Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:05:08.202Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SHIPPING HONEY BEE QUEENS IN PACKAGE BEES WITH AND WITHOUT ATTENDANTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

S. C. Jay
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg

Abstract

Queen losses were compared when caged queens with attendant worker bees and caged queens without attendants were used in packages of honey bees being shipped from the southern United States to Canada. When the colonies were hived there was no difference in queen losses in the two treatments.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Butler, C. G., and Simpson, J.. 1956. The introduction of virgin and mated queens directly and in a simple cage. Bee World 37(6): 106–114, 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Free, J. B., and Butler, C. G.. 1958. The size of apertures through which worker honeybees will feed one another. Bee World 39(2): 4042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jay, S. C. 1965. Reducing queen losses in package bees by using queen cages of large-mesh wire gauze. J. apic. Res. 4(1): 3538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laidlaw, H. H., and Eckert, J. E.. 1950. Queen rearing. Dadant, Hamilton, Ill.Google Scholar
Morse, R. A., and Gary, N. E.. 1961. Colony response to worker bees confined with queens (Apis mellifera L.). Bee World 42(8): 197199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribbands, C. R. 1953. The behaviour and social life of honeybees. Bee Research Association, London.Google Scholar
Sladen, F. W. L. 1913. Queen-rearing in England. Madgwick, Houlston, London.Google Scholar
Wankler, W. 1924. Die Königin. Theodor Fisher, Freiburg.Google Scholar