Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T01:17:47.717Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

PROGENY PRODUCTION BY TRICHOGRAMMA MINUTUM (HYMENOPTERA: TRICHOGRAMMATIDAE) UTILIZING EGGS OF CHORISTONEURA FUMIFERANA (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE) AND SITOTROGA CEREALELLA (LEPIDOPTERA: GELECHIIDAE)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Mark W. Houseweart ,
Daniel T. Jennings ,
Celeste Welty  and
Susan G. Southard
Mark W. Houseweart
Affiliation:
Cooperative Forestry Research Unit, College of Forest Resources, University of Maine at Orono 04469
Daniel T. Jennings
Affiliation:
Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Forest Service, University of Maine at Orono 0446
Celeste Welty
Affiliation:
Cooperative Forestry Research Unit, College of Forest Resources, University of Maine at Orono 04469
Susan G. Southard
Affiliation:
Cooperative Forestry Research Unit, College of Forest Resources, University of Maine at Orono 04469
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Mean daily progeny production by Trichogramma minutum (“Maine strain”) was 15.2 in Choristoneura fumiferana and 10.9 in Sitotroga cerealella eggs. Total progeny production was higher in S. cerealella, but not significantly different from that of C. fumiferana eggs. Significantly more eggs were deposited by T. minutum the first day than in subsequent days regardless of host. We found no significant relationship between progeny produced by females and the day of male death as previously reported. Ratio of females:males decreased significantly with increasing age and opposition activity of the mother. The oviposition period spanned 68% of the female's life span when S. cerealella eggs were available; whereas females spent significantly less time (60%) ovipositing in C. fumiferana eggs.

Résumé

La production journalière de progénitures chez Trichogramma minutum (“souche du Maine”) a été de 15.2 sur des oeufs de Choristoneura fumiferana et de 10.9 chez ceux de Sitotroga cerealella. La production totale de progénitures était plus élevée chez S. cerealella mais non significativement différente de celle obtenue avec les oeufs de C. fumiferana. Quel que soit l'hôte, un nombre significativement plus élevé d'oeufs ont été produits par T. minutum le premier jour comparé aux jours subséquents. Aucune relation significative n'a été mise en évidence entre la production de progénitures par les femelles et le jour de la mon des mâles tel que rapporté antérieurement. Le ratio femelles : mâles a diminué significativement avec l'augmentation de l'âge et de l'activité de ponte de la mère. La période de ponte s'est étendue sur 68% de la durée de vie de la femelle lorsque des oeufs de S. cerealella étaient offerts, alors que les femelles ont pondu significativement moins longtemps (60%) dans les oeufs de C. fumiferana.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 115 , Issue 10 , October 1983 , pp. 1245 - 1252
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1983

References

Ashley, T. R., Allen, J. C., and Gonzalez, D.. 1974. Successful parasitization of Heliothis zea and Trichoplusia ni eggs by Trichogramma. Environ. Ent. 3: 319–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashley, T. R. and Gonzalez, D.. 1974. Effect of various food substances on longevity and fecundity of Trichogramma. Environ. Ent. 3: 169–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanders, S. E. 1935. Host influence on the prolificacy and size of Trichogramma. Pan-Pacif. Ent. 11: 175–177.Google Scholar
Flanders, S. E. 1939. Environmental control of sex in hymenopterous insects. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 32: 11–26.Google Scholar
Grisdale, D. 1970. An improved laboratory method for rearing large numbers of spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 102: 1111–1117.Google Scholar
Jennings, D. T. and Houseweart, M. W.. 1978. Sexing spruce budworm pupae. U.S. Forest Serv. Res. NE-255. 2 pp.Google Scholar
Lewis, W. J., Nordlund, D. A., Gross, H. R. Jr., Perkins, W. D., Knipling, E. F., and Voegele, J.. 1976. Production and performance of Trichogramma reared on eggs of Heliothis zea and other hosts. Environ. Ent. 5: 449–452.Google Scholar
Lund, H. O. 1938. Studies on longevity and productivity in Trichogramma evanescens. J. agric. Res. 56: 421–439.Google Scholar
Marston, N. and Ertle, L. R.. 1973. Host influence on the bionomics of Trichogramma minutum. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 66: 1155–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, R. K. 1970. A simple cage for maintaining parasites. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 63: 625–626.Google Scholar
Nagarkatti, S. and Nagaraja, H.. 1978. Experimental comparison of laboratory reared vs. wild-type Trichogramma confusum (Hym: Trichogrammatidae) I. Fertility, fecundity and longevity. Entomophaga 23: 129–136.Google Scholar
Peterson, A. 1930. A biological study of Trichogramma minutum Riley as an egg parasite of the oriental fruit moth. Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. 215. 22 pp.Google Scholar
Salt, G. 1940. Experimental studies in insect parasitism. VII. The effects of different hosts on the parasite Trichogramma evanescens Westw. (Hym: Chalcidoidea). Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 15: 81–95.Google Scholar
Southard, Susan G., Houseweart, M. W., Jennings, D. T., and Halteman, W. A.. 1982. Size differences of laboratory reared and wild populations of Trichogramma minutm (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Can. Ent. 114: 693–698.Google Scholar
Stinner, R. E., Ridgway, R. L., and Morrison, R. K.. 1974. Longevity, fecundity, and searching ability of Trichogramma pretiosum reared by three methods. Environ. Ent. 3: 558–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweetman, H. L. 1958. The Principles of Biological Control: Interrelations of Host and Pests and Utilization in Regulation of Animal and Plant Populations. Wm. C. Brown, DuBuque, Iowa. 560 pp.Google Scholar
Taylor, T. A. and Stern, V. M.. 1971. Host-preference studies with the egg parasite Trichogramma semifumatum (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 64: 1381–1390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, D. S. K. 1981. Utilization of Trichogramma minutum Riley for the biological control of the codling moth in southern Ontario. Master's Thesis, Univ. of Guelph. 88 pp.Google Scholar