Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T01:19:24.212Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phylogeny of genus Wyeomyia (Diptera: Culicidae) inferred from morphological and allozyme data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

Monique Albuquerque Motta ,
Ricardo Lourenço-de-Oliveira  and
Maria Anice Mureb Sallum
Monique Albuquerque Motta*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Entomologia, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Avenida Brasil 4365, C.E.P. 21045-900, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Ricardo Lourenço-de-Oliveira
Affiliation:
Departamento de Entomologia, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Avenida Brasil 4365, C.E.P. 21045-900, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Maria Anice Mureb Sallum
Affiliation:
Departamento de Epidemiologia, Faculdade de Saúde Pública, Universidade de São Paulo, Avenida Dr. Arnaldo 715, C.E.P. 01246-904, São Paulo, Brazil
*
1 Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Phylogenetic relationships within the genus Wyeomyia Theobald are presented, based on a cladistic analysis of 88 morphological characters (from adults, larvae, and pupae) of 38 named species and 1 unnamed species and 46 allozyme markers from a subset of 19 of these species. Two taxa are used as outgroup (Sabethes aurescens Lutz and Limatus durhami Theobald). The analysis indicates that, as currently defined, the genus Wyeomyia is not a monophyletic lineage: firstly, the genus Onirion Peyton and Harbach is nested within the genus Wyeomyia, and secondly, the subgenus Phoniomyia Theobald is a monophyletic lineage outside the genus Wyeomyia. Our results also demonstrate that the subgenera Cruzmyia Lane and Cerqueira, Decamyia Dyar, Dendromyia Theobald, Spilonympha Motta and Lourenço-de-Oliveira, and Prosopolepis Lutz are monophyletic lineages nested within the genus Wyeomyia. Triamyia Dyar is resurrected as a subgenus of Wyeomyia to include W. aporonoma Dyar and Knab and W. staminifera Lourenço-de-Oliveira, Motta, and Castro. The subgenus Miamyia Dyar is resurrected to include seven species: W. codiocampa Dyar and Knab, W. lutzi (Costa Lima), W. limai Lane and Cerqueira, W. serrata (Lutz), W. hosautos Dyar and Knab, W. oblita (Lutz), and W. sabethea Lane and Cerqueira.

Résumé

Nous présentons les relations phylogénétiques au sein du genre Wyeomyia Theobald d'après une analyse cladistique de 88 caractères morphologiques (des adultes, des larves et des nymphes) chez 38 espèces nominales et une espèce inédite, ainsi que de 46 marqueurs allozymes chez un sous-ensemble de 19 de ces espèces. Deux taxons (Sabethes aurescens Lutz et Limatus durhami Theobald) servent de groupes externes. L'analyse indique que, dans sa définition courante, le genre Wyeomyia ne forme pas une lignée monophylétique: (a) le genre Onirion Peyton et Harbach s'emboîte dans le genre Wyeomyia et (b) le sous-genre Phoniomyia Theobald est une lignée monophylétique qui se situe hors du genre Wyeomyia. Nos résultats démontrent aussi que les sous-genres Cruzmyia Lane et Cerqueira, Decamyia Dyar, Dendromyia Theobald, Spilonympha Motta et Lourenço-de-Oliveira et Prosopolepis Lutz sont des lignées monophylétiques au sein du genre Wyeomyia. Nous tirons de la synonymie le nom de Triamyia Dyar pour servir de sous-genre de Wyeomyia et regrouper W. aporonoma Dyar et Knab et W. staminifera Lourenço-de-Oliveira, Motta et Castro, ainsi que le nom du sous-genre Miamyia Dyar pour inclure 7 espèces: W. codiocampa Dyar et Knab, W. lutzi (Costa Lima), W. limai Lane et Cerqueira, W. serrata (Lutz), W. hosautos Dyar et Knab, W. oblita (Lutz) et W. sabethea Lane et Cerqueira.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 139 , Issue 5 , October 2007 , pp. 591 - 627
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Belkin, J.N., Heinemann, S.J., and Page, W.A. 1970. Mosquito studies (Diptera, Culicidae). XXI. The Culicidae of Jamaica. Contributions of the American Entomological Institute (Ann Arbor), 6: 1–458.Google Scholar
Bonne-Wepster, J., and Bonne, C. 1921. Notes on South American mosquitoes in the British Museum. Insecutor Inscitiae Menstruus, 9: 1–26.Google Scholar
Bremer, K. 1994. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics, 10: 295–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, J.M. 1994. Successive weighting, reability and evidence. Cladistics, 10: 215–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyar, H.G. 1919. A revision of the American Sabethini of the Sabethes group by the male genitalia. Insecutor Inscitiae Menstruus, 7: 114–142.Google Scholar
Dyar, H.G. 1924. Phoniomyia and Dendromyia Theobald (Diptera, Culicidae). Insecutor Inscitiae Menstruus, 12: 107–113.Google Scholar
Dyar, H.G. 1928. The mosquitoes of the Americas. Part I. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Dyar, H.G., and Knab, F. 1906. The larvae of Culicidae classified as independent organisms. Journal of the New York Entomological Society, 14: 169–230.Google Scholar
Dyar, H.G., and Shannon, R.C. 1924. Entomology: the subfamilies, tribes, and genera of American Culicidae. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 14: 472–486.Google Scholar
Edwards, F.W. 1932. Diptera fam. Culicidae. In Genera Insectorum. Vol. 94. Edited by Wytsman, P.. P. Wytsman Press, Desmet-Verteneuil, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
Farris, J.S. 1969. A successive approximations approach to character weighting. Systematic Zoology, 18: 374–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farris, J.P. 1989. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics, 5: 417–419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution, 39: 783–791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harbach, R.E. 1991. A new subgenus of the genus Sabethes (Diptera: Culicidae). Mosquito Systematics, 23: 1–9.Google Scholar
Harbach, R.E., and Kitching, I.J. 1998. Phylogeny and classification of the Culicidae (Diptera). Systematic Entomology, 23: 327–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbach, R.E., and Knight, K.L. 1980. Taxonomist's glossary of mosquito anatomy. Plexus Press, Marlton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Harbach, R.E., and Peyton, E.L. 1990 a. A new subgenus in Wyeomyia (Diptera: Culicidae), with the reclassification and redescription of the type species, Sabethes fernandezyepezi. Mosquito Systematics, 22: 15–23.Google Scholar
Harbach, R.E., and Peyton, E.L. 1990 b. Transfer of the subgenus Davismyia from Wyeomyia to Sabethes and description of the type species, Miamyia petrocchiae (Diptera: Culicidae). Mosquito Systematics, 22: 149–159.Google Scholar
Harbach, R.E., and Peyton, E.L. 1992. A new subgenus of Wyeomyia (Diptera: Culicidae), with the reclassification and redescription of Wyeomyia (Davismyia) arborea, Wyeomyia (Dendromyia) tarsata and Sabethes (Sabethes) carrilloi. Mosquito Systematics, 23: 92–109.Google Scholar
Harbach, R.E., and Peyton, E.L. 2000. Systematics of Oniriun, a new genus of Sabethini (Diptera: Culicidae) from the Neotropical region. Bulletin of the Natural History Museum (Entomology), 69: 115–169.Google Scholar
Hervé, J.P., Dégallier, N., Travassos da Rosa, A.P.A., Pinheiro, F.P., and Sá Filho, G.C. 1986. Arboviroses — aspectos ecológicos. In Instituto Evandro Chagas — 50 anos de contribuição às ciências biológicas e à medicina tropical. Fundação Serviço de Saúde Pública, Belém, Brazil. pp. 409–437.Google Scholar
Hjerten, S. 1961. Agarose as an anticonventional agent in zone eletrophoresis. Biochemical Biophysical Acta, 53: 514–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Y.M. 2002. A pictorial key to the mosquito genera of the world, including subgenera of Aedes and Ochlerotatus (Diptera: Culicidae). Insecta Koreana. Vol. 19. Center for Insect Systematics, Seoul, Korea.Google Scholar
Judd, D.D. 1995. Evolution and classification of the Sabethini (Diptera: Culicidae). Ph.D. dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.Google Scholar
Judd, D.D. 1996. Review of the systematics and phylogenetic relationships of the Sabethini (Diptera: Culicidae). Systematic Entomology, 21: 129–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judd, D.D. 1998 a. Review of a bromeliad-ovipositing lineage in Wyeomyia and the resurrection of Hystatomyia (Diptera: Culicidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 91: 572–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judd, D.D. 1998 b. Exploring component stability using life-stage concordance in Sabethini (Diptera: Culicidae). Cladistics, 14: 63–93.Google Scholar
Knight, K.L., and Stone, A. 1977. A catalog of the mosquitoes of the world (Diptera, Culicidae). Thomas Say Fondation, Entomological Society of America Press, Lanham, Maryland.Google Scholar
Lane, J. 1953. Neotropical Culicidae. University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.Google Scholar
Lane, J., and Cerqueira, N.L. 1942. Os Sabetíneos da América (Diptera, Culicidae). Arquivos de Zoologia (São Paulo), 3: 473–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lourenço-de-Oliveira, R., Motta, M.A., and Castro, M.G. 1992. Wyeomyia staminifera, a new species of mosquito from Brazil (Diptera: Culicidae). Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 87: 115–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lourenço-de-Oliveira, R., Harbach, R.E., Castro, M.G., Motta, M.A., and Peyton, E.L. 1999. Wyeomyia (Prosopolepis) confusa (Lutz): subgeneric validation, species description, and recognition of Wyeomyia flui (and Bonne) as the senior synonym of Wyeomyia kerri Del Ponte and Cerqueira. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, 15: 200–212.Google Scholar
Lutz, A. 1905. Novas especies de mosquitos do Brasil. Imprensa Médica, 13: 347–350.Google Scholar
Maddison, W.P., and Maddison, D.R. 2002. MacClade 4: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Maryland.Google Scholar
Motta, M.A., and Lourenco-de-Oliveira, R. 1995. Wyeomyia luteoventralis Theobald, the type species of the subgenus Dendromyia Theobald (Diptera: Culicidae). Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 90: 375–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motta, M.A., and Lourenço-de-Oliveira, R. 2000. The subgenus Dendromyia Theobald: a review with redescriptions of four species (Diptera: Culicidae). Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 95: 649–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motta, M.A., and Lourenço-de-Oliveira, R. 2005. Spilonympha, a new subgenus of Wyeomyia (Diptera: Culicidae) and description of a new species Wy. aningae. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 98: 838–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motta, M.A., Lourenço-de-Oliveira, R., Monteiro, F.A., and Barros, L.R. 1998. Preliminary evaluation of genetic relatedness of three species of the subgenus Dendromyia Theobald and other species of the genus Wyeomyia Theobald (Diptera: Culicidae). Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 93: 189–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nei, M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics, 89: 583–590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosa-Freitas, M.G., Deane, L.M., and Momen, H. 1990. A morphological, isoenzymatic and behavioural study of ten populations of Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) albitarsis Lynch-Arribálzaga, 1978 (Diptera; Culicidae) including from the type-locality-Baradero, Argentina. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 85: 275–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salles, C.A., Silva, A.R., and Momen, H. 1986. Enzyme typing and phenetic relationships in Vibrio cholerae. Revista Brasileira de Genética, 9: 407–419.Google Scholar
Sallum, M.A.M., Schultz, T.R., and Wilkerson, R.C. 2000. Phylogeny of Anophelinae (Diptera Culicidae) based on morphological characters. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 93: 746–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sneath, P.A., and Sokal, R.R. 1973. Numerical taxonomy. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
Swofford, D.L. 2002. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Maryland.Google Scholar
Swofford, D.L., and Selander, R.B. 1981. BIOSYS-1: a FORTRAN program for the comprehensive analisys of eletrophoretic data in population genetics and systematics. Journal of Heredity, 72: 281–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theobald, F.V. 1901. A monograph of the Culicidae or mosquitoes. London.Google Scholar
Theobald, F.V. 1903. A monograph of the Culicidae or mosquitoes. Vol. 3. British Museum (Natural History), London.Google Scholar
Thorpe, J.P. 1982. The molecular clock hypotesis: biochemical evolution, genetic differentiation and systematics. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 13: 139–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, J.P., and Solé-Cava, A.M. 1994. The use of allozyme eletrophoresis in invertebarate systematics. Zoologica Scripta, 23: 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasconcelos, P.F.C., Travassos da Rosa, A.P.A., Rodrigues, S.G., Travassos da Rosa, E.S., and Dégallier, N. 2001. Travassos da Rosa: inadequate management of natural ecosystem in the Brazilian Amazon region results in the emergence and reemergence of arboviroses. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 17: 155–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar