Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T13:26:30.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ON THE SYNONYMY OF TARSONEMUS WAITEI BANKS, T. SETIER EWING, AND T. BAKERI EWING, WITH REDESCRIPTION OF SPECIES (ACARI: TARSONEMIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Evert E. Lindquist
Evert E. Lindquist
Affiliation:
Biosystematics Research Institute, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa K1A 0C6
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Tarsonemus waitei Banks, 1912, T. setifer Ewing, 1939, and T. pauperoseatus Suski, 1967, are shown to be conspecific (new synonymy). Tarsonemus bakeri Ewing, 1939, thought to be conspecific with T. setifer for the last 25 years, is shown to be specifically distinct. Both sexes of these species are redescribed and reillustrated, and character state variability expressed within populations of T. waitei is discussed. The waitei species group, previously called the pauperoseatus group, is redescribed for these and other species. A provisional key to the known member species of this group is given. This group is judged to be insufficiently distinct from some of the other species of Tarsonemus to warrant recognition as a subgenus.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 110 , Issue 10 , October 1978 , pp. 1023 - 1048
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banks, N. 1912. New American mites. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 14: 96–99, 2 pl.Google Scholar
Beer, R.E. 1954. A revision of the Tarsonemidae of the Western Hemisphere (Order Acarina). Kans. Univ. Sci. Bull. 36: 1091–1387.Google Scholar
Carmona, M.M. 1966. Contribuição para o conhecimento dos Ácaros das plantas cultivadas em Portugal. Agron. Lusitana 26: 175–203.Google Scholar
Delfinado, M. D. 1977. Terrestrial mites of New York. V – Tarsonemidae. Jl N.Y. ent. Soc. 84: 255–274.Google Scholar
Ewing, H.E. 1939. A revision of the mites of the subfamily Tarsoneminae of North America, the West Indies and the Hawaiian Islands. Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. 653. 63 pp.Google Scholar
Flechtmann, C.H.W. 1967. Introdução à família Tarsonemidae Kramer, 1877 (Acarina) no estado de São Paulo. Anais da E.S.A. “Luis de Queiroz”, Piracicaba 24: 265–272.Google Scholar
Ito, Y. 1963. Six newly recorded species of tarsonemid-mites in Japan. Jap. J. appl. Ent. Zool. 7: 14–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeppson, L.R., Keifer, H.H., and Baker, E.W.. 1975. Mites injurious to economic plants. Univ. Calif. Press, Berkeley. xxiv + 614 pp., 64 pl.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karl, E. 1965. Untersuchungen zur Morphologie und Ökologie von Tarsonemiden gärtnerischer Kulturpflanzen. Biol. Zbl. 84: 331–357.Google Scholar
Lindquist, E.E. 1969. New species of Tarsonemus (Acarina: Tarsonemidae) associated with bark beetles. Can. Ent. 101: 1291–1314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindquist, E.E. 1972. A new species of Tarsonemus from stored grain (Acarina: Tarsonemidae). Can. Ent. 104: 1699–1708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindquist, E.E. 1977. Homology of dorsal opisthosomal plates, setae, and cupules of heterostigmatic mites with those of other eleutherengone Prostigmata (Acari). Acarologia 19: 97–104.Google Scholar
Lindquist, E.E. 1977. The world genera of Tarsonemidae (Acari: Heterostigmata): a morphological, phylogenetic and systematic revision. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. In prep.Google Scholar
McGregor, E.A. 1942. Recently discovered mite on citrus. Calif. Citrograph 27: 270.Google Scholar
McGregor, E.A. 1956. The mites of citrus trees in southern California. Mem. S. Calif. Acad. Sci. 3. 42 pp.Google Scholar
Muma, M.H. 1961. Mites associated with citrus in Florida. Bull. Fla agric. Exp. Stn 640. 39 pp.Google Scholar
Sinha, R.N. 1962. A note on associations of some mites with seed-borne fungi from the prairie provinces. Proc. ent. Soc. Manitoba 18: 51–53.Google Scholar
Sinha, R.N. 1964. Ecological relationships of stored-products mites and seed-borne fungi. Acarologia: Proc. First int. Congr. Acarology (Fort Collins, Colo.) 1963, pp. 372–389.Google Scholar
Sinha, R.N. and Wallace, H.A.H.. 1973. Population dynamics of stored-product mites. Oecologia 12: 315–327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smiley, R.L. 1964. Some Tarsonemidae from the Republic of the Congo. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 66: 145–150.Google Scholar
Suski, Z.W. 1965. Tarsonemid mites on apple trees in Poland. III. Tarsonemus lobosus n. sp. (Acarina, Tarsonemidae). Bull. Acad. pol. Sci., Cl. V, Ser. Sci., biol. 13: 587–593.Google Scholar
Suski, Z.W. 1967 a. Tarsonemid mites on apple trees in Poland. VII. Tarsonemus naegelei n. sp. (Acarina, Heterostigmata). Bull. Acad. pol. Sci., Cl. V, Ser. Sci., biol. 15: 41–46.Google Scholar
Suski, Z.W. 1967 b. Tarsonemid mites on apple trees in Poland. IX. Tarsonemus pauperoseatus n. sp. (Acarina, Heterostigmata). Bull. Acad. pol. Sci., Cl. V, Ser. Sci., biol. 15: 267–272.Google Scholar
Suski, Z.W. 1967 c. Badania nad roztoczami z rodziny Tarsonemidae (Acarina, Heterostigmata) wystepujacymi najabloniach w Polsce. Instytut Sadownictwa, Skiemiewice. 268 pp.Google Scholar
Suski, Z.W. 1968. Polish mites of the family Tarsonemidae (Acarina, Heterostigmata). Tarsonemus idaeus n. sp. Bull. Acad. pol. Sci., Cl. V, Ser. Sci., biol. 16: 637–642.Google Scholar
Suski, Z.W. 1972 a. Tarsonemid mites on apple trees in Poland. X. Laboratory studies on the biology of certain mite species of the family Tarsonemidae (Acarina, Heterostigmata). Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Roln. 129: 111–137.Google Scholar
Suski, Z.W. 1972 b. Tarsonemid mites on apple trees in Poland. XI. Field observations on the distribution and significance of Tarsonemidae (Acarina, Heterostigmata) in apple orchards. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Roln. 129: 139–157.Google Scholar