Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:11:52.672Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the Cuticle of the Grasshopper Melanoplus bivittatus (Say) (Orthoptera: Acrididae): I. General Properties of the Cuticle1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

W. Chefurka  and
J. H. Pepper
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Numerous studies have shown that the cuticle of insects is complex and highly-differentiated and that the complexity varies from species to species (2, 8, 11, 13, 14, 17, 18).

The object of this study is to determine cuticular relationships between the grasshopper, Melanoplus bivittatus, and other insects already studied. This work was carried out by means of chemical tests and permeability measurements on fresh material rather than by methods of fixing and sectioning.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 87 , Issue 4 , April 1955 , pp. 145 - 151
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Blower, G. 1951. A comparative study of the chilopod and diplopod cuticle. Quart. Jour. Micros. Science, 92, 141–161.Google Scholar
2.Dennell, R. 1946. A study of an insect cuticle: the larval cuticle of Sarcophaga falculata Pand. (Diprera), Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. B. 133, 348–373.Google Scholar
3.Glick, D. 1949. Techniques of Histo-and Cytochemistry, Interscience Publishers Inc., N.Y.Google Scholar
4.Gunn, D. L. 1933. The temperature and humidity relations of the cockroach (Blatta orientalis) I. Desiccation. J. Exp. Biol. 10, 274–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Hurst, H. 1950. An electron diffraction study of the crystalline structure of the lipids in the pupal exuviae of Calliphora erythrocephala. J. Exp. Biol. 27, 238–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Jacobson, W. 1939. The argentaffine cells and pernicious anaemia. Jour. Path. Bact. 49, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Lafon, M. 1943. Recherches biochemiques et physiologiques sur le squelette tegumentaire des arthropods. Ann. Sci. Nat. ser. Bot. Zool. 11, 113–146.Google Scholar
8.Lees, A. D. 1947. Transpiration and the structure of the epicuticle in ticks. J. Exp. Biol. 23, 379–410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Lison, L. 1936. Histochémie Animale. Méthodes et Problèmes. Gauthier-Villars Paris.Google Scholar
10.Ramsay, J. A. 1935. The evaporation of water from the cockroach. J. Exp. Biol. 12, 373–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Richards, A. G. and Anderson, T. F.. 1942. Electron microscope studies of insects cuticle with a discussion of the application of electron optics to this problem. Jour. Morph., 71, 135–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Vishwa, N. 1933. Microchemical tests for fats, lipoids and vacuoles with special reference to oogenesis. Quart. J. Micros. Science, 76, 129–143.Google Scholar
13.Way, M. J. 1950. The structure and development of the larval cuticle of Diataraxia oleracea (Lepidoptera). Quart. J. Micros. Science, 91, 145–182.Google ScholarPubMed
14.Webb, J. E. 1947. The structure of the cuticle in Eomenacanthus stramineus (Nitzsch.) (Mallophaga). Parasitology, 38, 70–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Wigglesworth, V. B. 1933. The physiology of the epicuticle and of ecdysis in Rhodnius prolixus (Triatomidae, Hemiptera); with special reference to the function of the oenocytes and of the dermal glands. Quart. Jour. Micros. Sci., 76, 269–318.Google Scholar
16.Wigglesworth, V. B. 1945. Transpiration through the cuticle of insects. J. Exp. Biol. 21, 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Wigglesworth, V. B. 1947. The epicuticle in the insect Rhodnius prolixus. Proc. Roy. Soc. Ser. B. 134, 163–181.Google ScholarPubMed
18.Wigglesworth, V. B. 1948. The structure and deposition of the cuticle in the adult mealworm, Tenebrio molitor. Quart. J. Micros. Sci. 89, 197–217.Google ScholarPubMed