Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:10:02.472Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A New mite, Zwickia gibsoni n.sp., Fam. Anoetidae, from the pitchers of Sarracenia purpurea L.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Herbert H. J. Nesbitt
Affiliation:
Carleton College, Ottawa

Extract

When in 1948 I first made the acquaintance of the mite about to be described I was intrigued with the idea that a form morphologically so similar to those described by Oudemans, 1915 and Hirst 1928 should come from such a different habitat. Whilst recognizing the totally different geographical areas, sphagnum bogs of boreal Canada as opposed to humid forests of tropical Ceylon and Malaya, the question arises as to whether the micro-habitat in which these three species live is so totally different. From the published material available (vide Thienemann 1928-29), which I admit is not very extensive, there does not seem to be much chemical difference between the waters of Nepenthes and those of Sarracenia. The similarity of these two micro-habitats is further substantiated by the fact that copepods of the genus Parastenocaris have been found in the pitchers of Sarracenia which closely resemble those described by Menzel 1921, Chappius 1931 and Thienemann 1928-29 (quoting from Ghosh, no reference given) from the water of Nepenthes. The question of distribution over such great distances and over what must be long ages poses certain difficulties which can only be answered when we know more about the past history and distribution of pitcher plants and mites. The possession of an hypopial stage by all three species does offer some help in the problem but the further question of how the Canadian mites have adapted themselves to the rigours of a northern winter is difficult to understand.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hirst, S. 1928. A new Tyroglyphid mite (Zwickia nepenthesiana, sp. n.) from the pitchers of Nepenthes ampullaria. Jour. Malayan Br. Roy. Asiatic Soc. 6 (3): 1922.Google Scholar
Thienemann, A. 19281829. “Tropische Binnengewässer”. Archiv. fur Hydrobiologie. 11 (suppl.): 913.Google Scholar
Oudemans, A. C. 1915. Anoetus guentheri nov. sp. (in Guenther, K., 1915. Die lebenden Bewohner der Kannen der Pflanze Nepenthes destillatoria auf Ceylon). Zeitschrift f. wissen. Insektenbiologie 11(1): 242243.Google Scholar
Oudemans, A. C. 1924. Acarologische Anteekeningen LXXVI. Entom. Ber 6(139): 309310.Google Scholar
Menzel, R. 1921. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Mikrofauna von Niederländisch-Ostindien. I Moosbewohnende Harpacticiden. Treubia 2: 137145.Google Scholar
Chappius, P. A. 1931. Copepoda, Harpactoida der Deutschen Limnologischen Sunda—Expedition. “Tropische Binnengewässer”. I Arch. f Hydrobiol. 8 (Suppl.): 512584.Google Scholar
Vitzthum, H. Graf, 1931. Terrestrische Acarinen der Deutschen Limnologischen Sunda—Expedition. “Tropische Binnengewässer” II. Archiv. f Hydrobiol. 9: 121134.Google Scholar
Nesbitt, H. H. J. 1945. A Revision of the family Acaridae (Tyroglyphidae) order Acari, based on comparative morphological studies. Can. J. Res., D, 23: 139188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed