Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T12:04:45.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Notes on Occurrence of Typhlodromus and Phytoseius spp. in Southern British Columbia (Acarina: Phytoseiinae)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

N. H. Anderson ,
D. A. Chant  and
C. V. G. Morgan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Phytoseiid mites are of cosmopolitan interest because they are predacious on many phytophagous mites (Tetranychidae, Eriophyidae, and Tarsonemidae) that are pests of agricultural crops. They have been studied in orchards (Collyer, 1953, 1956; Lord, 1949), vineyards (Mathys, 1955), citrus groves (Fleschner and Ricker, 1954; Muma, 1955), and strawberry plantings (Huffaker and Kennett, 1953, 1956), but few workers have recorded their presence in native environments. In the commercial fruit-growing areas of British Columbia, orchards are often planted near uncultivated areas of bush or grassland. The study on which these notes are based was undertaken to determine whether the phytoseiids that occur in these native sites become established in the orchards, and to obtain a knowledge of the entire phytoseiid fauna of the area, a necessary prerequisite to ecological studies of predacious mites in orchards.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 90 , Issue 5 , May 1958 , pp. 275 - 279
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banks, N. 1909. New Canadian mites. Proc. Ent. Soc. Washington 11: 133–143.Google Scholar
Berlese, . 1914. Acari nuovi. Redia 10: 113–150.Google Scholar
Chant, D. A. 1955. Notes on mites of the genus Typhlodromus Scheuten, 1857 (Acarina: Laelaptidae), with descriptions of the males of some species and the female of a new species. Canadian Ent. 87. 496–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chant, D. A. 1956. Some mites of the subfamily Phytoseiinae (Acarina: Laelaptidae) from southeastern England, wlth descilptions of new species. Canadian Ent. 88: 26–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chant, D. A. 1957. Descriptions of some phytoseiine mites (Acarina: Phytoseiinae). Part I. Nine new species from British Columbia with keys to the species of British Columbia. Part II. Redescriptions of eight species described by Berlese. Canadian Ent. 89. 289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collyer, E. 1953. Biology of some predatory insects and mites associated with the fruit tree red spider mite (Metatetranychus ulmi (Koch)) in southeastern England. IV. The predator-mite relationship. J. Hort. Sci. 28. 246–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collyer, E. 1956. Notes on the biology of some predacious mites on fruit trees in southeastern England. Bull. Ent. Res. 47: 205–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunliffe, F., and Baker, E. W.. 1953. A guide co the predatory phytoseiid mites of the United States. Pinellas Biol. Lab. Pub. No. 1.Google Scholar
Fleschner, C. A., and Ricker, D. W.. 1954. Typhlodromid mites on citrus and avocado trees in southern California. J. Econ. Ent. 47: 356–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garman, P. 1948. Mite species from apple trees in Connecticut. Connecticut Agr. Expt. Sta. Bull. 520.Google Scholar
Henderson, C. F., and McBurnie, H. V.. 1943. Sampling techniques for determining populations of the citrus red mite and its predators. United States Dept. Agr. Circ. 671.Google Scholar
Huffaker, C. B., and Kennett, C. E.. 1953. Developments toward biological control of cyclamen mite on strawberries in California. J. Econ. Ent. 46: 802–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffaker, C. B., and Kennett, C. E.. 1956. Experimental studies on predation: predation and cyclamen-mite populations on strawberries in California. Hilgardia 26: 191–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, F. T. 1949. The influence of spray programs on the fauna of apple orchards in Nova Scotia. III. Mites and their predators. Canadian Ent. 81: 202–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathys, G. 1955. Etude faunistique des acariens des pommiers en Suisse Romande. Ann. Agr. Suisse 56: 815–825.Google Scholar
Muma, M. H. 1955. Factors contributing to the natural control of citrus insects and mites in Florida. J. Econ. Ent. 48: 432–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesbitt, H. H. J. 1951. A taxonomic study of the Phytoseiinae (Family Laelaptidae) predacious upon Tetranychidae of economic importance Zool. Verb. 12.Google Scholar
Oudemans, A. C. 1905. Bizonderheden over bekende en niewe Acari. Tijdschr. Ent. 48. 77–81.Google Scholar
Oudemans, A. C. 1915. Acarologisch aanteekeningen 56. Ent. Ber. 4: 180–188.Google Scholar
Oudemans, A. C. 1929. Acarologisch aanteekeningen 99–100. Ent. Ber. 8: 11–36.Google Scholar
Oudemans, A. C. 1930. Acarologisch aanteekeningen 105. Ent. Ber. 8: 48–99.Google Scholar
Ribaga, C. 1902. Gamasidi planticoli. Riv. Pat. veg. 10: 175–178.Google Scholar
Willmann, C. 1952. Die Milbenfauna der Noorseeinsel Wangerooge. Verböff. Inst. Meeresforsch. Bremerhaven 1: 146.Google Scholar