Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:34:51.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Orius insidiosus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) in the lower Fraser Valley, British Columbia, Canada1, 2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

David R. Gillespie  and
D.M.J. Quiring
David R. Gillespie*
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre, Agassiz, British Columbia, Canada V0M 1A0
D.M.J. Quiring
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre, Agassiz, British Columbia, Canada V0M 1A0
*
3 Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Populations of Orius spp. were surveyed in the lower Fraser Valley, British Columbia, to determine whether O. insidiosus Say, a non-indigenous species, had established in the region as a result of being released inside greenhouses for biological control of pests. Field collections over 8 years revealed a low incidence of O. insidiosus (10 specimens, <1% of total Orius spp. collected). Numbers in collections did not increase, and collection localities did not become more widespread over the 8 years of survey. Competitive exclusion and temperature and diapause thresholds are discussed as possible mechanisms limiting the establishment of this otherwise widespread North American species.

Résumé

Nous avons inventorié les populations d'Orius spp. dans la vallée inférieure du Fraser, Colombie-Britannique, afin de déterminer si O. insidiosus Say, une espèce non indigène, s'est établie dans la région depuis sa libération dans les serres pour la lutte biologique contre les ravageurs. Les récoltes sur le terrain pendant 8 ans indiquent une incidence faible (10 spécimens, <1 % des récoltes totales). Durant les 8 années de l'inventaire, le nombre de spécimens dans les collections entomologiques n'a pas augmenté et il n'y a pas eu de répartition élargie des sites de récolte. L'exclusion par compétition et les seuils de température et d'humidité sont considérés comme des mécanismes possibles qui ont restreint l'établissement de cette espèce, par ailleurs bien répandue en Amérique du Nord.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 138 , Special Issue/Numéro spécial 4: Honouring Geoffrey G. E. Scudder/En hommage à Geoffrey G.E. Scudder , August 2006 , pp. 590 - 593
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Contribution No. 710 from the Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre, Agassiz, British Columbia, Canada.

2

This paper is part of a special issue honouring Geoffrey G.E. Scudder for his significant contributions to entomology in Canada.

References

Baker, R.H.A., Sansford, C.E., Jarvis, C.H., Cannon, R.J.C., MacLeod, A., and Walters, K.F.A. 2000. The role of climatic mapping in predicting the potential geographical distribution of non-indigenous pests under current and future climates. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 82: 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Environment Canada. 2004. Canadian climate normals or averages 1971–2000 [online]. Available from http://www.climate.weatheroffice.ec.gc.ca/climate_normals/index_e.html [accessed 15 April 2004].Google Scholar
Gillespie, D., and Quiring, D.M.J. 1993. Extending seasonal limits on biological control. International Organization for Biological Control, West Palearctic Regional Section Bulletin, 16(2): 43–45.Google Scholar
Hart, A., Tullett, A., Bale, J., and Walters, K. 2002. Effects of temperature on the establishment potential in the U.K. of the non-native glasshouse biocontrol agent Macrolophus caliginosus. Physiological Entomology, 27: 112–123.Google Scholar
Hatherly, I.S., Bale, J.S., Walters, K.F.A., and Worland, M.R. 2004. Thermal biology of Typholodromips montdoriensis: implications for its introduction as a glasshouse biological control agent in the UK. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 111: 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, T.J. 1998. Family Anthocoridae Fieber, 1837. The minute pirate bugs. In Catalogue of the Heteroptera, or true bugs, of Canada and the continental United States. Edited by Henry, T.J. and Froeschner, R.C.. St. Lucie Press, New York. pp. 12–28.Google Scholar
Howarth, F.G. 1991. Environmental impacts of classical biological control. Annual Review of Entomology, 36: 485–509.Google Scholar
Kelton, L.A. 1978. The Anthocoridae of Canada and Alaska (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae). The insects and arachnids of Canada. Part 4. Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa, Ontario.Google Scholar
Kingsley, P.C., and Harrington, B.J. 1981. Development of Orius insidiosus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) in relation to temperature. The Great Lakes Entomologist, 14: 141–144.Google Scholar
Loomans, A.J.M., Staneva, I., Huang, Y., Bukovinskiné-Kiss, G., and van Lenteren, J.C. 2002. When native non-target species go indoors: a new challenge to biocontrol of whiteflies in European greenhouses. International Organization for Biological Control, West Palearctic Regional Section Bulletin, 25(1): 139–142.Google Scholar
Louda, S.M., Pemberton, R.W., Johnson, M.T., and Follet, P.A. 2003. Nontarget effects — the Achilles heel of biological control? Retrospective analyses to reduce risk associated with biocontrol introductions. Annual Review of Entomology, 48: 365–396.Google Scholar
Maw, H.E.L., Foottit, R.G., Hamilton, K.G.A., and Scudder, G.G.E. 2000. A checklist of the Hemiptera of Canada and Alaska. NRC Research Press, Ottawa, Ontario.Google Scholar
Shipp, J.L., Gillespie, D.R., Fry, K.M., and Ferguson, G.M. 2002. Echinothrips americanus (Morgan), Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande), western flower thrips, and Thrips tabaci Lindeman, onion thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). In Biological control programmes in Canada, 1981–2000. Edited by Mason, P.G. and Huber, J.T.. CABI Publishing, New York. pp. 115–119.Google Scholar
Simberloff, D.S.P. 1996. How risky is biological control? Ecology, 77: 1965–1974.Google Scholar
Tonks, N.V. 1953. Annotated list of insects and mites collected on brambles in the lower Fraser Valley, British Columbia, 1951. Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia, 49: 27–29.Google Scholar
U.S. Naval Observatory. 2002. Astronomical applications: data services [online]. Available from http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/ [accessed 3 April 2002].Google Scholar
van den Meiracker, R.A.F. 1994. Induction and termination of diapause in Orius predatory bugs. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 73: 127–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Lenteren, J.C. 2000. A greenhouse without pesticides: fact or fantasy? Crop Protection, 19: 375–384.Google Scholar
van Lenteren, J.C., Babendreir, D., Bigler, F., Burgio, G., Hokkanen, H.M.T., Kuske, S., Loomans, A.J.M., Menzler-Hokkanen, I., van Rijn, P.C.J., Thomas, M.B., and Zeng, Q.-Q. 2003. Environmental risk assessment of exotic natural enemies used in inundative biological control. BioControl, 48: 3–38.Google Scholar