Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T08:47:18.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Semiochemistry and chemical ecology of the emerald ash borer Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2014

Peter Silk  and
Krista Ryall
Peter Silk*
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service-Atlantic Forestry Centre, PO Box 4000, Fredericton, New Brunswick, E3B 5P7Canada
Krista Ryall
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service - Great Lakes Forestry Centre, 1219 Queen Street East, Sault Ste Marie, Ontario, P6A 2E5Canada
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The emerald ash borer (EAB), Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) is a very serious invasive pest in North America, causing extremely high levels of mortality to ash trees (Fraxinus Linnaeus, Oleaceae) in the United States of America and Canada. Knowledge of buprestid chemical ecology is sparse, but the appearance of EAB in North America and its devastating ecological and economic impacts, particularly in the urban environment, have provided an opportunity to study the semiochemistry, natural history, and ecology of this buprestid in detail. This review will summarise the chemical ecology of EAB to date, discussing studies on semiochemistry, natural history, and behaviour with respect to host and mate finding that have identified several female-produced pheromone components (contact and sex pheromones), and attractive host kairomones. Earlier reviews focused on studies of attractive host volatiles with respect to development of a trapping system and visual and contact phenomena in EAB mate finding. This has led to the development of an efficient trapping system for EAB, with attempts to optimise the range of variables in trap protocols, combining pheromone components, release rates, and combinations with host kairomones, as well as trap type, placement, height, and colour being taken into account.

Type
Original Article
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 147 , Special Issue 3: Emerald Ash Borer , June 2015 , pp. 277 - 289
Copyright
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Subject editor: Chris MacQuarrie

References

Bartelt, R., Cossé, A.A., Zilkowski, B.W., and Fraser, I. 2007. Antennally active macrolide from the emerald ash borer Agrilus planipennis emitted predominantly by females. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 33: 1299–1302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coleman, T.W. and Seybold, S.J. 2008. Previously unrecorded damage to oak, Quercus spp., in southern California by the goldspotted oak borer, Agrilus coxalis Waterhouse (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Pan-Pacific Entomologist, 84: 288–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, S.M., Khan, Z.R., and Pickett, J.A. 2007. The use of push–pull strategies in integrated pest management. Annual Reviews of Entomology, 52: 375–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cossé, A.A., Bartelt, R.J., Zikowski, B.W., and Fraser, I. 2008. Identification and antennal electrophysiology of ash bark volatiles for emerald ash borer. In Proceedings of the emerald ash borer and Asian longhorned beetle research and technology development meeting, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 23–24 October, 2007. Edited by V. Mastro, D. Lance, R. Reardon, and G. Parra. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States of America. Pp. 81–82.Google Scholar
Cossé, A.A., Petroski, R.J., Zilkowski, B.W., Vermillion, K., Lelito, J.P., Cooperband, M.F., et al. 2012. Male- produced pheromone of Spathius agrili, a parasitoid introduced for the biological control of the invasive emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 38: 389–399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crook, D.J., Francese, J.A., Zylstra, K.E., Fraser, I., Sawyer, A.J., Bartells, D.W., et al. 2009. Laboratory and field response of emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), to selected regions of the electromagnetic spectrum. Journal of Economic Entomology, 102: 2160–2169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crook, D.J., Kerr, L.M., and Mastro, V.C. 2008a. Distribution and fine structure of antennal sensilla in emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 101: 1103–1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crook, D.J., Khrimian, A., Cossé, A., Fraser, I., and Mastro, V.C. 2012. Influence of trap color and host volatiles on capture of the emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 105: 429–437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crook, D.J., Khrimian, A., Francese, J.A., Fraser, I., Poland, T.M., Sawyer, A.J., et al. 2008b. Development of a host-based semiochemical lure for trapping emerald ash borer Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Environmental Entomology, 37: 356–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crook, D.J. and Mastro, V.C. 2010. Chemical ecology of the emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 36: 101–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Groot, P., Grant, G.G., Poland, T.M., Scharbach, R., Buchan, L., Nott, R.W., et al. 2008. Electrophysiological response and attraction of emerald ash borer to green leaf volatiles (GLVs) emitted by host foliage. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 34: 1170–1179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Domingue, M.J. and Baker, T.C. 2012. A multi-disciplinary approach for developing tools to monitor invasive buprestid beetle species. In Invasive species: threats, ecological impact and control methods. Edited by J.J. Blanco and A.T. Fernandes. Nova, Hauppauge, New York, United States of America. Pp. 77–100.Google Scholar
Domingue, M.J., Csóka, G., Tóth, M., Vétek, G., Pénzes, B., Mastro, V.C., et al. 2011a. Field observations of visual attraction of three European oak buprestid beetles towards conspecific and heterospecific models. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 140: 112–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domingue, M.J., Imrei, Z., Lelito, J.P., Muskovits, J., Janik, G., Mastro, V.C., et al. 2013. Trapping of European buprestid beetles in oak forests using visual and olfactory cues. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 148: 116–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domingue, M.J., Lelito, J.P., Fraser, I., Mastro, V.C., Tumlinson, J.H., and Baker, T.C. 2011b. Visual and chemical cues affecting the detection rate of the emerald ash borer in sticky traps. Journal of Applied Entomology, 137: 77–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duan, J.J., Taylor, P.B., Fuester, R.W., Kula, R.R., and Marsh, P.M. 2013. Hymenopteran parasitoids attacking the invasive emerald ash borer (Coleoptera:Buprestidae) in western and central Pennsylvania. Florida Entomologist, 96: 166–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, J.P., Kimmerer, T.W., and Nordin, G.L. 1986. The role of host tree condition in attack of white oaks by the twolined chestnut borer, Agrilus bilineatus (Weber) (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Oecologia, 70: 596–600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, J.P. and Potter, D.A. 1988. Evidence for sexual attraction by the twolined chestnut borer, Agrilus bilineatus (Weber) (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). The Canadian Entomologist, 120: 1037–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EAB 2014. Emerald ash borer information website [online]. Available from http://www.emeraldashborer.info/faq.cfm#sthash.AxgCzEgN.dpbs [accessed 12 August 2014].Google Scholar
Francese, J.A., Crook, D.J., Fraser, I., Lance, D.R., Sawyer, A.J., and Mastro, V.C. 2008. Further investigations in developing a trap for emerald ash borer: how trap height affects capture rates. In Emerald ash borer research and development meeting. Edited by V. Mastro, D. Lance, R. Reardon, and G. Parra. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States of America. Pp. 79–80.Google Scholar
Francese, J.A., Fraser, I., Lance, D.R., and Mastro, V.C. 2007. Developing survey techniques for emerald ash borer: the role of trap height and design. In Proceedings: emerald ash borer research and technology development meeting, 29 October–2 November 2006. Edited by V. Mastro, D. Lance, R. Reardon, and G. Parra. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America. Pp. 72–73.Google Scholar
Gibbs, A.G. 1998. Water-proofing properties of cuticular lipids. American Zoologist, 38: 471–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, G.G., Poland, T.M., Ciaramitaro, T., Lyons, D.B., and Jones, G.C. 2011. Comparison of male and female emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) responses to Phoebe oil and (Z)-3-hexenol lures in light green prism traps. Journal of Economic Entomology, 104: 173–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, G.G., Ryall, K.L., Lyons, D.B., and Abou-Zaid, M.M. 2010. Differential response of male and female emerald ash borers (Col., Buprestidae) to (Z)-3-hexenol and Manuka oil. Journal of Applied Entomology, 134: 26–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gwynne, D.T. and Rentz, D.C.F. 1983. Beetles on the bottle: male buprestids mistake stubbies for females (Coleoptera). Journal of the Australian Entomological Society, 22: 79–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haack, R.A., Jendek, E., Lui, H., Marchant, K.R., Petrice, T., Poland, T.M., et al. 2002. The emerald ash borer: a new exotic pest in North America. Newsletter of the Michigan Entomological Society, 47: 1–5.Google Scholar
Haack, R.A., Petrice, T.R., and Zablotny, J.E. 2009. The first report of the European oak borer, Agrilus sulcicollis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), in the United States. Great Lakes Entomologist, 42: 1–7.Google Scholar
Hanks, L.M. and Millar, J.G. 2013. Field bioassays of cerambycid pheromones reveal widespread parsimony of pheromone structures, enhancement by host plant volatiles, and antagonism by components from heterospecifics. Chemoecology, 23: 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanks, L.M., Millar, J.G., Moreira, J.A., Barbour, J.D., Lacey, E.S., McElfresh, J.S., et al. 2007. Using generic pheromone lures to expedite identification of aggregation pheromones for the cerambycid beetles Xylotrechus nauticus, Phymatodes lecontei, and Neoclytus modestus modestus. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 33: 889–907.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herms, D.A. and McCullough, D.G. 2014. Emerald ash borer invasion of North America: history, biology, ecology, impacts and management. Annual Review of Entomology, 59: 13–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howard, R.W. and Blomquist, G.J. 2005. Ecological, behavioral and biochemical aspects of insect hydrocarbons. Annual Review of Entomology, 50: 371–393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jendek, E. and Grebennikov, V.V. 2009. Agrilus sulcicollis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), a new alien species in North America. The Canadian Entomologist, 141: 236–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khrimian, A., Cossé, A.A., and Crook, D.J. 2011. Absolute configuration of 7-epi-sesquithujene. Journal of Natural Products, 74: 1414–1420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lance, D.R., Fraser, I., and Mastro, V.C. 2007. Activity and microhabitat-selection patterns for emerald ash borer and their implications for the development of trapping systems. In Emerald ash borer research and asian longhorned beetle research and technology development meeting. Edited by V. Mastro, D. Lance, R. Reardon, and G. Parra. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States of America. Pp. 77–78.Google Scholar
Lassance, J.-M. and Löfstedt, C. 2009. Concerted evolution of male and female display traits in the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis. BMC Biology, 7: 10. Available from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7007/7/10 [accessed 29 July 2014].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lelito, J.P., Böröczky, K., Jones, T.H., Frazer, I., Mastro, V.C., Tumlinson, J.H., et al. 2009. Behavioral evidence for a contact pheromone component of the emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 35: 104–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lelito, J.P., Domingue, M.J., Fraser, I., Mastro, V.C., Tumlinson, J.H., and Baker, T.C. 2011. Field investigation of mating behaviour of Agrilus cyanescens and Agrilus subcinctus. The Canadian Entomologist, 143: 370–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lelito, J.P., Fraser, I., Mastro, V.C., Tumlinson, J.H., and Baker, T.C. 2008. Novel visual-cue-based sticky traps for monitoring of emerald ash borers, Agrilus planipennis (Col., Buprestidae). Journal of Applied Entomology, 132: 668–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lelito, J.P., Fraser, I., Mastro, V.C., Tumlinson, J.H., Böröczky, K., and Baker, T.C. 2007. Visually mediated ‘paratrooper copulations’ in the mating behavior of Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), a highly destructive invasive pest of North American ash trees. Journal of Insect Behavior, 20: 537–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, D.B. 2015. What’s killing the green menace: mortality factors affecting the emerald ash borer in North America? The Canadian Entomologist, this issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, D.B., de Groot, P., Jones, G.C., and Scharbach, R. 2009. Host selection by Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae): inferences from sticky-band trapping. The Canadian Entomologist, 141: 40–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MaGee, D.I., Mayo, P.D., Silk, P.J., and Beattie, B. 2013. Synthesis of (3E)-dodecen-12-olide, a potential pheromone component of the emerald ash borer. Synthetic Communications, 43: 1368–1377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mamidala, P., Wijeratne, A.J., Wijeratne, S., Poland, T., Qazi, S.S., Doucet, D., et al. 2013. Identification of odor-processing genes in the emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis Public Library of Science One, 8: 1–15.Google ScholarPubMed
Marshall, J.M., Storer, A.J., Fraser, I., and Mastro, V.C. 2010. Efficacy of trap and lure types for detection of Agrilus planipennis (Col, Buprestidae) at low density. Journal of Applied Entomology, 134: 296–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayo, P.D., Silk, P.J., MaGee, D.I., and McConaghy, J. 2014. Concise synthesis of (3Z)-dodecen-12-olide, pheromone component of the emerald ash borer. Synthetic Communications, 44: 1957–1969. doi: 10.1080/00397911.2014.881497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCullough, D.G. and Mercader, R.J. 2012. Evaluation of potential strategies to Slow Ash Mortality (SLAM) caused by emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis): SLAM in an urban forest. International Journal of Pest Management, 58: 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCullough, D.G., Poland, T.M., Anulewicz, A.C., and Cappaert, D. 2009a. Emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) attraction to stressed or baited ash trees. Environmental Entomology, 38: 1668–1679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCullough, D.G., Poland, T.M., and Cappaert, D.L. 2006. Attraction of emerald ash borer to trap trees: effects of stress agents and trap height. In Proceedings: emerald ash borer research and technology development meeting, 26–27 September 2005. Edited by V. Mastro, R. Reardon, and G. Parra. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America. Pp. 61–62.Google Scholar
McCullough, D.G., Poland, T.M., and Cappaert, D. 2009b. Attraction of the emerald ash borer to ash trees stressed by girdling, herbicide treatment or wounding. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 38: 1331–1345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, N., Helson, B., Thompson, D., Otis, G., McFarlane, J., Buscarini, T., et al. 2010. Azadirachtin: an effective systemic insecticide for control of Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 103: 708–717.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, R.F., Graham, E.E., Wong, J.C.H., Reagel, P.F., Striman, B.L., Hughes, G.P., et al. 2011. Fuscumol and fuscumol acetate are general attractants for many species of cerambycid beetles in the subfamily Lamiinae. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 141: 71–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nehme, M.E., Keena, M.A., Zhang, A., Baker, T.C., Xu, Z., and Hoover, K. 2010. Evaluating the use of male-produced pheromone components and host volatiles in two trap designs to monitor Anoplophora glabripennis. Environmental Entomology, 39: 169–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, D.R. and Blomquist, G.J. 1995. Insect waxes. In Waxes: chemistry, molecular biology and functions. Edited by R.J. Hamilton. Oily Press, Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom. Pp. 1–90.Google Scholar
Poland, T.M., McCullough, D.G., de Groot, P., Grant, G.G., MacDonald, L., and Cappaert, D.L. 2005. Progress toward developing trapping techniques for the emerald ash borer. In Proceedings: emerald ash borer research and technology development meeting, 5–6 October 2004. Edited by V. Mastro and R. Reardon. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, Romulus, Michigan, United States of America. Pp. 53–54.Google Scholar
Pureswaran, D.S. and Poland, T.M. 2009a. Effects of visual silhouette, leaf size and host species on feeding preference by adult emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Great Lakes Entomologist, 42: 62–71.Google Scholar
Pureswaran, D.S. and Poland, T.M. 2009b. Host selection and feeding preference of Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) on ash (Fraxinus spp.). Environmental Entomology, 38: 757–765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pureswaran, D.S. and Poland, T.M. 2009c. The role of olfactory cues in short-range mate finding by the emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis, Fairmaire (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Journal of Insect Behavior, 22: 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez-Saona, C.R., Miller, J.R., Poland, T.M., Kuhn, T.M., Otis, G.W., Turk, T., et al. 2007. Behaviors of adult Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Great Lakes Entomologist, 40: 1–16.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Saona, C., Poland, T.M., Miller, J.R., Stelinski, L.L., Grant, G.G., de Groot, P., et al. 2006. Behavioral and electrophysiological responses of the emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis, to induced volatiles of Manchurian ash, Fraxinus mandshurica. Chemoecology, 16: 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutledge, C.E., Silk, P.J., and Mayo, P.D. In press. Use of contact chemical cues in prey discrimination by Cerceris fumipennis (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae). Entomolgia Experimentalis et Applicata.Google Scholar
Ryall, K.L., Dutkiewicz, D., Silk, P.J., Antunes, P.M., and Ochoa, I. 2013a. Ovarian development of Agrilus planipennis: effects of age and mating status and influence on attraction to host volatiles. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 149: 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryall, K.L., Fidgen, J.G., Silk, P.J., and Scarr, T. 2013b. Efficacy of (3Z)-lactone and/or (3Z)-hexenol at detecting early infestations of Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 147: 126–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryall, K.L., Silk, P.J., Mayo, P., Crook, D., Khrimian, A., Cossé, A.A., et al. 2012. Attraction of Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) to a volatile pheromone: effects of release rate, host volatile and trap placement. Environmental Entomology, 41: 648–656.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scala, A., Allmann, S., Mirabella, R., Haring, M.A., and Schuurink, R.C. 2013. Green leaf volatiles: a plant’s multifunctional weapon against herbivores and pathogens. International Journal of Molecular Science, 14: 17781–17811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schal, C., Sevala, V., Capurro, M., Snyder, T.E., Blomquist, G.J., and Bagnères, G. 2001. Tissue distribution and lipophorin transport of hydrocarbons and sex pheromones in the house fly, Musca domestica [online]. Journal of Insect Science, 1: 12. Available from http://www.insectscience.org/1.12 [accessed 29 July 2014].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silk, P.J., Ryall, K., Lyons, B., Sweeney, J.D., and Wu, J. 2009. A contact sex pheromone component of the emerald ash borer Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Naturwissenschaften, 96: 601–608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silk, P.J., Ryall, K., Mayo, P., Lemay, M., Grant, G.G., Crook, D., et al. 2011. Evidence for a volatile pheromone in Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) that increases attraction to a host foliar volatile. Environmental Entomology, 40: 904–916.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silk, P.J., Sweeney, J.D., Wu, J., Price, J., Gutowski, J.M., and Kettela, E.G. 2007. Evidence for a male-produced pheromone in Tetropium fuscum (F.) and Tetropium cinnamopterum (Kirby) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Naturwissenschaften, 94: 697–701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sweeney, J.D., Silk, P.J., Gutowski, J.M., Wu, J., Lemay, M.A., Mayo, P.D., et al. 2010. Effect of chirality, release rate, and host volatiles on response of Tetropium fuscum (F.), Tetropium cinnamopterum Kirby, and Tetropium castaneum (L.) to the aggregation pheromone, fuscumol. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 36: 1309–1321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taber, D.F. and Qiu, J. 2013. Permaleic acid: Baeyer–Villiger oxidation of cyclododecanone. Journal of Chemical Education, 90: 1103–1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tluczek, A.R., McCullough, D.G., and Poland, T.M. 2011. Influence of host stress on emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) adult density, development, and distribution in Fraxinus pennsylvanica trees. Environmental Entomology, 40: 357–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar