Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T12:13:39.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PREDATION BY WASPS, BIRDS, AND MAMMALS ON HYPHANTRIA CUNEA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

R. F. Morris
Affiliation:
Maritimes Forest Research Centre, Environment Canada, Fredericton, N.B.

Abstract

Predation by birds and social wasps (Vespula spp.) on larval colonies of Hyphantria cunea Drury was studied in both natural and artificial populations, and predation by mammals on overwintering pupae in the ground was studied in artificial populations. The species of predators are listed and some important differences in their habits of attack are described. Per cent predation by birds is directly related to the population density of H. cunea over a range of densities, but inversely related after density exceeds this range. When habitat and weather favor rapid population growth, H. cunea "escapes" from the population range in which predation exerts a regulatory influence.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hasegawa, H. and Itô, Y.. 1967. Biology of Hyphantria cunea Drury in Japan. I. Notes on adult biology with reference to the predation by birds. Appl. Ent. Zool. 2: 100110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holling, C. S. 1959. The components of predation as revealed by a study of small mammal predation of the European pine sawfly. Can. Ent. 91: 293320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holling, C. S. 1965. The functional response of predators to prey density and its role in mimicry and population regulation. Mem. ent. Soc. Can., No. 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itô, Y. and Miyashita, K.. 1968. Biology of Hyphantria cunea Drury in Japan. V. Preliminary life tables and mortality data is urban areas. Researches Popul. Ecol. Kyoto Univ. 10: 177209.Google Scholar
Miller, C. D. F. 1961. Taxonomy and distribution of Nearctic Vespula. Can. Ent. Suppl. 22.Google Scholar
Morris, R. F. 1948. The land mammals of New Brunswick. J. Mammal. 29: 165176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, R. F. 1967. Influence of parental food quality on the survival of Hyphantria cunea. Can. Ent. 99: 2433.Google Scholar
Morris, R. F. 1971 a. Observed and simulated changes in genetic quality in natural populations of Hyphantria cunea. Can. Ent. 103: 893906.Google Scholar
Morris, R. F. 1971 b. The influence of land use and vegetation on the population density of Hyphantria cunea. Can. Ent. 103: 15251536.Google Scholar
Morris, R. F. 1972. Predation by insects and spiders inhabiting colonial webs of Hyphantria cunea. Can. Ent. 104: 11971207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, R. F. and Fulton, W. C.. 1970. Models for the development and survival of Hyphantria cunea in relation to temperature and humidity. Mem. ent. Soc. Can., No. 70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neilson, M. M. and Morris, R. F.. 1964. The regulation of European spruce sawfly numbers in the Maritime Provinces of Canada from 1937 to 1963. Can. Ent. 96: 773784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, R. T. 1947. A field guide to the birds (2nd ed.). Houghton Mifflin, Boston.Google Scholar
Royama, T. 1970. Factors governing the hunting behaviour and selection of food by the great tit (Parus major L.). J. Anim. Ecol. 39: 619668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tothill, J. D. 1922. The natural control of the fall webworm in Canada. Bull. Can. Dep. Agric. (n.s.), No. 3.Google Scholar
Wellington, W. G., Sullivan, C. R., and Henson, W. R.. 1954. The light reactions of the spotless fall webworm. Can. Ent. 86: 529542.Google Scholar