Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T00:30:45.514Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SEASONAL OCCURRENCE AND ABUNDANCE IN A COMMUNITY OF WILD BEES FROM AN OLD FIELD HABITAT IN SOUTHERN ONTARIO

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

P.A. MacKay
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg R3T 2N2
G. Knerer
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A1

Abstract

An apoidean community in southern Ontario was intensively sampled over two seasons. One hundred and forty-one species in six families were collected. The species–abundance relationship exhibited a log-normal distribution. Flight activity began before late April and continued past late September. Most species were active for only a brief portion of that period. The most abundant species were known to be primitively social. Thirty-six of the species were parasitic bees. A number of other specialized parasitoids of the orders Diptera, Coleoptera, and Hymenoptera were recorded.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Camras, S. 1944. Notes on the North American species of the Zodion fulvifrons group (Diptera:Conopidae). Pan-Pacif. Ent. 20: 121128.Google Scholar
Camras, S. 1945. A study of the genus Occemyia in North America (Diptera:Conopidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 38: 216222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curran, C.H. 1934. Families and genera of North American Diptera. 2nd ed. Henry Tripp, Woodhaven, N.Y.515 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knerer, G. and Atwood, C.E.. 1962. The males of Dialictus laevissimus (Smith) and D. rohweri (Ellis) (Hymenoptera:Halictidae). Can. Ent. 94: 12281231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knerer, G. and Atwood, C.E.. 1963 a. Four males of Andrena (Hymenoptera:Andrenidae). Can. Ent. 95: 583587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knerer, G. and Atwood, C.E.. 1963 b. The male of Dialictus heterognathus Mitchell (Hymenoptera:Halictidae). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 65: 167168.Google Scholar
Knerer, G. and Atwood, C.E.. 1966. Additional descriptions in the genus Dialictus Robertson (Hymenoptera:Halictidae). Can. Ent. 98: 881887.Google Scholar
Krombein, K.V. 1967. Trap-nesting wasps and bees. Life histories, nests, and associates. Smithsonian Press, Washington, D.C.570 pp.Google Scholar
Linsley, E.G. 1958. The ecology of solitary bees. Hilgardia 27: 541599.Google Scholar
May, R.M. 1975. Patterns of species abundance and diversity. pp. 81120in Cody, M.L. and Diamond, J.M. (Eds.), Ecology and evolution of communities. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Michener, C.D. 1969. Comparative social behaviour of bees. A. Rev. Ent. 14: 299342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michener, C.D. 1974. The social behavour of the bees: a comparative study. Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge. 404 pp.Google Scholar
Mitchell, L.B. 1960. Bees of the eastern United States. Volume 1. Bull. N.C. agric. Exp. Stn. 141. 538 pp.Google Scholar
Mitchell, L.B. 1962. Bees of the eastern United States. Volume II. Bull. N.C. agric. Exp. Stn. 152. 527 pp.Google Scholar
Preston, F.W. 1948. The commonness and rarity of species. Ecology 29: 254283.Google Scholar
Sakagami, S.F. and Michener, C.D.. 1962. The nest architecture of the sweat bees; a comparative study of behaviour. Univ. Kansas Press, Lawrence. 135 pp.Google Scholar