoplectana carpocapsae. J. Nematol. 13: 291294.Google Scholar
Kaya, H. K. and Hara, A. H.. 1981. Differential susceptibility of lepidopterous pupae to infection by the nematode Neoplectana carpocapsae. J. invert. Path. 36: 389393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinoshita, G. B., Svec, H. J., Harris, C. R., and McEwen, F. L.. 1979. Biology of the crucifer flea beetle, Phyllotreta cruciferae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), in southwestern Ontario. Can. Ent. 111: 13951407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laumond, C., Mauleon, H., and Kermarrec, A.. 1979. Donnees nouvelles sur le spectre d'Hotes et le parasitisme du nematode entomophage Neoplectana carpocapsae. Entomophaga 24: 1327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, L. C. and Raun, E. S.. 1978. Laboratory and field evaluation of the DD-136 strain of Neoplectana carpocapsae for the control of the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis. Iowa St. J. Res. 52: 391392.Google Scholar
Molloy, D., Gaugler, R., and Jamnback, H.. 1980. The pathogenicity of Neoplectana carpocapsae to blackfly larvae. J. invert. Path. 36: 302306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poinar, G. O. (Jr.). 1975. Entomogenous nematodes. E. J. Brill, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poinar, G. O. (Jr.). 1979. Nematodes for biological control of insects. CRC Press. 317 pp.Google Scholar
Samsook, V. and Sikora, R. A.. 1981. Influence of parasite density, host developmental stage and leaf wetness duration on Neoplectana carpocapsae parasitism of Heliothis virescens. Meded. van de Faculteit Landbounio, Rijksuniversiteit Genit. 46: 685693.Google Scholar
Simons, W. R. and Poinar, G. O. Jr., 1973. The ability of Neoplectana carpocapsae (Steinernematidae: Nematodea) to survive extended periods of desiccation. J. invert. Path. 22: 228230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, G. M. and Poinar, G. O. Jr. 1979. Xenorhabdus gen. nov., a genus of entomopathogenic, nematophilic bacteria of the family Enterobacteriaceae. Int. J. system. Bacteriol. 29: 352360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, H. E. and Briand, L. J.. 1961. Tests of the nematode DD 136 and an associated bacterium for control of the colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say). Can. Ent. 93: 759763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar