Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:45:51.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

PHYSIOLOGICAL CONDITION OF FACE FLIES, MUSCA AUTUMNALIS, CAPTURED FROM CATTLE DURING THE FALL MONTHS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Edward T. Schmidtmann  and
Robert E. Redfern
Edward T. Schmidtmann
Affiliation:
Livestock Insects Laboratory, AEQI, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, Maryland 20705
Robert E. Redfern
Affiliation:
Livestock Insects Laboratory, AEQI, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, Maryland 20705
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The face fly, Musca autumnalis De Geer, overwinters in an imaginal diapause characterized by cessation of reproductive activity and hypertrophy of the fat body (Stoffolano and Matthysse 1967). As in species of mosquitoes that employ a similar overwintering strategy (see Washino 1977), the potential of the face fly to serve as a vector of animal disease agents would be enhanced if flies contact animals prior to hibernation, thus possibly acquiring pathogens that overwinter in the insects. Because little is known about the prehibernation behavior of the face fly, a vector of several parasites of cattle (Branch and Stoffolano 1974; Bech-Neilsen et al. 1982), we here report observations of the physiological condition of face flies captured from cattle during the fall months.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 117 , Issue 2 , February 1985 , pp. 255 - 256
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beck-Neilsen, S., Bornstein, S., Christensson, D., Wallgren, T.B., Zakrisson, G. and Chirico, J.. 1982. Parafilaria bovicola (Tubangui 1934) in cattle: epizootiology-vector studies and experimental transmission of Parafilaria bovicola to cattle. Am. J. Vet. Res. 43: 948–954.Google Scholar
Branch, G.G. and Stoffolano, J.G. Jr., 1974. Face fly; invertebrate vector and host of a mammalian eyeworm in Massachusetts. J. econ. Ent. 67: 304–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glass, H.W. Jr.,, Gerhardt, R.R. and Green, W.H.. 1982. Survival of Moraxella bovis in the alimentary tract of the face fly. J. econ. Ent. 75: 545–546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, R.D. 1984. Relationship of the face fly (Diptera: Muscidae) to pinkeye in cattle: a review and synthesis of the relevant literature. J. med. Ent. 21: 361–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lundquist, H. 1983. Parafilaria bovicola (Tubangui 1984) established in Swedish cattle. Nord. Vet.-Med. 35: 57–68.Google Scholar
Miller, J.A., Oehler, D.D. and Kunz, S.E.. 1984. The release of pyrethroids from insecticide ear tags. J. econ. Ent. 77: 1335–1340.Google Scholar
Mitchell, C.J. 1983. Differentiation of host-seeking behavior from blood-feeding behayior in overwintering Culex pipiens (Diptera:Culicidae) and observations on gonotrophic dissociation. J. med. Ent. 20: 157–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moolenbeek, W.J. and Surgeoner, G.A.. 1980. Southen Ontario survey of eyeworms, Thelazia gulosa and Thelazia lacrymalis in cattle and larvae of Thelazia spp. in the face fly, Musca autumnalis. Can. Vet. J. 21: 50–52.Google Scholar
Staples, B.E., Kotta, P. and Smith, D.W.. 1981. Pursuing a practical solution to bovine pinkeye. Vet. Med. Small Anim. Clin. 76: 1783–1786.Google ScholarPubMed
Steve, P.C. and Lilly, J.H.. 1965. Investigation on transmissibility of Moraxella bovis in cattle by the face fly. J. econ. Ent. 58: 444–446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoffolano, J.G. Jr., and Matthysse, J.G.. 1967. Influence of photoperiod and temperature on diapause in the face fly, Musca autumnalis (Diptera:Muscidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 60: 1242–1246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Washino, R.K. 1977. The physiological ecology of gonotrophic dissociation and related phenomena in mosquitoes. J. med. Ent. 13: 381–388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed