Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T10:35:48.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN FLOWERING PLANTS AND FOUR SPECIES OF BOMBUS (HYMENOPTERA: APIDAE) IN SOUTHERN ONTARIO

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

H. J. Liu ,
R. P. Macfarlane  and
D. H. Pengelly
H. J. Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario
R. P. Macfarlane
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario
D. H. Pengelly
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An attraction to certain plant species by Bombus terricola, B. bimaculatus, B. perplexus, and B. ternarius was observed. The gathering of pollen was observed as a behavioural act distinct from nectar gathering. Pollen analyses indicated that pollen collectors restricted their activities to a small number of plant species. These bees’ life histories and flower preferences made them potentially effective pollinators of early-flowering economic crops, Ribes spp., and Pyrus Malus in particular, and of common weeds such as Solanum Dulcamara and Hypericum perforatum. The same reasons prevented them from being important in the pollination of Trifolium pratense and Medicago sativa.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 107 , Issue 6 , June 1975 , pp. 577 - 588
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, R. J. and Morton, J. K.. 1972. An improved technique for examining pollen under the scanning electron microscope. Pollen et Spores 14: 203–212.Google Scholar
Bailey, L. H. 1949. Manual of cultivated plants most commonly grown in the continental United States and Canada. Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
Bigras-Huot, F., Huot, L., and Jobin, L. J.. 1973. La pollinisation du blueut au Lac St.-Jean II Rôle du Bombus spp., (Deuxième Partie). Ann. soc. ent. Québ. 18: 15–36.Google Scholar
Blackman, M. W. 1918. On the insect visitors to the blossoms of wild blackberry and wild spiraea — a study in seasonable distribution. Tech. Publ. N.Y. St. Coll. For. 10: 117–144.Google Scholar
Bohart, G. E. 1960. Insect pollination of forage legumes. Bee Wld 41: 85–97.Google Scholar
Brian, A. D. 1954. The foraging of bumble bees. Bee Wld 35: 61–67, 81–91.Google Scholar
Brittain, W. H. and Newton, D. E.. 1933. A study in the relative constancy of hive bees and wild bees in pollen gathering. Can. J. Res. 9: 334–349.Google Scholar
Britton, W. E. and Viereck, H. L.. 1906. Insects collected from the flowers of fruit trees and plants. 5th Rep. St. Ent. Conn.: 207–224.Google Scholar
Clifford, P. T. P. 1973. Increasing bumble bee densities in red clover seed production areas. N.Z. Jl exp. Agric. 1: 377–379.Google Scholar
Dorr, J. and Martin, E. C.. 1966. Pollination studies on the highbush blueberry, Vaccinium corymbosum L. Q. Bull. Mich. agric. Stn 48: 437–448.Google Scholar
Edwards-Anderka, C. J. and Pengelly, D. H.. 1970. Pollen analysis in the ecology of bees of the genus Bombus Latr. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in southern Ontario. Proc. ent. Soc. Ont. 100: 170–176.Google Scholar
Erdtman, G. 1969. Handbook of palynology. Morphology, taxonomy, ecology. An introduction to the study of pollen grains and spores. Scandinavian University Books, Munksgard, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Faegri, K. and Iversen, J.. 1964. Textbook of pollen analysis. Blackwell Sci. Publ., Oxford.Google Scholar
Fernald, M. L. 1950. Manual of botany; a handbook of the flowering plants and ferns of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada, by Gray, A.. American Book Co., New York. 8th ed.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. L. 1953. Native pollinators of alfalfa Medicago sativa L. in northern Minnesota. Minn. Beekpr 6: 8–9.Google Scholar
Free, J. B. 1970. Insect pollination of crops. Academic Press, London and New York.Google Scholar
Free, J. B. and Williams, I. H.. 1972. The transport of pollen on the body hairs of honeybees (Apis Mellifera L.) and bumblebees (Bombus spp. L.). J. appl. Ecol. 9: 609–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friden, F., Eskilson, L., and Bingesfors, S.. 1962. Bumble bees and red clover pollination in central Sweden. Proc. I int. Symp. Pollinat. (Copenhagen, 1960) 1: 17–26.Google Scholar
Fye, R. E. and Medler, J. T.. 1954. Spring emergence and floral hosts of Wisconsin bumblebees. Trans. Wis. Acad. Sci. Arts Lett. 43: 75–82.Google Scholar
Guppy, J. C. 1958. Insect surveys of clovers, alfalfa and birdsfoot trefoil in eastern Ontario. Can. Ent. 90: 523–531.Google Scholar
Gurr, L. 1957. Seasonal availability of food and its influence on the abundance of bumble bees in the South Island of New Zealand. N.Z. Jl Sci. Technol. (A) 38: 867–870.Google Scholar
Hobbs, G. A., Nummi, W. O., and Virostek, J. F.. 1961. Food-gathering behaviour of honey, bumble, and leaf-cutter bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) in Alberta. Can. Ent. 93: 409–419.Google Scholar
Holm, S. N. 1966. Problems of the domestication of bumble bees. Proc. II int. Symp. Pollinat. (London, 1964). Bee Wld 47 (Suppl.): 179–186.Google Scholar
House, H. L. 1972. Insect nutrition, pp. 513–573. In T-W-Fiennes, R. N. (Ed.), Biology of nutrition. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hyde, H. A. and Adams, K. F.. 1958. An atlas of airborne pollen grains. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Judd, W. W. 1966. Studies on the Byron Bog in southwestern Ontario. XXVII. Insects associated with flowering blueberry, Vaccinium atrococcum (Gray) Heller. Can. Fld Nat. 80: 242–244.Google Scholar
Judd, W. W. 1973. Insects associated with flowering elacampane (Inula helenium) in the vicinity of Owen Sound, Ontario. Ont. Fld Biol. 27: 25–28.Google Scholar
Lutz, F. E. and Cockerell, T. D. A.. 1920. Notes on the distribution and bibliography of North American bees of the families Apidae, Meliponidae, Bombidae, Euglossidae and Anthophoridae. Bull. Am. Mus. nat. Hist. 42: 491–641.Google Scholar
Macior, L. W. 1964. An experimental study of the floral ecology of Dodecatheon meadia. Am. J. Bot. 51: 96–108.Google Scholar
Macior, L. W. 1968. Bombus (Hymenoptera: Apidae) queen foraging in relation to vernal pollination in Wisconsin. Ecology 49: 20–25.Google Scholar
Macior, L. W. 1971. Co-evolution of plants and animals — systematic insights from plant-insect interactions. Taxon 20: 17–28.Google Scholar
Medler, J. T. 1957. Bumble bee ecology in relation to the pollination of alfalfa and red clover. Insectes soc. 4: 245–252.Google Scholar
Medler, J. T. and Carney, D. W.. 1963. Bumble bees of Wisconsin. Univ. Wis. Res. Bull. 240.Google Scholar
Milliron, H. E. 1971. A monograph of the Western Hemisphere bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombinae). I. The genera Bombus and Megabombus subgenus Bombias. Mem. ent. Soc. Can., No. 82. 80 pp.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T. B. 1962. Bees of the eastern United States. Vol. 2. Tech. Bull. N.C. exp. Stn, No. 152.Google Scholar
Morrison, F. O. 1943. Observations on the number and species of the bumble bees visiting red clover. 73rd A. Rep. ent. Soc. Ont., pp. 16–20.Google Scholar
Morse, R. A. 1958. The pollination of bird's-foot trefoil. Proc. X int. Congr. Ent., Vol. 4, pp. 951–953.Google Scholar
Pankiw, P. and Elliott, C. R.. 1959. Alsike clover pollination by honeybees in the Peace River region. Can. J. Pl. Sci. 39: 505–511.Google Scholar
Peck, O. and Bolton, J. L.. 1946. Alfalfa seed production in northern Saskatchewan as affected by bees, with a report on means of increasing populations of native bees. Scient. Agric. 26: 388–418.Google Scholar
Pengelly, D. H. 1954. Alfalfa pollination in southern Ontario. 84th A. Rep. ent. Soc. Ont., pp. 101–118.Google Scholar
Phipps, C. R. 1930. Blueberry and huckleberry insects. Bull. Maine agric. Exp. Stn, No. 356; pp. 107–232.Google Scholar
Plath, O. E. 1934. Bumble bees and their ways. Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
Richards, K. W. 1973. Biology of Bombus polaris Curtis and B. hyperboreus Schönherr at Lake Hazen, Northwest Territories (Hymenoptera: Bombini). Quaest. ent. 9: 115–157.Google Scholar
Robertson, C. 1929. Flowers and insects: lists of visitors of 453 flowers. Science Press, Lancaster, Pa. (Private printing.)Google Scholar
Standifer, L. N. 1967. A comparison of protein quality of pollens for growth-stimulation of the hypopharyngeal glands and longevity of honey bees Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Insectes soc. 14: 415–426.Google Scholar
Stephen, W. P. 1955. Alfalfa pollination in Manitoba. J. econ. Ent. 48: 543–548.Google Scholar
Todd, F. E. and Bretherick, O.. 1942. The composition of pollens. J. econ. Ent. 35: 312–317.Google Scholar
Webb, M. C. 1961 (unpub.). The biology of the bumble bees of a limited area in eastern Nebraska. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Nebraska.Google Scholar
Wodehouse, R. P. 1935. Pollen grains. Their structure, identification and significance in science and medicine. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Wood, G. 1965. Note on the activity of native pollinators in relation to the bloom periods of low bush blueberry. J. econ. Ent. 58: 777.Google Scholar
Wyatt, B. K. W. 1970 (unpub.). Ecology of bumble bees (Bombus Latr.) in southern Ontario with reference to nest development and pollen sources. M.Sc. Thesis, Univ. of Guelph.Google Scholar