Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:49:18.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Mites of the Subfamily Phytoseiinae (Acarina: Laelaptidae) from Southeastern England, with Descriptions of New Species1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

D. A. Chant
D. A. Chant
Affiliation:
Biological Control Section, Entomology Laboratory Vancouver, B.C.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

For several years the author has been engaged in a study of the predacious mites of value in controlling the European red mite, Metatetranychus ulmi (Koch), in southeastern England. During this time, extensive collections of mites of the subfamily Phytoseiinae were made and several new species found. These are described here.

New species of Phytoseiinae have usually been described from female specimens only; the males have been frequently unknown. It is essential in ecological investigations to be familiar with both mature forms. During this study the males of some species of which the females had been described were collected and reared. Some of these have been described elsewhere (Chant, in preparation) and in this paper the male of Typhlodromus bakeri (Garman), 1948, is dealt with.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 88 , Issue 1 , January 1956 , pp. 26 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berlese, A. 1915. Acari nuovi. Redia 10: 113–150.Google Scholar
Chant, D. A.Notes on mites of the genus Typhlodromus Scheuten, 1857 (Acarina: Laelaptidae), with descriptions of the males of some species and the female of a new species. Canadian Ent. In press.Google Scholar
Evans, G. O. 1952. A new typhlodromid mite predaceous on Tetranychus bimaculatus Harvey in Indonesia. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (12) 5: 413–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G. O. 1953. On some mites of the genus Typhlodromus Scheuten 1857, from S. E. Asia. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (Ser. 12) 6: 449–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G. O. 1954. The genus Iphiseius Berl., (Acarina: Laelaptidae). Proc. Zool. Soc. London 124: 517–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garman, P. 1948. Mite species from apple trees in Connecticut. Connecticut Agr. Expt. Sta. Bull. No. 520; 27 pp.Google Scholar
Nesbitt, H. H. J. 1951. A taxonomie study of the Phytoseiinae (family Laelaptidae) predaceous upon Tetranychidae of economic importance. Zool. Verb. No. 12: 64 pp. + 32 pls.Google Scholar
Nesbitt, H. H. J. 1954. Some random notes on the mite fauna of Limburg with the description of two new species. Natuurhistorisch Maandblad. 43(3): 19–24.Google Scholar
Willmann, C. 1949. Beiträge sur Kenntnis der Salzgebietes von Ciechocinek. Verhöff. Mus. Nat. Bremen. 1A: 106–135.Google Scholar
Willmann, C. 1952. Die Milbenfauna der Noorseeinel Wangerooge. Verhöff. Inst. Meeresforsch. Bremerhaven 1: 139–186.Google Scholar
Womersley, H. 1954. Species of the subfamily Phytoseiinae (Acarina: Laelaptidae) from Australia. Australian J. Zool. 2: 169–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar