Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T10:51:38.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preference of Tomicus piniperda (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) parent adults and shoot-feeding progeny adults for three pine species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Nathan W. Siegert  and
Deborah G. McCullough
Nathan W. Siegert*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology and Department of Forestry, 243 Natural Science Building, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States 48824-1115
Deborah G. McCullough
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology and Department of Forestry, 243 Natural Science Building, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States 48824-1115
*
1 Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed (E-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Host preference of the pine shoot beetle, Tomicus piniperda (L.), was investigated in two laboratory choice test studies using red pine (Pinus resinosa Ait.) (Pinaceae), jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb.), and Scotch pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Host preference of parent adult beetles was evaluated using freshly cut, similarly sized logs in a wind tunnel. Parent beetles colonized Scotch pine logs significantly more often when given a choice of Scotch pine and either red pine or jack pine logs, but did not show a preference when presented with red pine and jack pine logs. Host preference of progeny adults was tested in a laboratory bioassay using current-year pine shoots. Shoot-feeding progeny adults initiated tunnels in jack pine shoots significantly more often than in Scotch pine and red pine shoots, and preferred Scotch pine over red pine shoots. Shoots with diameters of 0.4–0.5 cm were attacked most frequently, regardless of species. Results suggest that the two North American pines are suitable hosts, but T. piniperda may be most likely to colonize Scotch pine, a European species. Efforts to detect or monitor T. piniperda populations in the Great Lakes and northeastern regions should focus on areas with abundant Scotch pine brood material. Progeny that emerge from brood material, however, may be as likely to shoot-feed in jack pine as in Scotch pine.

Résumé

Nous avons étudié le choix des hôtes chez Tomicus piniperda (L.) au cours de tests de choix en laboratoire, en présence de pins rouges (Pinus resinosa Ait.) (Pinaceae), de pins gris (Pinus banksiana Lamb.) et de pins sylvestres (Pinus sylvestris L.). Pour évaluer les préférences des adultes parents, nous avons disposé des troncs de tailles égales dans un tunnel aérodynamique. Les adultes parents colonisent les pins sylvestres significativement plus souvent en présence des trois espèces de pins, mais ne montrent pas de préférence quand ils sont mis en présence de pins rouges et de pins gris. Les préférences des adultes de la progéniture ont été testées en laboratoire sur des pousses de pins de l’année. Ces adultes qui se nourrissent à même les jeunes pousses font des galeries dans les pousses de pin gris significativement plus souvent que dans les pousses du pin rouge ou du pin sylvestre, et ils préfèrent le pin sylvestre au pin rouge. Quelle que soit l’espèce, les pousses de 0,4 à 0,5 cm sont attaquées le plus souvent. Ces résultats indiquent que les deux pins nord-américains sont des hôtes convenables, mais les scolytes T. piniperda peuvent être plus enclins à coloniser le pin sylvestre, une espèce européenne. Pour repérer ou pour suivre les populations de T. piniperda dans la région des Grands Lacs ou dans le nord-est, il faut cibler surtout le endroits où les insectes peuvent trouver des débris de pin sylvestre en abondance pour leur couvée. Cependant, la progéniture issue des couvées dans les débris de pin sylvestre risque de se nourrir autant de pousses de pin gris que de pousses de pin sylvestre.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 133 , Issue 3 , June 2001 , pp. 343 - 353
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amezaga, I. 1996. Monterrey pine (Pinus radiata D. Don) suitability for the pine shoot beetle (Tomicus piniperda L.) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Forest Ecology and Management 86: 73–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amezaga, I. 1997. Forest characteristics affecting the rate of shoot pruning by the pine shoot beetle (Tomicus piniperda L.) in Pinus radiata D. Don and P. sylvestris L. plantations. Forestry 70: 129–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, S.O. 1973. Increment losses after thinning [in Scots pine] caused by Myelophilus piniperda. Sveriges Skogsvardsforbunds Tidskrift 71: 359–79Google Scholar
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS). 1993. Pine shoot beetle. Federal Register 58(91): 28 333 – 35Google Scholar
Bakke, A. 1968. Ecological studies on bark beetles (Col.: Scolytidae) associated with Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) in Norway with particular reference to the influence of temperature. Meddelelser fra Det Norske Skogforsoksvesen 21: 443–602Google Scholar
Butovitsch, V. 1972. Injury caused by feeding of Blastophagus piniperda on Picea abies. Zeitschrift fuer Angewandte Entomologie 72: 194–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, J.A. 1989. Chemical ecology of bark beetles. Experientia (Basel) 45: 271–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, J.A., Lanne, B.S., Löfqvist, J., Schlyter, F., Bergström, G. 1985. Olfactory recognition of host-tree susceptibility by pine shoot beetles. Naturwissenschaften 72: 324–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, J.A., Lanne, B.S., Löfqvist, J. 1989. Host tree unsuitability recognized by pine shoot beetles in flight. Experientia (Basel) 45: 489–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA). 2000. CFIA database. Available at http://www.cfia-acia.agr.ca/english/ppc/science/pps/sit99e.shtm#Pineshoot (accessed on 15 December 2000)Google Scholar
Chararas, C. 1968. The power of adaptation by Blastophagus piniperda (Col., Scolytidae) to various Pinus spp., and its species preferences. Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Seances de l'Academie des Sciences 266: 238–41Google Scholar
Czerwinski, E. 1998. European pine shoot beetle. pp 5–6in End-of-Season Report of the Forest Health Unit, Ministry of Natural Resources. Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario: Ministry of Natural ResourcesGoogle Scholar
Czerwinski, E.J., Scarr, T.A., Howse, G.M. 1999. Ontario pine shoot beetle infestation 1998–1999. p 203in Proceedings of the 1999 Annual Gypsy Moth Review, 1–4 November 1999. Madison, Wisconsin: National Gypsy Moth Management BoardGoogle Scholar
Czokajlo, D. 1998. Semiochemicals for the larger pine shoot beetle (Tomicus piniperda L.) and its clerid predators. PhD thesis, State University of New York, SyracuseGoogle Scholar
Czokajlo, D., Wink, R.A., Warren, J.C., Teale, S.A. 1997. Growth reduction of Scots pine, Pinus sylvestris, caused by the larger pine shoot beetle, Tomicus piniperda (Coleoptera, Scolytidae), in New York State. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 27: 1394–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eidmann, H.H. 1992. Impact of bark beetles on forests and forestry in Sweden. Journal of Applied Entomology 114: 193–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haack, R.A., Kucera, D. 1993. New introduction—common pine shoot beetle, Tomicus piniperda (L.). Pest alert. US Department of Agriculture Forest Service NA–TP–05–93Google Scholar
Haack, R.A., Lawrence, R.K. 1995. Attack densities of Tomicus piniperda and Ips pini (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) on Scotch pine logs in Michigan in relation to felling date. Journal of Entomological Science 30: 18–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haack, R.A., Lawrence, R.K. 1997. Highlights of Forest Service research on Tomicus piniperda: 1992–1996. pp 111–8 in Proceedings of the 1997 Japanese Beetle and Pine Shoot Beetle Regulatory Review, Louisville, Kentucky, 24–26 February 1997. Riverdale: US Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection ServiceGoogle Scholar
Haack, R.A., Lawrence, R.K., McCullough, D.G., Sadof, C.S. 1997. Tomicus piniperda in North America: an integrated response to a new exotic scolytid. pp 62–72in Gregoire, J.C., Liebhold, A.M., Stephen, F.M., Day, K.R., Salom, S.M. (Eds), Proceedings of Integrating Cultural Tactics into the Management of Bark Beetle and Reforestation Pests. US Department of Agriculture Forest Service General Technical Report NE–236Google Scholar
Hanson, H.S. 1940. Observations on the life cycle of the pine shoot beetles. Scottish Forestry Journal 54: 64–79Google Scholar
Kaitera, J., Jalkanen, R. 1994. The history of shoot damage by Tomicus spp. (Col., Scolytidae) in a Pinus sylvestris L. stand damaged by the shoot-disease fungus Gremmeniella abietina (Lagerb.) Morelet. Journal of Applied Entomology 117: 307–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, M., Mokrzycki, T. 1988. A contribution to the knowledge of the occurrence of the pine shoot beetles Tomicus minor and T. piniperda in Scots pine thickets in Niedzwiady forest district. Sylwan 132: 35–9Google Scholar
Lanne, B.S., Schlyter, F., Byers, J.A., Löfqvist, J., Leufvén, A., Bergstrom, G., Van Der Pers, J.N.C., Unelius, R., Baeckström, P., Norin, T. 1987. Differences in attraction to semiochemicals present in sympatric pine shoot beetles, Tomicus minor and T. piniperda. Journal of Chemical Ecology 13: 1045–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, R.K., Haack, R.A. 1995. Susceptibility of selected species of North American pines to shoot feeding by an Old World scolytid: Tomicus piniperda. pp 536–46 in Hain, F.P., Salom, S.M., Ravlin, F.W., Pyane, T.L., Raffa, K. (Eds), Proceedings of a Joint International Union of Forestry Research Organizations Conference for Working Parties S2.07–05 and S2.07–06: Behavior, Population Dynamics and Control of Forest Insects, Maui, Hawaii, 6–11 February 1994. Wooster: Ohio State University PressGoogle Scholar
Legowski, D. 1987. Observations on twig fall in Niedzwiady forest district in 1977–1983. Sylwan 131: 39–47Google Scholar
Lindgren, B.S. 1983. A multiple funnel trap for scolytid beetles (Coleoptera). The Canadian Entomologist 115: 299–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindgren, B.S. 1997. Optimal release rate of the host monoterpene alpha-pinene for trapping the European pine shoot beetle, Tomicus piniperda (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Ontario 128: 109–11Google Scholar
Löyttyniemi, K., Heliövaara, K., Repo, S. 1988. No evidence of a population pheromone in Tomicus piniperda (Coleoptera: Scolytidae): a field experiment. Annales Entomologici Fennici 54: 93–5Google Scholar
Lutyk, P. 1984. Feeding of Tomicus piniperda on shoots of Norway spruce and silver fir. Sylwan 128: 65–8Google Scholar
Långström, B. 1979. Breeding of pine-shoot beetles in pine litter after felling and crown damage on remaining trees. Skogsentomoligiska Rapporter 1: 1–52Google Scholar
Långström, B. 1980 a. Life cycles of the pine shoot beetles with particular reference to their maturation feeding in the shoots of Scots pine. PhD thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, Division of Forest Entomology, Uppsala, SwedenGoogle Scholar
Långström, B. 1980 b. Distribution of pine shoot beetle (Tomicus piniperda, Tomicus minor) attacks within the crown of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris). Studia Forestalia Suecica 154: 1–25Google Scholar
Långström, B. 1983. Life cycles and shoot-feeding of the pine shoot beetles. Studia Forestalia Suecica 163: 1–29Google Scholar
Långström, B., Hellqvist, C. 1985. Pinus contorta as a potential host for Tomicus piniperda L., and T. minor (Hart) (Col., Scolytidae) in Sweden. Zeitschrift fuer Angewandte Entomologie 99: 174–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Långström, B. 1988. Scots pine resistance against Tomicus piniperda as related to tree vitality and attack density. pp 121–33 in Payne, T.L., Saarenmaa, H. (Eds), Integrated control of scolytid bark beetles. Blacksburg, Virginia: College of Agriculture and Life Science, Virginia Polytechnic Insitiute and State UniversityGoogle Scholar
Långström, B. 1990. Spatial distribution of crown damage and growth losses caused by recurrent attacks of pine shoot beetles in pine stands surrounding a pulp mill in southern Sweden. Journal of Applied Entomology 110: 261–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Långström, B. 1991. Shoot damage and growth losses following three years of Tomicus attacks in Scots pine stands close to a timber storage site. Silva Fennica 25: 133–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Långström, B. 1993 a. Induced and spontaneous attacks by pine shoot beetles on young Scots pine trees: tree mortality and beetle performance. Journal of Applied Entomology 115: 25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Långström, B. 1993 b. Scots pine susceptabilty to attack by Tomicus piniperda (L.) as related to pruning date and attack density. Annales des Sciences Forestieres (Paris) 50: 101–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCullough, D.G., Smitley, D.R. 1995. Evaluation of insecticides to reduce maturation feeding by Tomicus piniperda (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in Scotch pine. Journal of Economic Entomology 88: 693–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michigan Agricultural Statistics Service (MASS). 2000. MASS database. Available at http://www.mda.state.mi.us/mass/mi_nurs97/ (accessed on 15 December 2000)Google Scholar
National Animal and Plant Inspection Service (NAPIS). 2000. NAPIS database. Available at http://www.cercis.purdue.edu/napis/pests/psb/mgif/psbcnty.gif (accessed on 15 December 2000)Google Scholar
Nilsson, S. 1974. Increment losses caused by Tomicus piniperda on Scots pine. Institutionen for Skogsteknik Rapporter och Uppsatser 78: 1–64Google Scholar
Nilsson, S. 1976. Rationalization of forest operations gives rise to insect attack and increment losses. Ambio 5: 17–22Google Scholar
Ohmart, C.P. 1980. Insect pests of Pinus radiata plantations: present and possible future problems. Australian Forestry 43: 226–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennacchio, F., Digilio, M.C., Tremblay, E., Tranfaglia, A. 1994. Host recognition and acceptance behaviour in two aphid parasitoid species: Aphidius ervi and Aphidius microlophii (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 84: 57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauscher, M.D. 1983. Conditioning and genetic variation as causes of individual variation in the oviposition behavior of the tortoise beetle, Deloyala guttata. Animal Behavior 31: 743–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadof, C.S., Waltz, R.D., Kellam, C.D. 1994. Differential shoot feeding by adult Tomicus piniperda (Col.: Scolytidae) in mixed stands of native and introduced pines in Indiana. Great Lakes Entomologist 27: 223–8Google Scholar
Salonen, K. 1973. On the life cycle, especially on the reproduction biology of Blastophagus piniperda L. (Col., Scolytidae). Acta Forestalia Fennica 127: 1–70Google Scholar
Sauvard, D., Lieutier, F., Levieux, J. 1987. Spatial distribution and dispersal of Tomicus piniperda L. (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) in the forest of Orleans (France). Annales des Sciences Forestieres (Paris) 44: 417–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarr, T.A., Czerwinski, E.J., Howse, G.M. 1999. Pine shoot beetle damage in Ontario. p 56in Fosbroke, S.L.C., Gottschalk, K.W. (Eds), Proceedings of the US Department of Agriculture Interagency Research Forum on Gypsy Moth and Other Invasive Species, 1999. US Department of Agriculture Forest Service General Technical Report NE–266Google Scholar
Schönherr, J. 1972. Pheromone in the pine bark beetle Myelophilus piniperda (Col., Scolytidae). Zeitschrift fuer Angewandte Entomologie 71: 410–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, L.M. 1988. Attraction of the bark beetle Tomicus piniperda and some other bark- and wood-living beetles to the host volatiles α-pinene and ethanol. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 46: 203–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, L.M., Lindelöw, Å. 1989. Attraction of scolytids and associated beetles by different absolute amounts and proportions of alpha-pinene and ethanol. Journal of Chemical Ecology 15: 807–17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siegert, N.W. 2000. Host preference and potential impact of pine shoot beetle [Tomicus piniperda (L.) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)] in Michigan pine stands. MS thesis, Michigan State University, East LansingGoogle Scholar
Singer, M.C. 1983. Determinants of multiple host use by a phytophagous insect population. Evolution 37: 389–403CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skilling, D.D. 1990. Pinus sylvestris L. pp 489–96 in Burns, R.M., Honkala, B.H. (Eds), Silvics of North America. Volume 1. Conifers. US Department of Agriculture Forest Service Agricultural Handbook 654Google Scholar
Smith, M.A., Cornell, H.V. 1979. Hopkins host-selection in Nasonia vitripennis and its implications for sympatric speciation. Animal Behavior 27: 365–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokal, R.R., Rohlf, F.J. 1995. Biometry. 3rd ed. New York: WH Freeman and CoGoogle Scholar
Vet, L.E.M., Van Opzeeland, K. 1986. Olfactory microhabitat selection in Leptopilina heterotoma (Hymenoptera: Eucoilidae), a parasitoid of Drosophilidae. Netherlands Journal of Zoology 35: 497–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vité, J.P., Volz, H.A., Paiva, M.R., Bakke, A. 1986. Semiochemicals in host selection and colonization of pine trees by the pine shoot beetle Tomicus piniperda. Naturwissenschaften 73: 39–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volz, H.A. 1988. Monoterpenes governing host selection in the bark beetles Hylurgops palliatus and Tomicus piniperda. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 47: 31–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, J.W., Lemmien, W.A., Bright, J.N., Day, M.W., Sajdak, R.L. 1976. Scotch pine varieties for Christmas tree and forest planting in Michigan. Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station Research Report 293Google Scholar
Ye, H. 1991. On the bionomy of Tomicus piniperda (L.) (Col.: Scolytidae) in the Kunming region of China. Journal of Applied Entomology 112: 366–9Google Scholar
Ye, H., Li, L.S. 1994. The distribution of a Tomicus piniperda (L.) population in the crown of Yunnan pine during the shoot feeding period. Acta Entomologica Sinica 37: 311–6Google Scholar
Zar, J.H. 1984. Biostatistical Analysis. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall IncGoogle Scholar
Zumr, V. 1992. Attractiveness of introduced conifers to xylophagous beetles and their acceptance. Journal of Applied Entomology 113: 233–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar