Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T11:03:36.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MICROBIAL NUMBERS AND DROPLET SIZE IN AERIAL SPRAY APPLICATIONS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

O. N. Morris
O. N. Morris
Affiliation:
Chemical Control Research Institute, Environment Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0W3
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments were designed to determine the actual number of spores and crystals of Bacillus thuringiensis (B.t.) and of nuclear polyhedral virus and entomopoxvirus deposited at ground level per unit area and to determine any change in spore:crystal ration following aerial application in forested plots.

The results indicate that: (1) The estimation of B.t. aerial spray deposits by the commonly used agar plate method grossly underestimates the deposit rates of active ingredient. The tracer dye method more accurately estimates deposit rates for both B.t. and entomopathogenic viruses. As a dye 0.1% Erio Acid Red XB is recommended. (2) The relationship between drop size and the number of spores and crystals or virus inclusion bodies/drop is curvilinear. This relationship probably holds true regardless of spray volume rate. All visible spray deposits at ground level contained some active ingredient. (3) With B.t. sprays the sporexrystal ratio emitted from the aircraft is not changed upon target impact.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 109 , Issue 10 , October 1977 , pp. 1319 - 1323
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bullock, H. R. and Dulmage, H. T.. 1969. Bacillus thuringiensis against pink bollworms on cotton in field cages. J. econ. Ent. 62: 994–995.Google Scholar
Falcon, L. A. 1971. Use of bacteria for microbial control, pp. 67–95. In Burgess, H. D. and Hussey, N. W. (Eds.), Microbial control of insects and mites. Acad. Press N.Y.Google Scholar
Haliburton, W., Hopewell, W. W., and Yule, W. N.. 1975. Deposit assessment, chemical insecticides, pp. 59–67. In Prebble, M. L. (Ed.), Aerial control of forest insects. Thorn Press Ltd.Google Scholar
Klein, W. H. and Lewis, F. B.. 1966. Experimental spraying with Bacillus thuringiensis for control of the spruce budworm. J. For. 64: 458–462.Google Scholar
Lewis, F. B. and Connola, D. P.. 1966. Field and laboratory investigations of Bacillus thuringiensis as a control agent for gypsy moth. Res. Pap. U.S. For. Serv. NE-50. 38 pp.Google Scholar
Morris, O. N. 1973. A method of visualizing and assessing deposits of aerially sprayed insect microbes. J. invert. Path. 22: 115–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, O. N. 1976. A 2-year study of the efficacy of Bacillus thuringiensis–chitinase combinations in spruce budworm (Choristoneura fumiferana) control. Can. Ent. 108: 225–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, O. N. and Armstrong, J. A.. 1975. Preliminary field trials with Bacillus thuringiensis – chemical insecticide combinations in the integrated control of the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 107: 1281–1288.Google Scholar
Morris, O. N., Armstrong, J. A., and Hildebrand, M. J.. 1975. Laboratory tests and field trials of low volume aerial applications of Bacillus thuringiensis – Orthene® combinations against spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.). Rep. Chem. Control Res. Inst. CC-X-110. 81 pp.Google Scholar
Smirnoff, W. A., Randall, A. P., Martineau, R., Haliburton, W. W., and Juneau, A.. 1973. Field test of the effectiveness of chitinase additive to Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner against Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.). Can. J. Forest Res. 3: 228–236.Google Scholar
Yamvrias, C. and Angus, T. A.. 1970. The comparative pathogenicity of some Bacillus thuringiensis varieties to larvae of the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana. J. invert. Path. 15: 92–99.Google Scholar