Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:54:19.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ON THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE MANDIBLE AS A DIAGNOSTIC CHARACTER IN THE TAXONOMY OF PENICILLATE DIPLOPODS (DIPLOPODA: POLYXENIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Kiyoshi Ishii
Kiyoshi Ishii
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Dokkyo University School of Medicine, Mibu, Tochigi Pref. 321–02, Japan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mandibles of four species and three subspecies of penicillate diplopods inhabiting Japan, and two species from outside Japan, were studied to clarify their taxonomic significance. The mandibular structure showed distinct differences both between genera and between species, indicating its usefulness in the taxonomy of penicillate diplopods.

Résumé

Les mandibules de quatre espèces de diplopodes pénicillés du Japon et de deux autres espèces de l’extérieur du Japon ont été étudiées afin de mettre en évidence leur valeur taxonomique. La structure mandibulaire diffère de façon significative entre les genres et les espèces, indiquant leur utilité en taxonomie des diplopodes péncillés.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 120 , Issue 11 , November 1988 , pp. 955 - 963
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Attems, C. 1907. Javanishe Myriapoden, gesammelt von Direktor K. Kraepelin im Jahre 1903. Mitt. naturh. Mus. Hamburg. 24 (1906): 77–142.Google Scholar
Brolemann, H.W. 1917. Macroxenus, nouveau genre de Myriapodes Pselaphognathes. Bull. Soc. Hist. nat. Afr. Nord. 8: 114–118.Google Scholar
Brolemann, H.W. 1935. Faune de France. 29 Myriapodes Diplopodes (Chilognathes I). Féd. Fr. Soc. Sci. natur. of Cent. Fau. Paris 29: 1–370.Google Scholar
Carpenter, G.H. 1905. Notes on the segmentation and phylogeny of the arthropoda, with an account of the maxillae in Polyxenus lagurus. Quart. J. Micr. Sci. 49: 469–491.Google Scholar
Enghoff, H. 1979. Taxonomic significance of the mandibles in the millipede Order Julida. pp. 27–38in Camatini, M. (Ed.), Myriapod Biology. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Humbert, A. 1893. Myriapodes des environs de Genève. Mém. Soc. Phys. Hist. nat. Genève 32: 1–92.Google Scholar
Ishii, K. 1983. A new species of penicillate diplopods of the family Polyxenidae (Diplopoda: Penicillata) from Japan. Can. Ent. 115: 1355–1357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latzel, R. 1884. Die Myriapoden des Österreichsch-Ungarischen Monarchie. II, Die Symphylen, Pauropoden und Diplopoden. Wien, I–XII, 1–414.Google Scholar
Linné, C. 1758. Systema Naturae. X: 637.Google Scholar
Miyosi, Y. 1947. A new species of Monographis from Japan. Acta arachnol. 10: 1–8. [In Japanese]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, M., and Condé, B.. 1982. Lophoproctidés insulaires de l'ocean Pacifique (Diplopodes Penicillates). Bull. Mus. natn. Hist. nat., Paris 4: 95–118.Google Scholar
Reinecke, G. 1910. Beitrage zur Kenntnis von Polyxenus. Jena Z. natw. 46: 845–896.Google Scholar
Takakuwa, Y. 1954. The Diplopods of Japan and its Adjacent Territories. Jap. Soc. promot. Sci., Tokyo. 241 pp. [In Japanese]Google Scholar
Takakuwa, Y., and Takashima, H.. 1942. An outline of Micronesian myriapods. Acta arachnol. 7: 120–124. [In Japanese]Google Scholar
Takashima, H., and Haga, A.. 1950. Notes on Polyxenidae of Japan. Acta arachnol. 12: 21–26. [In Japanese with English summary]CrossRefGoogle Scholar