Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:46:53.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A REVIEW OF THE SPIDER GENUS PHILODROMUS IN THE AMERICAS (ARANEIDA: PHILODROMIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

C. D. Dondale  and
J. H. Redner
C. D. Dondale
Affiliation:
Biosystematics Research Institute, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa
J. H. Redner
Affiliation:
Biosystematics Research Institute, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Philodromus Walckenaer 1826 and its seven component species groups in the Americas are defined and diagnosed. The 12 species of the aureolus group are keyed, diagnosed, and mapped. P. obscurus Blackwail, 1871 is placed in synonymy under P. cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802). P. lutulentus Gertsch, 1934 is raised to species status from synonymy under P. laticeps Keyserling, 1880, and P. eremus Buckle, 1973 is placed in synonymy under P. lutulentus. P. agreutes Schick, 1965 is placed in synonymy under P. californicus Keyserling, 1884, and P. decolor O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1899 under P. satullus Keyserling, 1880. The South American species P. fuliginosus Nicolet in Gay, 1849, P. junior Nicolet in Gay, 1849, and P. meridionalis Keyserling, 1891 are removed to the genus Petrichus, and P. setosus Petrunkevitch, 1929 is removed to the genus Thanatus, where it becomes a junior synonym of T. vulgaris Simon, 1870.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 108 , Issue 2 , February 1976 , pp. 127 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banks, N. 1895. A list of spiders of Long Island, with description of new species. Jl N.Y. ent. Soc. 3: 76–93.Google Scholar
Banks, N. 1901. Some spiders and other Arachnida from southern Arizona. Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 23: 581–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackwall, J. 1846. Notice of spiders captured by Professor Potter in Canada, with descriptions of such species as appear to be new to science. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. 17: 30–44, 76–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackwall, J. 1871. Notice of spiders captured by Miss Hunter in Montreal, Upper Canada, with descriptions of species supposed to be new to arachnologists. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. 8: 429–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnet, P. 1957–1959. Bibliographia Araneorum. Tome 2, pts. 3–5. Les Frères Douladoure, Toulouse.Google Scholar
Braun, R. 1965. Beitrag zu einer Revision der paläarktischen Arten der Philodromus aureolus — Gruppe (Arach., Araneae). Senck. biol. 46: 369–428.Google Scholar
Bryant, E. B. 1933. New and little known spiders from the United States. Bull. Mus. comp. Zool. Harv. 74: 171–193.Google Scholar
Buckle, D. 1973. A new Philodromus (Araneae: Thomisidae) from Arizona. J. Arachnol. 1: 142–143.Google Scholar
Chamberlin, R. V. 1924. Descriptions of new American and Chinese spiders, with notes on other Chinese species. Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 63: 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlin, R. V. and Gertsch, W. J.. 1928. Notes on spiders from southeastern Utah. Proc. biol. Soc. Wash. 41: 175–188.Google Scholar
Chamberlin, R. V. and Ivie, W.. 1944. Spiders of the Georgia region. Bull. Univ. Utah. biol. Ser. 1(5). 267 pp.Google Scholar
Dondale, C. D. 1961 a. Revision of the aureolus group of the genus Philodromus (Araneae: Thomisidae) in North America. Can. Ent. 93: 199–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dondale, C. D. 1961 b. Life histories of some common spiders from trees and shrubs in Nova Scotia. Can. J. Zool. 39: 777–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dondale, C. D. 1964. Sexual behavior and its application to a species problem in the spider genus Philodromus (Araneae: Thomisidae). Can. J. Zool. 42: 817–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dondale, C. D. 1967. Sexual behavior and the classification of the Philodromus rufus complex in North America (Araneida: Thomisidae). Can. J. Zool. 45: 453–459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dondale, C. D. 1972. Laboratory breeding between European and North American populations of the spider Philodromus rufus Walckenaer (Araneida: Thomisidae). Bull. Br. Arach. Soc. 2: 49–52.Google Scholar
Dondale, C. D. and Redner, J. H.. 1968. The imbecillus and rufus groups of the spider genus Philodromus in North America (Araneida: Thomisidae). Mem. ent. Soc. Can., No. 55. 78 pp.Google Scholar
Dondale, C. D. 1969. The infuscatus and dispar groups of the spider genus Philodromus in North and Central America and the West Indies (Araneida: Thomisidae). Can. Ent. 101: 921–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dondale, C. D. 1975 a. The fuscomarginatus and histrio groups of the spider genus Philodromus in North America (Araneida: Thomisidae). Can. Ent. 107: 369–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dondale, C. D. 1975 b. Revision of the spider genus Apollophanes (Araneida, Thomisidae). Can. Ent. 107: 1175–1192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerton, J. H. 1892. New England spiders of the family Thomisidae. Trans. Conn. Acad. Arts Sci. 8: 359–381.Google Scholar
Emerton, J. H. 1917. New spiders from Canada and the adjoining States. Can. Ent. 49: 261–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gertsch, W. J. 1933. New genera and species of North American spiders. Am. Mus. Novit. 636. 28 pp.Google Scholar
Gertsch, W. J. 1934. Notes on American crab spiders. Am. Mus. Novit. 707. 25 pp.Google Scholar
Gertsch, W. J. 1939. A revision of the typical crab-spiders (Misumeninae) of America north of Mexico. Bull. Am. Mus. nat. Hist. 76: 277–442.Google Scholar
Haynes, D. L. and Sisojević, P.. 1966. Predatory behavior of Philodromus rufus Walckenaer (Araneae: Thomisidae). Can. Ent. 98: 113–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homann, H. 1975. Stellung der Thomisidae und der Philodromidae im System der Araneae (Chelicerata, Arachnida). Z. Morph. Tiere 80: 181–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaston, B. J. 1948. Spiders of Connecticut. Bull. Conn. St. geol. nat. Hist. Surv. 70. 874 pp.Google Scholar
Keyserling, E. 1880. Die Spinnen Amerikas. Laterigradae. Bauer and Raspe, Nürnburg.Google Scholar
Keyserling, E. 1884. Neue Spinnen aus Amerika. V. Verh. zool.-bot. Ges. Wien 33: 649–684.Google Scholar
Koch, C. L. 1837. Uebersicht des Arachnidensystems. Heft 1. Nürnberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mello-Leitão, C. F. 1929. Aphantochilidas e Thomisidas do Brasil. Arch. Mus. nac., Rio de J. 31: 9–359.Google Scholar
Pickard-Cambridge, O. 1899. Arachnida: Araneida. Biologia cent.-am. Zool. 1: 289–304.Google Scholar
Putman, W. L. 1967. Life histories and habits of two species of Philodromus (Araneida: Thomisidae) in Ontario. Can. Ent. 99: 622–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roewer, C. F. 1954. Katalog der Araneae. Band 2, Abt. a. Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Scheffer, T. H. 1904. A new genus of spiders. Can. Ent. 36: 305–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schick, R. X. 1965. The crab spiders of California (Araneida: Thomisidae). Bull. Am. Mus. nat. Hist. 129. 180 pp.Google Scholar
Simon, E. 1895. Histoire naturelle des araignées. Tome 1, fasc. 4. Encyclopédie Roret, Paris.Google Scholar
Simon, E. 1896. Arachnides recueillis à la Terre de feu par M. Carlos Backhausen. An. Mus. nac. Hist. nat. B. Aires 5: 141–145.Google Scholar
Thorell, T. 1869. On European spiders …. Nova Acta R. Soc. Scient. upsal. 7. 108 pp.Google Scholar
Vogel, B. R. 1967. A list of new North American spiders 1940-1966. Mem. Am. ent. Soc. 23. 186 pp.Google Scholar
Walckenaer, C. A. 1802. Faune Parisienne, Insectes. Tome 2. Paris.Google Scholar
Walckenaer, C. A. 1805. Tableau des Aranéides. Paris.Google Scholar
Walckenaer, C. A. 1826. Faune française. Livr. 11, 12. Encyclopédie de Roret, Paris.Google Scholar
Walckenaer, C. A. 1837. Histoire naturelle des insectes. Aptères. Tome 1. Librairie Encyclopédique de Roret, Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar