Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:08:30.403Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

NOTES ON “A REVISION OF THE GENUS ARGYNNIS,” BY HENRY J. ELWES, F. L. S., F. Z. S., Etc

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

W. H. Edwards
Affiliation:
Coalburgh, West VA.

Extract

So much of the text of Mr. Elwe' paper as relates to North American Species has recently been printed in Psyche (March), but the synonymic list, which is most important for a full comprehension of the state of mind of the author, was omitted. I applied to the editor of the Can. Ent. to print the list, but it was found that it would occupy nearly one-half the space of a number, and it was not thought expedient to give it.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1890

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* There are many cases among the Heterocera, where the larvæ alone are relied on for distinguishing speices, vide Weismann's Theory, p. 543, Eng. Ed. “In the sphingidæ, cases are not wanting in which the moths are far more closely allied than the larvæ. This is especially striking in the genus Deilephila, eight species of which are allied in the imaginal state, in a remarkable degree, whilst the larvæ differ greatly from one another in color, and to as great an extent in marking.” In the case of D. Euphorbiœ and Nicœa, whilst the larvæ show great differences * * * the moths cannot be distinguished with certainty. The imago of the rare Nicœa is, for this reason, wanting in most collections; it cannot be detected whether a specimen is genuine, i. e., whether it may not perhaps be a somewhat large example of Euphorbiœ.”