Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:30:54.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New species of the genus Phtheiropoios (Phthiraptera: Gyropidae), parasitic on Ctenomys (Rodentia: Octodontidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Dolores del Carmen Castro  and
Armando Cicchino
Dolores del Carmen Castro*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Natural Sciences, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Paseo del Bosque, s/n, 1900, La Plata, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina
Armando Cicchino
Affiliation:
Scientific Department of Entomology, Museo de La Plata, Paseo del Bosque, sin, 1900, La Plata, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina
*
1 Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed (E-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The species Phtheiropoios centralissp.nov. is described and illustrated from specimens collected on an undescribed species of Ctenomys from Rio Quinto, central Córdoba Province, Argentina. Diagnostic features for the new species include proportion of the male forficula, male external genitalia, and counts of setae and body measurements in both sexes. Its morphological affinities with other species and a key to males of all species of the genus Phtheiropoios known to parasitize rodents of the genus Ctenomys are included.

Résumé

On trouvera ici la description illustrée de Phtheiropoios centralissp.nov. Les spécimens de cette espèce ont été récoltés sur Ctenomys sp. de la localité de Rio Quinto, Córdoba, en Argentine. Les caractéristiques diagnostiques de cette espèce, ainsi que sa position par rapport aux autres espèces de Phtheiropoios sont discutés. Une clé permettra l’identification des mâles de toutes les espèces de Phtheiropoios qui parasitent les rongeurs du genre Ctenomys.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 133 , Issue 1 , February 2001 , pp. 87 - 92
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Castro, D del C, Cicchino, A.C. 1978. Contribución al conocimiento de los Malófagos argentinos III. Sobre algunos Menoponidae de la avifauna bonaerense: Menacanthus eurysternus (Burmeister) y Menacanthus pici (Denny) (Insecta: Mallophaga). Revista de la Sociedad Entomologica Argentina 37(1–4): 77–83Google Scholar
Cicchino, A.C., Castro, D del C. 1998. Phtheiropoios mendocinus sp.nov. y estado del conocimiento de las demás especies del género Phtheiropoios Eichler, 1940 (Phthiraptera: Gyropidae) en la provincia de Mendoza, Argentina. Gayana Zoologia 62: 183–90Google Scholar
Cicchino, A.C., Castro, D del C, Baldo, J.J. 2000. Elenco de los Phthiraptera (Insecta) hallados en distintas poblaciones locales de Ctenomys (Rodentia: Octodontidae) de Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay, Bolivia y Brasil. Papéis Avulsos do Departamento de Zoología de São Paulo. São Paulo, Brazil: Museu de Zoología da Universidade de São PauloGoogle Scholar
Contreras, J.R., Bidau, C.J. 1999. Líneas generales del panorama evolutivo de los roedores excavadores sudamericanos del género Ctenomys (Mammalia, Rodentia, Caviomorpha: Ctenomyidae). Fundación Bartolomé Hidalgo, Ciencia Siglo XXI, Buenos Aires, Argentina 1: 1–22Google Scholar
Contreras, J.R., Castro, D del C, Cicchino, A.C. 1999. Relaciones de los Phthiraptera (Insecta, Amblycera, Gyropidae) con la evolución taxonómica del género Ctenomys (Mammalia: Rodentia: Ctenomyidae). Fundación Bartolomé Hidalgo, Ciencia Siglo XXI, Buenos Aires, Argentina 2: 1–32Google Scholar
Reig, O.A., Busch, C., Ortells, M.O., Contreras, J. 1990. An overview of evolution, systematics, population biology, cytogenetics, molecular biology and speciation in Ctenomys. pp 71–96in Nevo, E., Reig, O. (Eds), Evolution of subterranean mammals at the organismal and molecular levels. Progress in Clinical and Biological Research. Volume 335. New York: Wiley–LissGoogle Scholar