Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T11:31:41.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Semiochemicals for bark beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) management in western North America: where do we go from here?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2020

Nancy E. Gillette  and
Christopher J. Fettig Open the ORCID record for Christopher J. Fettig [Opens in a new window]
Nancy E. Gillette*
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, 800 Buchanan Street, Albany, California, 94710, United States of America
Christopher J. Fettig
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, 1731 Research Drive, Davis, California, 95618, United States of America
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper is intended as an assessment of the state of knowledge and development of semiochemical methods for control of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in western North America and as a roadmap for future research and development in this field. It is based on a keynote presentation given at the symposium Managing Bark and Ambrosia Beetles with Semiochemicals, held in 2018 in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, at the Joint Meeting of the Entomological Society of America, the Entomological Society of Canada, and the Entomological Society of British Columbia. We describe currently available active ingredients, formulations, and release devices. Furthermore, we describe the most urgently needed new products and techniques, and constraints to their further development. Finally, we speculate about opportunities afforded by new advances in microbial synthesis of semiochemicals, streamlining of regulatory processing, and aerial application using unmanned aerial vehicles.

Type
Forum
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 153 , Issue 1: Managing bark and ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) with semiochemicals , February 2021 , pp. 121 - 135
Check for updates
Creative Commons
To the extent this is a work of the US Government, it is not subject to copyright protection within the United States. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Entomological Society of Canada.
Copyright
© The author(s) and United States Department of Agriculture 2020.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Subject editor: Andrew Graves

References

Anderson, C. 2014. Agricultural drones. MIT Technology Review, 117: 58–60.Google Scholar
Anzalone, A.V., Randolph, P.B., Davis, J.R., Sousa, A.A., Koblan, L.W., Levy, J.M., et al. 2019. Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature, 576: 149–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arora, N.K., Verma, M., Prakash, J., and Mishra, J. 2016. Regulation of biopesticides: global concerns and policies. In Bioformulations for sustainable agriculture. Edited by Arora, N., Mehnaz, S., and Balestrini, R.. Springer, New Delhi, India. Pp. 283–299.Google Scholar
Audley, J.P., Bostock, R.M., and Seybold, S.J. 2020. Behavioral response assays of the walnut twig beetle, Pityophthorus juglandis Blackman (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae), reveal an effective semiochemical repellent combination. Journal of Chemical Ecology, in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedard, W.D. and Wood, D.L. 1981. Suppression of Dendroctonus brevicomis by using a mass-trapping tactic. In Management of insect pests with semiochemicals. Edited by Mitchell, E.R.. Plenum Press, New York, New York, United States of America. Pp. 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bento, J.M., Parra, J.R., de Miranda, S.H., Adami, A.C., Vilela, E.F., and Leal, W.S. 2016. How much is a pheromone worth? F1000 Research, 5: 1763.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bentz, B.J., Kegley, S., Gibson, K., and Thier, R. 2005. A test of high-dose verbenone for stand-level protection of lodgepole and whitebark pine from mountain pine beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) attacks. Journal of Economic Entomology, 98: 1614–1621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bentz, B.J., Lister, C.K., Schmid, J.M., Mata, S.A., Rasmussen, L.A, and Haneman, D. 1989. Does verbenone reduce mountain pine beetle attacks in susceptible stands of ponderosa pine? Research Note RM-RN-495. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America. 4 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentz, B.J., Logan, J., MacMahon, J., Allen, C.D., Ayres, M., Berg, E., et al. 2009. Bark beetle outbreaks in western North America: causes and consequences. In Bark Beetle Symposium; Snowbird, Utah; November, 2005. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America. 42 pp.Google Scholar
Bentz, B.J., Régnière, J., Fettig, C.J., Hansen, E.M., Hayes, J.L., Hicke, J.A., et al. 2010. Climate change and bark beetles of the western United States and Canada: direct and indirect effects. BioScience, 60: 602–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borden, J.H. 1985. Aggregation pheromones. In Comprehensive insect physiology biochemistry & pharmacology, volume 9. Edited by Kerkut, G.A. and Gilbert, L.I.. Pergamon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom. Pp. 257–285.Google Scholar
Borden, J.H. 1997. Disruption of semiochemical-mediated aggregation in bark beetles. In Insect pheromone research: new directions. Edited by Cardé, R.T. and Minks, A.K.. Chapman & Hall, New York, New York, United States of America. Pp. 421–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borden, J.H., Birmingham, A.L., and Burleigh, J.S. 2006. Evaluation of the push–pull tactic against the mountain pine beetle using verbenone and non-host volatiles in combination with pheromone-baited trees. The Forestry Chronicle, 82: 579–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borden, J.H., Chong, L.J., Earle, T.J., and Huber, D.P.W. 2003. Protection of lodgepole pine from attack by the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), using high doses of verbenone in combination with nonhost bark volatiles. The Forestry Chronicle, 79: 685–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borden, J.H., Wilson, I.M., Gries, R., Chong, L.J., and Pierce, H.D. Jr. 1998. Volatiles from the bark of trembling aspen, Populus tremuloides Michx., disrupt secondary attraction by the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Chemoecology, 8: 69–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, T.J.A., Aradottir, G.I., Smart, L.E., Martin, J.L., Caulfield, J.C., Doherty, A., et al. 2015. The first crop plant genetically engineered to release an insect pheromone for defence. Scientific Reports, 5: 11183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, M. and Keasling, J.D. 2006. Production of isoprenoid pharmaceuticals by engineered microbes. Nature Chemical Biology, 2: 674–681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ding, B.-J., Hofvander, P., Wang, H.-L., Durrett, T. P., Stymne, S., and Löfstedt, C. 2014. A plant factory for pheromone production. Nature Communications, 5: 3353. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doudna, J.A. and Charpentier, E. 2014. Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science, 346: 1258096.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El-Sayed, A.M. 2020. The Pherobase: database of pheromones and semiochemicals [online]. Available from www.pherobase.com [accessed 15 January 2020].Google Scholar
Fettig, C.J, Bulaon, B.M., Dabney, C.P., Hayes, C.J., and McKelvey, S.R. 2012a. Verbenone Plus reduces levels of tree mortality attributed to mountain pine beetle infestations in whitebark pine, a tree species of concern. Journal of Biofertilizers and Biopesticides, 3: 1–5.Google Scholar
Fettig, C.J. and Hilszczański, J. 2015. Management strategies for bark beetles in conifer forests. In Bark beetles: biology and ecology of native and invasive species. Edited by Vega, F.E. and Hofstetter, R.W.. Springer, London, United Kingdom. Pp. 555–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fettig, C.J., McKelvey, S.R., Borys, R.R., Dabney, C.P., Hamud, S.M., Nelson, L.J., and Seybold, S.J. 2009a. Efficacy of verbenone for protecting ponderosa pine stands from western pine beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae) attack in California. Journal of Economic Entomology, 102: 1846−1858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fettig, C.J., McKelvey, S.R., Dabney, C.P., Borys, R.R., and Huber, D.P.W. 2009b. Response of Dendroctonus brevicomis to different release rates of nonhost angiosperm volatiles and verbenone in trapping and tree protection studies. Journal of Applied Entomology, 133: 143–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fettig, C.J., McKelvey, S.R., Dabney, C.P., Huber, D.P.W., Lait, C.G., Fowler, D.L., and Borden, J.H. 2012b. Efficacy of “Verbenone Plus” for protecting ponderosa pine trees and stands from Dendroctonus brevicomis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) attack in British Columbia and California. Journal of Economic Entomology, 105: 1668–1680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fettig, C.J., Munson, A.S, Reinke, M., and Mafra-Neto, A. 2015. A novel semiochemical tool for protecting Pinus contorta from mortality attributed to Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 108: 173−182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fettig, C.J., Steed, B.E., Bulaon, B.M., Mortenson, L.A, Progar, R.A., Bradley, C., et al. 2016. The efficacy of SPLAT® Verb for protecting individual Pinus contorta, Pinus ponderosa, and Pinus lambertiana from colonization by Dendroctonus ponderosae . Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia, 113: 11–20.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2013. Advancement of pesticide regulatory management in Asia [online]. RAP Publication, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, Thailand. 318 pp. Available from http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3323e.pdf%20%5baccessed%2021 [accessed 21 January 2020].Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2019. Codex looks to harmonise regulation of biopesticides [online]. Available from www.fao.org/3/a-i2806e.pdf [accessed 20 January 2020].Google Scholar
Foote, G.G., Fettig, C.J., Ross, D.W., Runyon, J.B., Coleman, T.W., Gaylord, M.L., et al. 2020. A biodegradable formulation of MCH (3-methylcyclohex-2-en-1-one) for protecting Pseudotsuga menziesii from Dendroctonus pseudotsugae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) colonization. Journal of Economic Entomology, 113: 1858–1863.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frederiksa, C. and Wesselerb, J.H.H. 2019. A comparison of the EU and US regulatory frameworks for the active substance registration of microbial biological control agents. Pest Management Science, 75: 87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillette, N.E., Erbilgin, N., Webster, J.N., Pederson, L., Mori, S.R., Stein, J.D., et al. 2009a. Aerially applied verbenone-releasing laminated flakes protect Pinus contorta stands from attack by Dendroctonus ponderosae in California and Idaho. Forest Ecology and Management, 257: 1405–1412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillette, N.E., Hansen, E.M., Mehmel, C.J., Mori, S.R., Webster, J.N., Erbilgin, N., and Wood, D.L. 2012a. Area-wide application of verbenone-releasing flakes reduces mortality of whitebark pine Pinus albicaulis caused by the mountain pine beetle Dendroctonus ponderosae . Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 14: 367–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillette, N.E., Kegley, S.J., Costello, S.L., Mori, S.R., Webster, J.N., Mehmel, C.J., and Wood, D.L. 2014a. Efficacy of verbenone and green leaf volatiles for protecting whitebark and limber pines from attack by mountain pine beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). Environmental Entomology, 43: 1019–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillette, N.E., Mehmel, C.J., Mori, S.R., Webster, J.N., Wood, D.L., Erbilgin, N., and Owen, D.R. 2012b. The push–pull tactic for mitigation of mountain pine beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) damage in lodgepole and whitebark pines. Environmental Entomology, 41: 1575–1586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillette, N.E., Mehmel, C.J., Webster, J.N., Mori, S.R., Erbilgin, N., Wood, D.L., and Stein, J.D. 2009b. Aerially applied methylcyclohexenone-releasing flakes protect Pseudotsuga menziesii stands from attack by Dendroctonus pseudotsugae . Forest Ecology and Management, 257: 1231–1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillette, N.E. and Munson, A.S. 2009. Semiochemical sabotage: behavioral chemicals for protection of western conifers from bark beetles. In The Western Bark Beetle Research Group: a unique collaboration with Forest Health Protection. Edited by Hayes, J.L. and Lundquist, J.E.. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-784. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Oregon, United States of America. Pp. 85–109.Google Scholar
Gillette, N.E., Murray, W., Kelly, J.M., Webster, J.N., and Mori, S.R. 2009c. Final report: brood tree removal and verbenone treatments, Smuggler Mountain 2009 [online]. Available from www.fs.fed.us/psw/publications/gillette/2009_gillette_SmugglerMtReport.pdf [accessed 20 January 2020].Google Scholar
Gillette, N.E., Stein, J.D., Owen, D.R., Webster, J.N., Fiddler, G.O., Mori, S.L., and Wood, D.L. 2006. Verbenone-releasing flakes protect individual Pinus contorta trees from attack by Dendroctonus ponderosae and Dendroctonus valens (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 8: 243–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillette, N.E., Wood, D.L., Hines, S.J., Runyon, J.B., and Negrón, J.F. 2014b. The once and future forest: consequences of mountain pine beetle treatment decisions. Forest Science, 60: 527–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graves, A.D., Holsten, E.H., Ascerno, M.E., Zogas, K.P., Hard, J.S., Huber, D.P.W., et al. 2008. Protection of spruce from colonization by the bark beetle, Ips perturbatus, in Alaska. Forest Ecology and Management, 256: 1825–1839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, D.R. and Borden, J.H. 1989. Containment and concentration of mountain pine beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) infestations with semiochemicals: validation by sampling of baited and surrounding zones. Journal of Economic Entomology, 93: 1399–1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, E.M., Munson, A.S., Blackford, D.C., Graves, A.D., Coleman, T.W., and Baggett, L.S. 2017. 3-Methylcyclohex-2-en-1-one for area and individual tree protection against spruce beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) attack in the southern Rocky Mountains. Journal of Economic Entomology, 110: 2140–2148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hansen, E.M., Munson, A.S., Blackford, D.C., Wakarchuk, D., and Baggett, L.S. 2016. Lethal trap trees and semiochemical repellents as area host protection strategies for spruce beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae) in Utah. Journal of Economic Entomology, 109: 2137–2144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, E.M., Munson, A.S., Wakarchuk, D., Blackford, D.C., Graves, A.D., Stephens, S.S., and Moan, J.E. 2019. Advances in semiochemical repellents to mitigate host mortality from the spruce beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 112: 2253–2261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, R. 2017. Unmanned aerial vehicles in forestry – reaching for a new perspective. New Zealand Journal of Forestry, 62: 31–39.Google Scholar
Hicke, J.A., Meddens, A.J., and Kolden, C.A. 2016. Recent tree mortality in the western United States from bark beetles and forest fires. Forest Science, 62: 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holsten, E.H., Shea, P.J., and Borys, R.R. 2003. MCH released in a novel pheromone dispenser prevents spruce beetle, Dendroctonus rufipennis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), attacks in south-central Alaska. Journal of Economic Entomology, 96: 31–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holsten, E.H., Webb, W., Shea, P.J., and Werner, W.A. 2002. Release rates of methylcyclohexenone and verbenone from bubblecap and bead releasers under field conditions suitable for the management of bark beetles in California, Oregon, and Alaska. Research Paper PNW-RP-544. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Oregon, United States of America. 21 pp.Google Scholar
Huber, D.P.W. and Borden, J.H. 2001a. Angiosperm bark volatiles disrupt response of Douglas-fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae, to attractant-baited traps. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 27: 217–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huber, D.P.W. and Borden, J.H. 2001b. Protection of lodgepole pines from mass attack by mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae, with nonhost angiosperm volatiles and verbenone. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 99: 131–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, D.P.W., Borden, J.H., Jeans-Williams, N.L., and Gries, R. 2000. Differential bioactivity of conophthorin on four species of North American bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). The Canadian Entomologist, 132: 649–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, D.P.W., Borden, J.H., and Stastny, M. 2001. Response of the pine engraver, Ips pini (Say) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), to conophthorin and other angiosperm bark volatiles in the avoidance of nonhosts. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 3: 225–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jadhav, S.R., Chiou, B.-S., Wood, D., DeGrande-Hoffman, G., Glenn, G.M., and John, G. 2011. Molecular gels-based controlled release devices for pheromones. Soft Matter, 7: 864–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakočiūnas, T., Jensen, M.K., and Keasling, J.D. 2016. CRISPR/Cas9 advances engineering of microbial cell factories. Metabolic Engineering, 34: 44–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jamieson, M.A., Trowbridge, A.M., Raffa, K.F., and Lindroth, R.L. 2012. Consequences of climate warming and altered precipitation patterns for plant–insect and multitrophic interactions. Plant Physiology, 160: 1719–1727.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kegley, S. and Gibson, K. 2009. Individual-tree tests of verbenone and green-leaf volatiles to protect lodgepole, whitebark and ponderosa pines, 2004–2007. Forest Health Protection Report 09–03. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Forest Health Protection, Missoula, Montana, United States of America. 12 pp.Google Scholar
Kegley, S., Gibson, K., Gillette, N.E., Webster, J., Pederson, L., and Mori, S. 2010. Individual-tree tests of verbenone flakes, verbenone pouches, and green-leaf volatiles to protect lodgepole pines from mountain pine beetle attack. Forest Health Protection Report 10–02. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Forest Health Protection, Missoula, Montana, United States of America. 12 pp.Google Scholar
King, A. 2017. Technology: the future of agriculture. Nature, 544: S21–S23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirby, J. and Keasling, J.D. 2009. Biosynthesis of plant isoprenoids: perspectives for microbial engineering. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 60: 335–355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kislaya, A. and Goutam, R. 2019. An autonomous UAV for pesticide spraying. International Journal of Trends in Scientific Research and Development, 3: 986–990.Google Scholar
Kolb, T.E., Fettig, C.J., Ayres, M.P., Bentz, B.J., Hicke, J.A., Mathiasen, R., et al. 2016. Observed and anticipated impacts of drought on forest insects and diseases in the United States. Forest Ecology and Management, 380: 321–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindgren, B.S., Borden, J.H, Cushon, G.H., Chong, L.J., and Higgins, C.J. 1989a. Reduction of mountain pine beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) attacks by verbenone in lodgepole pine stands in British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 19: 65–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindgren, B.S., McGregor, M.D., Oakes, R.D., and Meyer, H.E. 1989b. Suppression of spruce beetle attacks by MCH released from bubble caps. Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 4: 49–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macek, T., Kotrba, P., Svatos, A., Novakova, M., Demnerova, K., and Mackova, M. 2008. Novel roles for genetically modified plants in environmental protection. Trends in Biotechnology, 26: 146–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mafra-Neto, A., de Lame, F.M., Fettig, C.J., Munson, A.S., Pering, T.M., Stelinski, L.L., et al. 2013. Manipulation of insect behavior with Specialized Lure Application Technology (SPLAT®). In Natural products for pest management. Edited by Beck, J., Coats, J., Duke, S., and Koivunen, M.. American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C., United States of America. Pp. 31–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mafra-Neto, A., Fettig, C.J., Munson, A.S., Rodriguez-Saona, C., Holdcraft, R., Faleiro, J.R., et al. 2014. Development of specialized pheromone and lure application technologies (SPLAT®) for management of coleopteran pests in agricultural and forest systems. In Biopesticides: state of the art and future opportunities. Edited by Gross, A., Coats, J., Beck, J., and Duke, S.. American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C., United States of America. Pp. 211–242.Google Scholar
Morris, J.L., Cottrell, S.C., Fettig, C.J., DeRose, R.J., Mattor, K.M., Carter, V.A., et al. 2018. Bark beetles as agents of change in social–ecological systems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 16(S1): S34–S43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Negrón, J.F., Allen, K., McMillin, J., and Burkwhat, H. 2006. Testing verbenone for reducing mountain pine beetle attacks in ponderosa pine in the Black Hills, South Dakota. Research Note RMRS-RN-31. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America. 7 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odong, M. 2009. Southern and East African Regulatory Committee on Harmonization of Pesticide Registration. Online Powerpoint presentation at MRL Workshop, Alexandria, Egypt, March 30–April 2, 2009 [online]. Available from www.ir4.rutgers.edu/gmus/MRLWorkshop/SOUTHERN%20AND%20EAST%20AFRICAN%20PERSPECTIVE.pdf [accessed 20 January 2020].Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2019. Agricultural pesticides programme [online]. Available from https://www.oecd.org/env/ehs/pesticides-biocides/agriculturalpesticidesprogramme.htm [accessed on 29 February 2020].Google Scholar
Olson, S. 2015. An analysis of the biopesticide market now and where it is going. Outlooks on Pest Management, 26: 203–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Progar, R.A. 2005. Five-year operational trial of verbenone to deter mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae; Coleoptera: Scolytidae) attack of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta). Environmental Entomology, 34: 1402–1407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Progar, R.A., Blackford, D.C., Cluck, D.R, Costello, S., Dunning, L.B., Eager, T., et al. 2013. Population densities and tree diameter effects associated with verbenone treatments to reduce mountain pine beetle-caused mortality of lodgepole pine. Journal of Economic Entomology, 106: 221–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Progar, R.A., Gillette, N.E., Fettig, C.J., and Hrinkevich, K. 2014. Applied chemical ecology of the mountain pine beetle. Forest Science, 60: 414–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Progar, R.A., Sturdevant, N., and Rinella, M.J. 2010. Trapping Douglas-fir beetle (Dendroctonus pseudotsugae) with pheromone-baited multiple funnel traps does not reduce Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) mortality. The Pan-Pacific Entomologist, 86: 111–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raffa, K.F., Aukema, B.H., Bentz, B.J., Carroll, A.L., Hicke, J.A., Turner, M.G., and Romme, W.H. 2008. Cross-scale drivers of natural disturbances prone to anthropogenic amplification: dynamics of biome-wide bark beetle eruptions. BioScience, 58: 501–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, D.W, Daterman, G.E., and Munson, A.S. 1996. Optimal dose of an antiaggregation pheromone (3-methylcyclohex-2-en-1-one) for protecting live Douglas-fir from attack by Dendroctonus pseudotsugae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 89: 1204–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, D.W., Daterman, G.E., and Munson, A.S. 2002. Elution rate and spacing of antiaggregation pheromone dispensers for protecting live trees from Dendroctonus pseudotsugae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 95: 778–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, D.W., Daterman, G.E., and Munson, A.S. 2004. Evaluation of the antiaggregation pheromone, 3-methylcyclohex-2-en-1-one (MCH), to protect live spruce from spruce beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) infestation in southern Utah. Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia, 101: 145–146.Google Scholar
Sánchez Martínez, G. 2018. Bases para el manejo integral del descortezador Dendroctonus pseudotsugae en México [online]. Available from www.researchgate.net/publication/326107113_Bases_para_el_manejo_integral_del_descortezador_Dendroctonus_pseudotsugae_en_Mexico [accessed 19 January 2020].Google Scholar
Sánchez Martínez, G., Mehmel, C.J., Gillette, N.E., González Gaona, E., López, S.R., Alanís Morales, H.E., et al. 2012. Fundamentos para el control integral del descortezador Dendroctonus pseudotsugae barragani Furniss en México Folleto Técnico núm. 46. INIFAP-CIRNOC-Campo Experimental Pabellón, Aguascalientes, México. ISBN: 978-607-425-797-7.Google Scholar
Schlyter, F. 2012. Semiochemical diversity in practice: antiattractant semiochemicals reduce bark beetle attacks on standing trees: a first meta-analysis. Psyche, 2012: 268621.Google Scholar
Seybold, S.J., Bentz, B.J., Fettig, C.J., Lundquist, J.E., Progar, R.A., and Gillette, N.E. 2018. Management of western North American bark beetles with semiochemicals. Annual Review of Entomology, 63: 407–432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seybold, S.J., Bohlmann, J., and Raffa, K.F. 2000. Biosynthesis of coniferophagous bark beetle pheromones and conifer isoprenoids: evolutionary perspective and synthesis. The Canadian Entomologist, 132: 697–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seybold, S.J., Huber, D.P.W., Lee, J.C., Graves, A.D., and Bohlmann, J. 2006. Pine monoterpenes and pine bark beetles: a marriage of convenience for defense and chemical communication. Phytochemistry Reviews, 5: 143–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, R.M. 1981. Pheromones: background and potential for use in insect pest control. Science, 213: 1326–1332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silverstein, R.M., Brownlee, R.G., Bellas, T.E., Wood, D.L., and Browne, L.E. 1968. Brevicomin: principal sex attractant in the frass of the female western pine beetle. Science, 158: 889–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, R.M., Rodin, J.O., and Wood, D.L. 1966. Sex attractants in frass produced by male Ips confusus in ponderosa pine. Science, 154: 509–510.Google Scholar
Strauss, S.H., Costanza, A., and Séguin, A. 2015. Genetically engineered trees: paralysis from good intentions. Science, 349: 794–795.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Unelius, C.R., Schiebe, C., Bohman, B., Andersson, M.N., and Schlyter, F. 2014. Non-host volatile blend optimization for forest protection against the European spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus . PLOS One, 9: e85381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
United States Code of Federal Regulations. 2019. United States Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40 – Protection of Environment, volume 26, part 158. Data Requirements for Pesticides Subpart U – Biochemical Pesticides. Available from www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2019-title40-vol26/pdf/CFR-2019-title40-vol26.pdf. [accessed 8 May 2020].Google Scholar
United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2016. NAFTA TWG Five-year strategy 2016–2021 [online]. Available from www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016–01/documents/nafta-5yr-strategic-plan.pdf [accessed 22 January 2020].Google Scholar
United States Government Printing Office. 2012. 40 CFR 180.1122. Inert ingredients of semiochemical release dispensers; exemption from the requirement of a tolerance [online]. Available from www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CFR-2012-title40-vol25/CFR-2012-title40-vol25-sec180–1122 [accessed 27 January 2020].Google Scholar
Vose, J.M., Peterson, D.L., Domke, G.M., Fettig, C.J., Joyce, L.A., Keane, R.E., et al. 2018. Forests. In Impacts, risks, and adaptation in the United States: Fourth National Climate Assessment, volume II. Edited by Reidmiller, D.R., Avery, C.W., Easterling, D.R., Kunkel, K.E., Lewis, K.L.M., Maycock, T.K., and B.C. Stewart. United States Global Change Research Program, Washington, D.C., United States of America. Pp. 223–258.Google Scholar
Wood, D.L. 1982. The role of pheromones, kairomones, and allomones in the host selection and colonization behavior of bark beetles. Annual Review of Entomology, 27: 411–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, D.L, Stark, R.W., Waters, W.W., Bedard, W.D., and Cobb, F.W. Jr. 1985. Treatment tactics and strategies. In Integrated pest management in pine-bark beetle ecosystems. Edited by Waters, W.W., Stark, R.W., and Wood, D.L.. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, New York, United States of America. Pp. 121–140.Google Scholar
Zada, A., Falach, L., and Byers, J.A. 2009. Development of sol-gel formulations for slow release of pheromones. Chemoecology, 19: 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar