Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T19:42:41.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

NOTES ON THE BIOLOGY OF TELENOMUS COELODASIDIS (HYMENOPTERA: SCELIONIDAE) AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO THE SADDLED PROMINENT, HETEROCAMPA GUTTIVITTA (LEPIDOPTERA: NOTODONTIDAE)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Mark Ticehurst  and
Douglas C. Allen
Mark Ticehurst
Affiliation:
Department of Forest Entomology, State University College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, New York 13210
Douglas C. Allen
Affiliation:
Department of Forest Entomology, State University College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, New York 13210
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A biological study of Telenomus coelodasidis Ashm. revealed a close temporal synchronization between this egg parasitoid and its primary host, Heterocampa guttivitta (Wlkr.). The wasp reproduced parthenogenetically in the laboratory and completed development in unfertilized host eggs. Wasp activity was greatest at relatively low temperatures, and longevity was significantly greater when individuals were provided with food. The second and third stage larvae and the pupa are described, as well as the sequence of visible changes occurring in parasitized host eggs. The egg stage of H. guttivitia should be sampled about 5–7 days after peak oviposition by the host, and eggs held for 4–6 days to obtain an accurate estimate of apparent mortality.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 105 , Issue 8 , August 1973 , pp. 1133 - 1143
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, D. C. 1972. Insect parasites of the saddled prominent, Heterocampa guttivitta (Lepidoptera: Notodontidae), in the northeastern United States. Can. Ent. 4: 1609–1622.Google Scholar
Allen, D. C. 1973. Notes on the fecundity of Heterocampa guttivitta (Lepidoptera: Notodontidae). In press.Google Scholar
Allen, D. C. and Grimble, D. G.. 1970. Identification of the larval instars of Heterocampa guttivitta with notes on their feeding behavior. J. econ. Ent. 63: 1201–1203.Google Scholar
Ashmead, W. H. 1893. Monograph of the North American Proctotrupidae. U.S. natl. Mus. Bull. 45.Google Scholar
Baker, W. L. 1972. Eastern Forest Insects. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv., Misc. Publ. 1175. 642 pp.Google Scholar
Balch, R. E. 1932. The fir tussock moth (Hemerocampa pseudotsuga McD.). J. econ. Ent. 25: 1143–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balduf, W. V. 1926. Telenomus cosmopeplae Gahan, an egg parasite of Cosmopeplae bimaculata Thomas. J. econ. Ent. 19: 829–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boldaruev, V. O. 1952. Parasites of the Siberian lasiocampid (Dendrolimus sibericus Tshtv.) in eastern Siberia. Ent. Obozr. 32: 56–68.Google Scholar
Burgess, A. F. 1921. The satin moth: an introduced enemy of poplars and willows. U.S. Dep. Agric. Dep. Circ. 167. 16 pp.Google Scholar
Ciesla, W. M. 1964. Observations on the life history of Telenomus alsophilae, an egg parasite of the elm spanworm, Ennomus subsignarius. J. econ. Ent. 54: 702–704.Google Scholar
Clausen, C. P. 1972. Entomophagous insects. Hafner, New York. 688 pp.Google Scholar
Cooperative Economic Insect Report, Sept. 22, 1972. PPD, USDA, ARS, Vol. 22, No. 38.Google Scholar
Costa Lima, A. da. 1928 Notas sobre a biologia do Telenomus fariai Lima, parasito dos ovos de Triatoma. Mem. Inst. Osw. Cruz 21: 201–209.Google Scholar
Drooz, A. T. 1964. A source of elm spanworm parasites. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Res. Note SE-34.Google Scholar
Ganesalingam, V. K. 1966. Some environmental factors influencing parasitization of the eggs of Nezara viridula L. (Pentatomidae) by Telenomus basalis Wollaston (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae). Ceylon J. Sci. (Bio Sci.) 6: 1–14.Google Scholar
Griffiths, K. F. 1956. Parasitism of the eggs of Neodiprion lecontei. For. Biol. Div., Bi-mon. Prog. Rep. 12: 2.Google Scholar
Grimble, D. G., Knight, F. B., and Nord, J. C.. 1971. Associated insects reared from galls of Saperda inornata (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) on trembling aspen in Michigan. Mich. Ent. 4: 53–58.Google Scholar
Grimble, D. G. and Newell, R. G.. 1972. Saddled prominent oviposition studies in New York and adjacent states. AFRI Res. Rep. 12. SUNY Coll. of Environ. Sci. and For., Syracuse. 38 pp.Google Scholar
Grimble, D. G. and Newell, R. G.. 1973 a. Damage to sugar maple in New York State from saddled prominent defoliation. AFRI Res. Note 7. SUNY Coll. of Environ. Sci. and For., Syracuse. 4 pp.Google Scholar
Grimble, D. G. and Newell, R. G.. 1973 b. Saddled prominent moth emergence and oviposition period. AFRI Res. Rep. 13. SUNY Coll. of Environ. Sci. and For., Syracuse. 10 pp.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, S. 1961. Caterpillars on oak. Conn. agric. Exp. Stn Bull. 641. 15 pp.Google Scholar
Hodson, A. C. 1939. Biological notes on the egg parasites of Malacosoma disstria Hbn. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 32: 131–136.Google Scholar
Hokyo, N., Kiritani, K., Natasuji, F., and Shiga, M.. 1966. Comparative biology of the two scelionid egg parasites of Nezara viridula L. (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Appl. Ent. Zool. 1: 94–102.Google Scholar
Jubb, G. L. and Watson, T. F.. 1971. Parasitization capabilities of the pentatomid egg parasite Telenomus utahensis (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 64: 453–456.Google Scholar
Kolomiets, L. G. and Novalenok, A. V.. 1968. Biologiya yaitsseeda, Telenomus gracilis Mayr (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae). Akad. Nauk S.S.S.R. 10: 96–106.Google Scholar
Kozlov, M. A. 1967. Palearctic species of egg parasites of the genus Telenomus Haliday (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae: Telenominae). Ent. Obozr. 46: 361–378.Google Scholar
Krombein, K. V. and Burks, B. D. (Eds.). 1967. Hymenoptera of America north of Mexico. Synoptic catalog. Agriculture Monogr. 3 (Suppl. 2).Google Scholar
Miller, R. L. 1928. Telenomus megacephalus Ashm., a parasite of the green pumpkin bug, Nezara viridula L., in Florida. Fla Ent. 12: 17–20.Google Scholar
Minnoch, M. W. and Parker, D. C.. 1971. Life history of a looper, Lambdina punctata, in Utah (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 64: 386–389.Google Scholar
Morril, A. W. 1907. Description of a new species of Telenomus with observations on its habits and life history. Am. Nat. 41: 417–430.Google Scholar
Muesebeck, C. F. W., Krombein, K. V., and Townes, H. K.. 1951. Hymenoptera of America north of Mexico. Synoptic catalog. Agriculture Monogr. 2. 1420 pp.Google Scholar
Otvos, I. S. and Bryant, D. G.. 1972. An extraction method for rapid sampling of eastern hemlock looper eggs, Lambdina fiscellaria fiscellaria (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Can. Ent. 104: 1511–1514.Google Scholar
Parker, J. and Houston, D. R.. 1971. Effects on repeated defoliation on root and root collar extractives of sugar maple trees. Forest Sci. 17: 91–95.Google Scholar
Pemberton, C. E. 1933. Notes on the biology of Telenonmus nawai Ashm., an important parasite of the army worm, Spodoptera mauritia (Boisd.). Hawaiian Planter‘s Rec. 37: 168–174.Google Scholar
Rabb, R. L. and Bradley, J. R.. 1970. Marking host eggs by Telenomus sphingis. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 63: 1053–1056.Google Scholar
Rabinovich, J. E. 1970. Population dynamics of Telenomus fariai (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae), a parasite of chagas' disease vectors. VI. Ability to discriminate between parasitized and nonparasitized hosts. Acta Cient. Venezolana 21: 154–156.Google ScholarPubMed
Rauschenberger, J. L. and Talerico, R. L.. 1967. Egg parasitism of the fall cankerworm. J. econ. Ent. 60: 881–882.Google Scholar
Romanova, Ju. S. 1951. Biological control of Malacosoma neustria. Dokl. vseojuz. Akad. sel.-hoz. Nauk Lenina 16: 30–34.Google Scholar
Romanova, Ju. S. and Lozinskij, V. A.. 1960. Experiments on the practical use of the egg parasites of Malacosoma neustria in forest conditions. Zool. Z. Moskva 37: 542–547.Google Scholar
Rose, A. H. 1969. Noteworthy forest insects in Ontario in 1963. Proc. ent. Soc. Ont. 99: 7–11.Google Scholar
Rose, A. H. 1970. Noteworthy forest insects in Ontario in 1969. Proc. ent. Soc. Ont. 100: 11–13.Google Scholar
Talerico, R. L. 1968. Life history of the looper Phigalia titea in Virginia. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 61: 557–561.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. R. 1958. A catalogue of the parasites and predators of insect pests. Commonwealth Agric. Bureaux, Farnham Royal, England.Google Scholar