Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T02:00:31.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Population variability of a native and an introduced herbivore of carrots (Apiaceae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2017

Robert J. Lamb*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3T 2N2, Canada
Guy Boivin
Affiliation:
St-Jean-sur-Richelieu Research and Development Center, Agriculture and Agrifood Canada, St-Jean-sur-Richelieu, Québec, J3B 3E6, Canada
*
1Corresponding author (email: [email protected])

Abstract

Long-term, twice weekly, trap catches of the native carrot weevil, Listronotus oregonensis (LeConte) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), and the introduced carrot rust fly, Psila rosae (Fabricius) (Diptera: Psilidae), were used to test the hypothesis that native populations fluctuate less from year-to-year than those of introduced species, because the native species has had more time to adapt to temporal variability in its habitat than an introduced species. Variability in annual abundance was estimated for 33 years, and for 11-year or 16–17-year subsets of the 33-year time series. Temporal population variability was quantified as PV, a proportion between 0 and 1. The native carrot weevil had a PV of 0.39, less than that of the introduced carrot rust fly with a PV of 0.67, supporting the hypothesis. Generation 1 for both species showed a decline in PV over three decades consistent with the hypothesis that adaptation to variability in the habitat leads to lower PV. Over 33 years, the carrot weevil developed a second generation with a PV of 0.70, higher than that of the first generation, which is consistent with the hypothesis that adaptation is required to stabilise population dynamics in a new habitat, in this case a new temporally defined habitat.

Type
Behaviour & Ecology
Copyright
© Entomological Society of Canada 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Subject editor: Rob Johns

References

Boivin, G. 1985. Evaluation of monitoring techniques for the carrot weevil, Listronotus oregonensis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). The Canadian Entomologist, 117: 927933.Google Scholar
Boivin, G. 1987. Seasonal occurrence and geographical distribution of the carrot rust fly (Diptera: Psilidae) in Québec. Environmental Entomology, 16: 503506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boivin, G. 1999. Integrated management for carrot weevil. Integrated Pest Management Reviews, 4: 2137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappuccino, N. 1987. Comparative population dynamics of two goldenrod aphids: spatial patterns and temporal constancy. Ecology, 68: 16341646.Google Scholar
Dalin, P., Kindvall, O., and Björkman, C. 2009. Reduced population control of an insect pest in managed willow monocultures. Public Library of Science One, 4: e5847. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005487.Google Scholar
Degen, T., Stadler, E., and Ellis, P.R. 1999. Host-plant susceptibility to the carrot fly, Psila rosae. 3. The role of oviposition preferences and larval performance. Annals of Applied Biology, 134: 2734.Google Scholar
Galloway, T.D. and Lamb, R.J. 2014. Abundance and stability are species traits for four chewing lice (Phthiraptera: Menoponidae, Philopteridae) on feral pigeons, Columba livia (Aves: Columbiformes: Columbidae). The Canadian Entomologist, 146: 444456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galloway, T.D. and Lamb, R.J. 2015. Abundance and stability of populations of a chewing louse, Mulcticola macrocephalus (Kellogg) (Phthiraptera: Philopteridae), on common nighthawks, Chordeiles minor (Forster) (Aves: Caprimulgiformes: Caprimulgidae) in Manitoba, Canada. The Canadian Entomologist, 147: 723731.Google Scholar
Heath, J.P. 2006. Quantifying temporal variability in population abundances. Oikos, 115: 573581.Google Scholar
Lamb, R.J. and MacKay, P.A. 2010. Stability of natural populations of an aphid, Uroleucon rudbeckiae, at three spatial scales. The Canadian Entomologist, 142: 3651.Google Scholar
Lamb, R.J., MacKay, P.A., and Alyokhin, A. 2011. Population variability and persistence of three aphid pests of potatoes over 60 years. The Canadian Entomologist, 143: 91101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, R.J., MacKay, P.A., and Alyokhin, A. 2013. Seasonal dynamics of three aphid species: implications for estimating population variability. The Canadian Entomologist, 145: 283291.Google Scholar
Lamb, R.J., MacKay, P.A., and Alyokhin, A. 2017. Estimating population variability of aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae): how many years are required? The Canadian Entomologist, 149: 4855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, R.J., MacKay, P.A., and Wool, D. 2012. Population stability of a tree-galling aphid, Baizongia pistaciae, at three spatial scales. The Canadian Entomologist, 144: 406418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalf, R.L. 1999. Arthropods as pests of plants: an overview. In Handbook of pest management. Edited by J.R. Ruberson. CRC Press, New York, New York, United States of America. Pp. 377394.Google Scholar
Redfearn, A. and Pimm, S.L. 1988. Population variability and polyphagy in herbivorous insect communities. Ecological Monographs, 58: 3955. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942633.Google Scholar
Simonet, D.E. 1981. Carrot weevil management in Ohio vegetables. Ohio Report, 66: 8385.Google Scholar
Stevenson, A.B. 1976. A disposable adhesive trap for monitoring the carrot rust fly. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Ontario, 107: 6569.Google Scholar
Stevenson, A.B. and Boivin, G. 1990. Interaction of temperature and photoperiod in control of reproductive diapause in the carrot weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Environmental Entomology, 19: 836841.Google Scholar
SYSTAT Software. 2009. SYSYAT 13, statistics I. SYSTAT Software, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.Google Scholar
Whitcomb, W.D. 1965. The carrot weevil in Massachusetts. Biology and control. University of Massachusetts Agricultural Experimental Station Bulletin, 550: 130.Google Scholar