Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T10:34:39.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A SUCCESSFUL METHOD FOR ARTIFICIALLY HIBERNATING MEGABOMBUS F. FERVIDUS, AND NOTES ON A RELATED SPECIES (HYMENOPTERA: APIDAE; BOMBINAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

H. E. Milliron
H. E. Milliron
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Institute, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Megabombus f. fervidus (F.) queens were successfully hibernated in 1961–62 under artificial conditions that are described in detail. One-half succumbed within 3 days after being removed to conditions allowing resumption of active behavior, and 68.7% perished by the end of 3 weeks. Hibernation and (or) post-hibernation survival are believed to be dependent on the amount of fat bodies metabolized prior to this dispause period. Infertile queens (and possibly large workers) are capable of hibernating. It has been discovered that during hibernation the spermatozoa encyst in the spermatheea of fervidus, and it is probable that this phenomenon is not unusual to most species hibernating under cold conditions.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 99 , Issue 12 , December 1967 , pp. 1321 - 1332
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Frison, T. H. 1927. The fertilization and hibernation of queen bumblebees under controlled conditions. J. econ. Ent. 20: 522–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasselrot, T. B. 1960. Studies on Swedish bumblebees (Genus Bombus Latr.). Their domestication and biology. Opusc. ent. Suppl. XVII.Google Scholar
Holm, Sv. N. 1960. Experiments on the domestication of bumblebees (Bombus Latr.) in particular B. lapidarius L. and B. terrestris L. K. Vet.- og Landbohisk. Aarsskr. 1–19.Google Scholar
Holm, Sv. N., and Haas, H.. 1961. Erfahrungen und Resultate dreijähriger Domestikationsversuche mit Hummeln. Albrecht-Thaer-Arch. 5(4): 282–304.Google Scholar
Horber, E. 1961. Beitrag zur Domestikation der Hummeln. Untersuchungen über die natürliche Überwinterung, etc. Vjschr. naturf. Ges. Zurich. 106: 424–447.Google Scholar
Lindhard, E. 1912. Humlebien som Husdyr. Spredte Traek af nogle danske Humlebiarters Biologi. Tidsskr. PlAvl 19: 335–352.Google Scholar
Medler, J. T. 1958. Principles and methods for the utilization of bumblebees in cross-pollination of crops. Proc. 10th int. Congr. Ent. (1956). Vol. 4. pp. 973–981.Google Scholar
Plath, O. E. 1927. Notes on the hibernation of several North American bumblebees. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 20: 181–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sladen, F. W. L. 1912. The bumble-bee, its life history and how to domesticate it. Macmillan & Co., Ltd., London.Google Scholar