Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:12:00.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

PHEROMONE TRAPS FOR MONITORING MOTH (LEPIDOPTERA) ABUNDANCES: EVALUATION OF CONE-ORIFICE AND OMNI-DIRECTIONAL DESIGNS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

D. L. Struble
D. L. Struble
Affiliation:
Research Station, Agriculture Canada, Lethbridge, Alberta TlJ 4B1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Directional cone-orifice traps were suitable for monitoring population densities of five Lepidoptera species, provided the captured moths were removed from the traps on a regular basis of at least once a week throughout the flight period. Omni-directional traps with circular screen barriers in the entrance area and a slow-release insecticide in the receiver to kill the captured moths functioned well over extended periods of unattended use. These traps would be useful for monitoring and mass trapping purposes. Similar traps without the circular screen barriers were less efficient but, due to their simplicity, they would also be suitable for monitoring purposes. The optimum quantity of pheromone per dispenser was the same for the directional cone-orifice and omni-directional traps.

Résumé

Des pièges coniques directionnels se prêtent à l'étude des densités de population de 5 espèces de Lépidoptères pourvu que les papillons capturés soient retirés des pièges régulièrement au moins une fois par semaine pendant toute la période de vol. Des pièges omnidirectionnels munis de barrières grillagées à l'entrée et d'un insecticide à libération lente dans le réceptacle pour tuer les papillons capturés fonctionnent bien et longtemps sans entretien. Ces pièges seraient utiles à des fins de surveillance et de piégeage massif. Des dispositifs analogues, mais sans les barrières, sont moins efficaces mais, en raison de leur simplicité, conviendraient également à des fins d'étude et de surveillance. La quantité optimale de phéromone par distributeur est la même pour les deux types de piège.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 115 , Issue 1 , January 1983 , pp. 59 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Houseweart, M. W., Jennings, D. T., and Sanders, C. J.. 1981. Variables associated with pheromone traps for monitoring spruce budworm populations (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 113: 527–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNally, P. S. and Barnes, M. M., 1980. Inherent characteristics of codling moth pheromone traps. Environ. Ent. 9: 538–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minks, A. K. 1977. Trapping with behavior-modifying chemicals: Feasibility and limitations. pp. 385–394in Shorey, H. H. and McKelvey, J. J. Jr., (Eds.), Chemical Control of Insect Behavior, Theory and Application. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Sharp, J. L. and James, J.. 1978. Influences of the age of the trap and pheromone on capturing males of the lesser peachtree borer in sticky traps Environ. Ent. 7: 817–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, R. M. 1981. Pheromones: Background and potential for use in insect pest control. Science 213: 1326–1332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Starratt, A. N. and McLeod, D. G. R.. 1976. Influences of pheromone trap age on capture of the European corn borer. Environ. Ent. 5: 1008–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steck, W. and Bailey, B. K.. 1978. Pheromone traps for moths: Evaluation of cone trap designs and design parameters. Environ. Ent. 7: 449–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H.. 1960. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill. New York. 481 pp.Google Scholar
Struble, D. L. 1981 a. A four-component pheromone blend for optimum attraction of redbacked cutworm males, Euxoa ochrogaster (Guenée). J. chem. Ecol. 7: 615–625.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Struble, D. L. 1981 b. Modification of the attractant blend for adult males of the army cutworm, Euxoa auxiliaris (Grote), and the development of an alternate 3-component attractant blend for this species. Environ. Ent. 10: 167–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Struble, D. L. and Swailes, G. E.. 1975. A sex attractant for the clover cutworm, Scotogramma trifolii (Rottenberg), a mixture of Z-11-hexadecen-1-ol acetate and Z-11-hexadecen-1-ol. Environ. Ent. 4: 632–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Struble, D. L., Swailes, G. E., Steck, W. F., Underhill, E. W., and Chisholm, M. D.. 1976. A sex attractant for the adult males of variegated cutworm, Peridroma saucia. Environ. Ent. 5: 988–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Struble, D. L., Swailes, G. E., Steck, W. F., Underhill, E. W., and Chisholm, M. D.. 1977. A sex attractant for Leucania commoides: A mixture of Z-9-tetradecen-1-yl acetate, Z-11-hexadecen-1-yl acetate, and Z-11-hexadecen-1-ol. Can. Ent. 109: 1393–1398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swailes, G. E., Struble, D. L., and Holmes, N. D.. 1975. Use of traps baited with virgin females for field observations on the bertha armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Can. Ent. 107: 781–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underhill, E. W., Steck, W. F., and Chisholm, M. D.. 1977. A sex pheromone mixture for the bertha army worm moth, Mamestra configurata: (Z)-9-tetradecen-1-ol acetate and (Z)-11-hexadecen-1-ol acetate. Can. Ent. 109: 1335–1340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar