Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:24:15.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New host and locality records for endoparasitic nasal mites (Acari: Rhinonyssidae, Turbinoptidae, and Ereynetidae) infesting birds in Manitoba, Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2016

Wayne Knee*
Affiliation:
Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids, and Nematodes, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling Avenue, K.W. Neatby Building, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0C6, Canada
Terry D. Galloway
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3T 2N2, Canada
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).

Abstract

Four families of parasitic mites (Acari: Rhinonyssidae, Ereynetidae, Cytoditidae, and Turbinoptidae) have evolved independently to live inside the nasal passages of birds. A previous survey of nasal mites in Canada drew attention to the dearth of knowledge about these specialised mites, and indicated there were more species of nasal mites to discover in Canada. Since 2008, we have continued to survey nasal mites and herein present the details from infested hosts, 92 host individuals representing 64 species from 11 orders and 23 families. We report 18 new records for species of nasal mites in Canada: 16 Rhinonyssidae, one Ereynetidae, and one Turbinoptidae. No Cytoditidae have yet been recorded in Canada. We also collected five undescribed species of rhinonyssids. A total of 64 host-parasite species records are reported, and of these records, 52 rhinonyssids, one ereynetid, and three turbinoptids are new for Canada. Nasal mites were not collected from 127 host species, and several of these host species were sampled extensively (⩾50 individuals). This research furthers our understanding of avian nasal mites in Canada and highlights the need for continued investigations on these mites.

Type
Biodiversity & Evolution
Copyright
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Subject editor: Derek Sikes

References

Akimov, A., Badanin, I.V., and Zabludovskaya, S.A. 2003. Ereynetid mites (Prostigmata, Ereynetidae) and the paths of their specialization to parasitism. Acarina, 11: 6572.Google Scholar
American Ornithologists’ Union. 1983. Check-list of North American birds, 7th edition, American Ornithologists’ Union, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.Google Scholar
Ballard, J.T. and Ring, R.A. 1979. The ectoparasites of some marine birds from Bamfield Marine Station, British Columbia, with particular reference to the common murre (Uria aalge (Pont.)). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 57: 19801984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, P.J. 1996a. The life history and transmission biology of Sternostoma tracheacolum Lawrence (Acari: Rhinonyssidae) associated with the Gouldian finch Erythrura gouldiae . Experimental and Applied Acarology, 20: 323334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, P.J. 1996b. Survey of the nasal mite fauna (Rhinonyssidae and Kytoditidae) of the Gouldian finch, Erythrura gouldiae, and some co-occurring birds in the Northern Territory. Wildlife Research, 23: 675685.Google Scholar
Butenko, O.M. 1984. Non-passerine nasal mites of Russia. Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Science, Saint Petersburg, Russia.Google Scholar
Butenko, O.M. and Stanyukovich, M.K. 1999. The distribution of rhinonyssid mites (Acari, Gamasina, Rhinonyssidae) in the nasal cavities of some anatid birds. Ekologiya, 2: 5256.Google Scholar
Colwell, R.K. 1973. Competition and coexistence in a simple tropical community. The American Naturalist, 107: 737760.Google Scholar
de Rojas, M., Mora, M.D., Ubeda, J.M., Cutillas, C., Navajas, M., and Guevara, D.C. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships in rhinonyssid mites (Acari: Rhinonyssidae) based on ribosomal DNA sequences: insights for the discrimination of closely related species. Parasitology Research, 88: 675681.Google Scholar
Domrow, R. 1969. The nasal mites of Queensland birds (Acari: Dermanyssidae, Ereynetidae, and Epidermoptidae). Proceedings of the Linnaean Society of New South Wales, 93: 297426.Google Scholar
Fain, A. 1994. Adaptation, specificity and host-parasite coevolution in mites (Acari). International Journal for Parasitology, 24: 12731283.Google Scholar
Fain, A. and Hyland, K.E. 1962. The mites parasitic in the lungs of birds. The variability of Sternostoma tracheacolum Lawrence, 1948, in domestic and wild birds. Parasitology, 52: 401424.Google Scholar
George, J.E. 1961. The nasal mites of the genus Ptilonyssus (Acarina: Rhinonyssidae) occurring on some North American passeriform birds. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 34: 105132.Google Scholar
Hood, D.E. and Welch, H.E. 1980. A seasonal study of the parasites of the red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus L.) in Manitoba and Arkansas. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 58: 528537.Google Scholar
Hyland, K.E. 1962. Two new nasal mites, Ptilonyssus morofskyi, n.sp., and Sternostoma porteri n.sp., from North American birds (Acarina; Rhinonyssidae). Bulletin of the Brooklyn Entomological Society, 57: 146156.Google Scholar
Knee, W. and Proctor, H. 2010. Interactive HTML-based dichotomous key to female Rhinonyssidae (Mesostigmata) from birds in Canada. Canadian Journal of Arthropod Identification, 9: 164. doi:10.3752/cjai.2010.09.Google Scholar
Knee, W., Proctor, H., and Galloway, T. 2008. Survey of nasal mites (Rhinonyssidae, Ereynetidae, and Turbinoptidae) associated with birds in Alberta and Manitoba, Canada. The Canadian Entomologist, 140: 364379.Google Scholar
Maa, T.C. and Kuo, J.S. 1965. A field survey of arthropod parasites of birds in Taiwan. Journal of Medical Entomology, 1: 395401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, R.W. and Rhodes, W.L. 1960. New host records for the mesostigmatid nasal mite Rhinonyssus rhinonlethrum (Acarina: Rhinonyssidae). The Southwestern Naturalist, 5: 107108.Google Scholar
Pence, D.B. 1973. The nasal mites of birds from Louisiana, IX. Synopsis. Journal of Parasitology, 59: 881892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pence, D.B. 1975. Keys, species and host list, and bibliography for nasal mites of North American birds (Acarina: Rhinonyssinae, Turbinoptinae, Speleognathinae, and Cytoditidae). Special Publications of the Museum Texas Tech University, 8: 1148.Google Scholar
Pence, D.B. and Young, V.E. 1979. Rallinyssus sorae sp. n. (Acari: Dermanyssidae: Rhinonyssinae) from the nasal passages of the sora, Porzana carolina (Aves: Rallidae). Journal of Parasitology, 65: 791793.Google Scholar
Porter, J.C. and Strandtmann, R.W. 1952. Nasal mites of the English sparrow. Texas Journal of Science, 4: 393399.Google Scholar
Proctor, H.C. and Owens, I. 2000. Mites and birds: diversity, parasitism and coevolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 15: 358364.Google Scholar
Rózsa, L., Reiczigel, J., and Majoros, G. 2000. Quantifying parasites in samples of hosts. Journal of Parasitology, 86: 228232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spicer, G.S. 1978. A new species and several new host records of avian nasal mites (Acarina: Rhinonyssinae, Turbinoptinae). Journal of Parasitology, 64: 891894.Google Scholar
Spicer, G.S. 1987. Prevalence and host-parasite list of some nasal mites from birds (Acarina: Rhinonyssidae, Speleognathidae). Journal of Parasitology, 73: 259264.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Knee and Galloway supplementary material

Table S1

Download Knee and Galloway supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 110.2 KB