Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:32:29.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE RESPONSE OF TWO STRAINS OF HYLEMYA ANTIQUA (DIPTERA: ANTHOMYIIDAE) TO A CONSTANT AND AN ALTERNATING TEMPERATURE REGIME

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Alan S. Robinson  and
G. Zurlini
Alan S. Robinson
Affiliation:
Association Euratom-ITAL, Wageningen, The Netherlands
G. Zurlini
Affiliation:
Association Euratom-ITAL, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of an alternating and a constant temperature regime on some aspects of the biology of two strains of Hylemya antiqua were studied. One strain was a laboratory strain, the other a newly colonized wild strain. Several population statistics were assessed and life tables constructed. Significant differences between the strains were recorded.

The laboratory strain mated significantly better under both environments than the wild strain, it also oviposited earlier and lived longer. No difference between the strains was recorded for either total egg production or oviposition rate. The wild strain larvae survived significantly better than the laboratory strain larvae and produced larger pupae. As the weighted mean temperature of the alternating regime was 16.6°C compared with the constant regime of 23°C many temperature dependent processes were retarded. Nevertheless as the alternating temperature increased larval survival and increased pupal size, this temperature regime has now been adopted for the routine laboratory rearing of H. antiqua larvae. The net reproductive rate, R0, and the intrinsic rate of increase, r, were calculated for both strains in both environments. The wild flies had the highest R0 at the alternating temperature and the lowest at the constant temperature. This trend was completely reversed when r was calculated as this statistic takes into account generation time, which was much shorter in the constant temperature.

The results were discussed in the framework of the quality of the laboratory stock in relation to its use in a genetic control programme.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 111 , Issue 11 , November 1979 , pp. 1207 - 1217
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Birch, L. C. 1948. The intrinsic rate of natural increase of an insect population. J. Animal Ecol. 17: 15–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boller, E. 1972. Behavioural aspects of mass-rearing of insects. Entomophaga 17: 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, D. L. 1975. Quality in mass produced insects. In International Atomic Energy Agency Panel Proc. “Controlling fruit flies by the Sterile Insect Technique”, Vienna 1974, pp. 19–32.Google Scholar
Chambers, D. L. 1977. Quality control in mass rearing. A. Rev. Ent. 22: 284–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrmann, L. 1964. Genetic divergence in M. Vetukhiv's experimental population of Drosophila pseudobscuda. I. Rudiments of sexual isolation. Genet. Res. 5: 150–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, L. W., Claborn, H. V., Turner, J. P., and Lopez, E.. 1968. Differences in response of two strains of screwworm flies to the male pheromone. J. econ. Ent. 61: 1386–1388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagstrum, D. W. and Hagstrum, W. R.. 1970. A simple device for producing fluctuating temperatures with an evaluation of the ecological significance of fluctuating temperatures. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 63: 1385–1389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hagstrum, D. W. and Leach, C. F.. 1973. Role of constant and fluctuating temperature in determining developmental time and fecundity of 3 species of stored products Coleoptera. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 66: 407–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heemert, C. van and Wijnands-Stäb, K. J. A.. 1975. Radiation induced semi-sterility for genetic control purposes in the onion fly Hylemya antiqua. II. Induction, isolation and cytogenetic analysis of new chromosomal rearrangements. Theoret. Appl. Genet. 45: 749–754.Google Scholar
Huettel, M. D. 1976. Monitoring quality of laboratory-reared insects: A biological and behavioural perspective. Environ. Ent. 5: 807–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. 1965. Selection for colonizing ability. In Baker, H. G. and Stebbins, G. L. (Eds.), Genetics of Colonizing Species. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Loosjes, M. 1976. Ecology and genetic control of the onion fly, Delia antiqua (Meigen). Ph.D. Thesis, Rijksuniversiteit, Leiden.Google Scholar
Mackauer, M. 1976. Genetic problems in the production of biological control agents. A. Rev. Ent. 21: 364–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minks, A. K. 1971. Decreased sex phenomene production in an inbred strain of the summerfruit tortrix moth, Adoxophyes orana. Entomologia exp. appl. 14: 361–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyashita, K. 1971. Effects of constant and alternating temperature on the development of Spodoptera litura F. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Appl. Ent. Zool. 6: 105–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perron, J. P. and Lafrance, J.. 1961. Notes on the life of the onion maggot Hylemya antiqua (Meigen). (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) reared in field cages. Can. Ent. 93: 101–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raulstron, J. R. 1975. Tobacco budworm; observations on the laboratory adaption of a wild strain. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 68: 139–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raulstron, J. R. 1977 a. Genetic control of Hylemya antiqua I. X-ray induced effects in the F0 and F1 generations. Mut. Res. 42: 79–88.Google Scholar
Raulstron, J. R. 1977 b. Genetic control of Hylemya antiqua II. Can inbreeding depression be a serious obstacle to the development of homozygous rearrangement lines. Entomologia exp. appl. 21: 207–216.Google Scholar
Robinson, A. S. and van Heemert, C.. 1975. Preliminary radiobiological studies in Hylemya antiqua and data on three radiation induced (0.5 krad) chromosomal rearrangements. In International Atomic Energy Agency Symposia “Sterility Principle for Insect Control.” Innsbruck Austria, 1974, pp. 375–385.Google Scholar
Rössler, Y. 1975. The ability to inseminate: a comparison between laboratory reared and field populations of the Meditteranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata. Entomologia exp. appl. 18: 225–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siddiqui, W. A. and Barlow, C. A.. 1972. Population growth of Drosophila melanogaster (Diptera: Drosophilidae) at constant and alternating temperatures. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 65: 993–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ticheler, J. 1971. Rearing of the onion fly, Hylemya antiqua with a view to release of sterilized insects. pp. 341–346in Sterility Principle for Insect Control or Eradication. IAEA, Vienna.Google Scholar
Welbers, P. 1975. Der Einfluss von tagesperiodischen Wechseltemperaturem bei der Motte, Pectinophora I. Entwicklungsdauer, Larvengewicht und Reproktionsrate. Oecologia (Berl.) 21: 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wijnands-Stäb, K. J. A. and van Heemert, C.. 1974. Radiation induced semi-sterility for genetic control purposes in the onion fly Hylemya antiqua. I. Isolation of semi-sterile stocks and their cytogenetic properties. Theoret. Appl. Genet. 44: 111–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zurlini, G. and Robinson, A. S.. 1978. Genetic control of Hylemya antiqua. III. Differences in pupation ability between two strains of Hylemya antiqua. Researches Popul. Ecol. Kyoto Univ. 20: 1–14.Google Scholar