Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:43:00.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Notes on Life-History and Taxonomy of Ceruraphis eriophori (Wlk.) and Neoceruraphis viburnicola (Gill.), and a Description of the Apterous Viviparous Female of Neoceruraphis viburnicola (Gill.) (Homoptera: Aphididae)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

M. E. MacGillivray
M. E. MacGillivray
Affiliation:
Entomology and Plant Pathology Section, Research Station, Research Branch, Canada Department of Agriculture, Fredericton, N.B.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In New Brunswick, Ceruraphis eriophori (Wlk., 1848) and Neoceruraphis viburnicola (Gill., 1909) are readily found in spring and autumn on their Viburnum hosts. I have collected both species from the curled leaves of these primary hosts (C. eriophori from Viburnum lantana L. and V. opulus L. and N. viburnicola from V. opulus var. roseum L. and V. trilobum Marsh.) In Colorado, Palmer (1952) recorded borh species from V. opulus var. sterile (= V. opulus var. roseum).

The known secondary host plants of C. eriophori in Europe are species of Carex, Eriophorum, Luzula, and Typha (Börner, 1952); in North America, Cyperus virens Michx. is the only one reported (Palmer, 1952). The secondary hosts of N. viburnicola have not been recorded (Palmer, 1952; Shaposhinkov, 1956), nor has the apterous viviparous female been described.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 92 , Issue 9 , September 1960 , pp. 704 - 707
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Börner, C. 1916. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der wandernden Blattläuse Deutschlands. Mitt. Biol. Anst. Berlin 16: 25–42.Google Scholar
Börner, C. 1926. Züchtung der Homopteren. In Abderhalden, Handb. biol. Arbeitsmethoden, Abt. 9, Teil 1, 2 Hälfte, Heft 2: 215–270.Google Scholar
Börner, C. 1930. Beiträge zu einem neuen System der Blattläuse. Arch. klass. phyl. Ent. 1: 115–180.Google Scholar
Börner, C. 1952. Europae centralis aphides, die Blattläuse Mitteleuropas, Namen, Synonyme, Wirtspflanzen, Generationszyklen. Mitt. thüring. bot. Ges. Beith. 3. 259 pp.Google Scholar
Börner, C. anl Schilder, F. A.. 1932. Aphidoidea, Blattläuse. In (Sorauer) Handb. d. Pflkrankh., Ed. 4, vol. 5: 551–715.Google Scholar
Fraussen, C. J. H. 1927. Apbis fabae Scop, en aanverwante soorten in Nederland. Tijdschr. Plantenziekten 33: 193–282.Google Scholar
Gillette, C. P. 1909. American snowball louse, Aphis viburnicola n. sp. Ent. News 20: 280–285.Google Scholar
Gillette, C. P. and Palmer, M. A.. 1932. The Aphidae of Colorado. Part II. Ann. Ent. Soc. America 25: 369–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, M. A. 1952. Aphids of the Rocky Mountain region. Thomas Say Foundation 5. 452 pp.Google Scholar
Shaposhnikov, G. H. 1956. Phylogenetic basis of the classification of the short-caudaed aphids (Anuraphidina) with a consideration of their host relationships [in Russian]. Trudy Zool. Inst., Akad. Nauk S.S.S.R., 23: 215–230.Google Scholar