Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T10:52:21.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A PROCESS MODEL FOR EASTERN BLACKHEADED BUDWORM (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Peter J. McNamee
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Resource Ecology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C. V6T 1W5

Abstract

A theory for the population behavior of the eastern blackheaded budworm is presented. The qualitative properties and key processes of the system are identified and a description of the theory as a simulation model is given. Two domains of stability exist for the insect; one is caused by bird predation, the second by the effects of food limitation. The model predicts that the budworm’s cyclical population fluctuations are produced by the disappearance and reappearance of these stable domains and consequent movement of densities to new levels. Parasitism is identified as the principal mechanism causing this behavior. A qualitative comparison of model behavior with historical behavior is made and a critical field experiment to test the validity of the theory is proposed. Finally it is suggested that the population behavior of many forest defoliators may be explained using this theory.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berryman, A. A. 1978. Towards a theory of insect epidemiology. Researches Popul. Ecol. Kyoto Univ. 19: 181196.Google Scholar
Balch, R. E. 1932. The black-headed budworm. Spec. Circ. Can. Dep. Agric. Div. For. Ins.Google Scholar
Buckner, C.H. 1958. Mammalian predators of the larch sawfly. Proc. Tenth int. Congr. Ent., Vol. 4, pp. 353361.Google Scholar
Buckner, C.H. 1959. The assessment of larch sawfly cocoon predation by small mammals. Can. Ent. 91: 275282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckner, C. H. and Turnock, W. J.. 1965. Avian predation of the larch sawfly, Pristiphora erichsonii (Htg.) (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae). Ecology 46: 223236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, R. W. 1974. The gypsy moth and its natural enemies. Inf. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. 381. 27 pp.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. W. and Sloan, R. J.. 1977 a. Natural regulation of innocuous gypsy moth populations. Environ. Ent. 6: 315322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, R. W. and Sloan, R. J.. 1977 b. Release of gypsy moth populations from innocuous levels. Environ. Ent. 6: 232330.Google Scholar
Carroll, W. J. 1956. History of the hemlock looper, Lambdina fiscelleria fiscellaria (Guen.) (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) in Newfoundland, and notes on its biology. Can. Ent. 88: 587599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, W. C., Jones, D. D., and Holling, C. S.. Lessons for ecological policy design; a case study of ecosystem management. Ecol. Modell. (in press).Google Scholar
Cox, J. A. 1932. Ascogaster carpocapse Viereck, an important larval parasite of the codling moth and Oriental fruit moth. Tech. Bull. N.Y. St. agric. Exp. Stn 188.Google Scholar
Forest Insect and Disease Survey. Annual Reports. Can. Dep. Agric. 1939–1976.Google Scholar
Gage, C. H., Miller, C. A., and Mook, L. J.. 1970. The feeding response of some forest birds to black-headed budworm. Can. J. Zool. 48: 359366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, K. J., and Holling, C. S.. 1969. A competition sub-model for parasites and predators. Can. Ent. 87: 785818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heron, R. J. 1955. Studies on the starvation of last-instar larvae of the larch sawfly, Pristiphora erichsonii (Htg.) (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae). Can. Ent. 87: 417427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heron, R. J. 1966. The reproductive capacity of the larch sawfly and some factors of concern in its measurement. Can. Ent. 98: 561578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holling, C. S. 1959 a. The components of predation as revealed by a study of small mammal predation of the European pine sawfly. Can. Ent. 91: 293320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holling, C. S. 1959 b. Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can. Ent. 91: 385398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holling, C. S. 1965. The functional response of predators to prey density and its role in mimicry and population regulation. Mem. Ent. Soc. Can. 45. 60 pp.Google Scholar
Holling, C. S. 1966. The functional response of invertebrate predators to prey density. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 48. 86 pp.Google Scholar
Holling, C. S. 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. A. Rev. ecol. Syst. 4: 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holling, C. S. (Ed.). Adaptive environmental assessment and management. Wiley, London. In press.Google Scholar
Ives, W. G. H. 1963. Effects of defoliation on survival of larvae of the larch sawfly Pristiphora erichsonii (Htg.). Can. Ent. 95: 877892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, D. D. 1977. The budworm site model, in Norton, G. A. and Holling, C. S. (Eds.), Proc. Conf. Pest Management. Int. Inst. Appl. Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria. CP-77-6. P 91155.Google Scholar
Lejeune, R. R. 1955. Population ecology of the larch sawfly. Can. Ent. 87: 117123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, R. M. 1977. Thresholds and breakpoints in systems with a multiplicity of stable states. Nature 269: 471477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCambridge, W. F. 1954. Studies of the biology, habits, and control of the black-headed budworm in Alaska. Prog. Rep. Alaska For Res. Center, Juneau, Alaska.Google Scholar
McCambridge, W. F. and Downing, G. L.. 1960. Black-headed budworm. Pest Leafl. U.S. Dep. agric. For Serv. 45.Google Scholar
McLeod, J. M.a. New applications for entomological simulation models. Proc. Northeastern For. Inst. Work Conf. In press.Google Scholar
McLeod, J. M.b. Discontinuous stability in a sawfly life system and its relevance to pest management strategies, in Waters, W. E. (Ed.), Proc. 15th int. Congr. Ent. (1976). In press.Google Scholar
McNamee, P. J. 1977. A literature review of the ecological behavior of seven insect-forest systems and the presentation of a mathematical model of the Acleris variana — balsam fir ecology. B.Sc. Thesis.Google Scholar
Miller, C. A. 1966. The black-headed budworm in eastern Canada. Can. Ent. 98: 592613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, R. F. 1958. A review of the important insects affecting the spruce-fir forest in the Maritime Provinces. For. Chron. 34: 159189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, R. F. 1959. Single-factor analysis in population dynamics. Ecology 40: 580588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, R. F. 1963. The dynamics of epidemic spruce budworm populations. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 31. 332 pp.Google Scholar
Noy-Meir, I. 1975. Stability of grazing systems: an application of predator-prey graphs. J. Ecol. 63: 459481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otvos, I.S. 1973. Biological control agents and their role in the population fluctuations of the eastern hemlock looper in Newfoundland. Nfld. For. Res. Cent. Info. Rep. N-X-102.Google Scholar
Peterman, R. M., Clark, W. C., and Holling, C. S.. The dynamics of resilience: shifting stability domains in fish and insect systems, In Anderson, R. M. and Turner, B. D., Population dynamics. Proc. Symp of British Ecological Society. In press.Google Scholar
Prebble, M. L. 1933. The biology of Podisus serieventris Uhler in Cape Breton, Nova Scotia. Can. J. Res. (D) 9: 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prebble, M. L. 1935. Actia diffidens Curran, a parasite of Peronea variana Fernald in Cape Breton, Nova Scotia. Can. J. Res. (D). 12: 216227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prebble, M. L. Ed. 1975. Aerial control of forest insects in Canada. Environ. Canada.Google Scholar
Ricker, W. E. 1954. Stock and recruitment. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 11: 559623.Google Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E. and Comins, H. M.. 1976. A synoptic population model. J. Anim. Ecol. 45: 949965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takhashi, F. 1964. Reproduction curve with two equilibrium points: consideration on the fluctuation of an insect population. Researches Popul. Ecol. Kyoto Univ. 6: 2836.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. R. 1924. La theorie mathematique de l'action des parasites entomophages et le facteur du hasard. Annls Fac. Sci. Marseille 2: 6989.Google Scholar