Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:25:43.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Parthenogenesis in the Mealybug, Phenacoccus solani Ferris

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

D. C. Lloyd
D. C. Lloyd
Affiliation:
Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Reproduction in the Pseudococcidae is usually regarded as being predominantly, if not exclusively, bisexual, though Ferris (1950) has pointed out that within the family as defined by him males are known for only a small percentage of the species described to date. Detailed biological observations have been restricted to those members of considerable economic importance and in regard to reproductive habits there are few specific references in the literature. Hough (1922) in his account of the life history of the clover root mealybug Chnaurococcus trifolli (Forbes) Ferris, stated that no males were seen throughout the period of the observations. James (1937) made a comprehensive study of the reproduction of Planococcus citri (Risso) Ferris, Pseudococcus maritimus (Ehrh) Ferris, P. gahani Green, P. adonidum (Linn.) Ferris, and Trionymus peregrinus Green, and found that parthenogenesis did not occur in any of these species. This confirmed conclusions of earlier workers with Pl. citri (Schrader 1923, Sutherland 1932), and with P. gahani and Phenacoccus gossypii Twns & Ckll. (Basinger 1934). However, Myers (1932) reported parthenogenesis in some of his experiments with Pl. citri but his procedure of isolating females from the cultures after the second moult is clearly open to criticism.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 84 , Issue 10 , October 1952 , pp. 308 - 310
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Basinger, A. J.Reproduction in mealybugs. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 27, pp. 17–20, 1934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodenheimer, F. S.Citrus Entomology in the Middle East. The Hague, 1951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, G. F.Atlas of Scale Insects of North America, Series 5, Pt. 1. (Pseudococcidae) Stanford, 1950.Google Scholar
Flanders, S. E.Biological Control of the Potato Mealybug, J. Econ. Ent. 37, p. 312, 1944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, H. E.Sex Ratios and the Status of the Males in Pseudococcinae (Hem. Coccidae) Bull. Em. Res. 28, pp. 429–61, 1937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hough, W. S.Observations on two mealybugs, Trionymus trifolii Forbes, and Pseudococcus maritimus Ehrh. (Horn. Coccidae) Ent. News 33, pp. 171–76, 1922.Google Scholar
Myers, L. E.Two Economic Greenhouse Mealybugs of Mississippi. J. Econ. Ent. 25, pp. 891–96, 1932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrader, F.The Sex Ratio and Oogenesis of Pseudococcus citri Risso. Zeit. indkt. Absta-mungslehre 30, pp. 163–82, 1923.Google Scholar
Strickland, A. H.The Entomology of Swollen Shoot of Cacao. 1. The insect species involved, with notes on their biology. Bull. Ent. Res. 41, pp. 725–48, 1951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, J. R. G.Some Observations on the Common Mealybug Pseudococcus citri Risso. 23rd-24th Ann. Rep. Quebec Soc. Prot. Pl. pp. 105–118, 1932.Google Scholar