Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T19:12:59.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

NEST SITE SELECTION BY BUMBLE BEES (HYMENOPTERA: APIDAE) IN SOUTHERN ALBERTA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

K. W. Richards
K. W. Richards
Affiliation:
Research Station, Agriculture Canada, Lethbridge, Alberta T1J 4B1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The niche breadth and overlap in nesting preferences of 15 species of bumble bees were investigated in Alberta. Some of the factors that influence the distribution of nesting sites and abundance of species and permit the species to coexist in sympatry are discussed. Artificial domiciles were used as potential nesting sites. Some species were specialists in terms of nest site selection while others were generalists. The few natural nests found, the long periods spent by queens searching for nests, the high frequency of usurpation or direct interference and death of intruders, and the frequency of high niche overlap values between species are evidence that nesting sites are limited and are incompletely partitioned among the coexisting species. Usurpation also demonstrates the competition among individuals and species. Phenological differences in nest establishment influence the competition among the species. Camouflaging of tunnels presumably reduces the intensity of usurpation and protects queens and the brood from inclement weather and from social parasites (e.g., Psithyrus) and predators.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 110 , Issue 3 , 01 March 1978 , pp. 301 - 318
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brian, A. D. 1954. The foraging of bumble bees. Bee World 35: 61–67, 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colwell, R. K. and Futuyma, D. J.. 1971. On the measurement of niche breadth and overlap. Ecology 52: 567–576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cumber, R. A. 1949. The biology of humble-bees, with special reference to the production of the worker caste. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 100: 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cumber, R. A. 1953. Some aspects of the biology and ecology of humble-bees bearing upon the yields of red-clover seed in New Zealand. N.Z. Sci. Technol. 34: 227–240.Google Scholar
Cumber, R. A. 1963. Studies on an unusually large nest of Bombus terrestris (L.) (Hymenoptera, Apidae) transferred to an observation box. N.Z. J. Sci. 6: 66–74.Google Scholar
Farris, J. S. 1970. Methods for computing Wagner trees. Syst. Zool. 19: 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Free, J. B. and Butler, C. G.. 1959. Bumblebees. Collins, London. 208 pp.Google Scholar
Haartman, L. von. 1957. Adaptation in hole-nesting birds. Evolution 11: 339–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasselrot, T. B. 1960. Studies on Swedish bumblebees (genus Bombus Latr.) their domestication and biology. Opusc. ent. Suppl. 17. 192 pp.Google Scholar
Hobbs, G. A. 1964 a. Phylogeny of bumble bees based on brood-rearing behavior. Can. Ent. 96: 115–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, G. A. 1964 b. Ecology of species of Bombus Latr. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in southern Alberta. I. Subgenus Alpinobombus Skor. Can. Ent. 96: 1465–1470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, G. A. 1965 a. Ecology of species of Bombus Latr. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in southern Alberta. II. Subgenus Bombias Robt. Can. Ent. 97: 120–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, G. A. 1965 b. Ecology of species of Bombus Latr. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in southern Alberta. III. Subgenus Cullumanobombus Vogt. Can. Ent. 97: 1293–1302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, G. A. 1966 a. Ecology of species of Bombus Latr. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in southern Alberta. IV. Subgenus Fervidobombus Skor. Can. Ent. 98: 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, G. A. 1966 b. Ecology of species of Bombus Latr. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in southern Alberta. V. Subgenus Subterraneobombus Vogt. Can. Ent. 98: 288–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, G. A. 1967 a. Obtaining and protecting red-clover pollinating species of Bombus (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Can. Ent. 99: 943–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, G. A. 1967 b. Ecology of species of Bombus (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in southern Alberta. VI. Subgenus Pyrobombus. Can. Ent. 99: 1271–1292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, G. A. 1968. Ecology of species of Bombus (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in southern Alberta. VII. Subgenus Bombus. Can. ent. 100: 156–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, G. A., Nummi, W. O., and Virostek, J. F.. 1962. Managing colonies of bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) for pollination purposes. Can. Ent. 94: 1121–1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, G. A., Virostek, J. F., and Nummi, W. O.. 1960. Establishment of Bombus spp. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in artificial domiciles in southern Alberta. Can. Ent. 92: 868–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janzen, D. H. 1971. The ecological significance of an arboreal nest of Bombus pullatus in Costa Rica. J. Kans. ent. Soc. 44: 210–216.Google Scholar
Kupchikova, L. M. 1960. Nesting of bumblebees in the Komi ASSR. (Transl. from Russian). Ent. Rev. 38: 484–490.Google Scholar
Levins, R. 1968. Evolution in changing environments. Princeton Univ. Press. 120 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, E. 1963. Animal species and evolution. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge. 797 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, R. S. 1969. Competition and species diversity. Brookhaven Symp. Biol. 22: 63–70.Google ScholarPubMed
Milliron, H. E. and Oliver, D. R.. 1966. Bumblebees from Northern Ellesmere Island, with observations on usurpation by Megabombus hyperboreus (Schönh.) (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Can. Ent. 98: 207–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, E. H. 1944. The prairie and associated vegetation of southwest Alberta. Can. J. Res. 22: 11–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, E. H. 1955. The vegetation of Alberta. Bot. Rev. 21: 493–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pielou, E. C. 1972. Niche width and niche overlap: a method for measuring them. Ecology 53: 687–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plath, O. E. 1934. Bumblebees and their ways. Macmillan, New York. 201 pp.Google Scholar
Postner, M. 1952. Biologisch Ökologische Untersuchungen an Hummeln und ihren Nestern. Vöreff. Mus. nat.-völk.-handl., Bremen. 2: 45–86.Google Scholar
Richards, O. W. 1927. The specific characters of the British humblebees (Hymenoptera). Trans. ent. Soc. Lond. 75: 233–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, K. W. 1973. Biology of Bombus polaris Curtis and B. hyperboreus Schönherr at Lake Hazen, Northwest Territories (Hymenoptera: Bombini). Quaest. ent. 9: 115–157.Google Scholar
Sabath, M. D. and Jones, J. M. 1973. Measurement of niche breadth and overlap: the Colwell-Futuyma method. Ecology 54: 1143–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakagami, S. F. and Nishijima, Y.. 1973. Two heterospecific colonies found in Japanese bumblebees, Bombus schrencki and B. pseudobaicalensis (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Res. Bull. Obihiro Zootech. Univ. 7: 628–631.Google Scholar
Shannon, C. E. and Weaver, W.. 1963. The mathematical theory of communication. Univ. Illinois Press, Urbana. 117 pp.Google Scholar
Siegel, S. 1956. Non parametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw Hill, New York. 312 pp.Google Scholar
Simpson, E. H. 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature 163: 688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skovgaard, O. S. 1936. Rødkløverens Bestøving, Humlebier og Humbleboer. K. danske. Vidensk. Selsk. Nat. ag. math Ser. 6. 140 pp.Google Scholar
Sladen, F. W. L. 1912. The humble-bee, its life history and how to domesticate it. Macmillan, London. 283 pp.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J.. 1969. Biometry, the principles and practise of statistics in biological research. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco. 776 pp.Google Scholar
Voveikov, G. S. 1953. Estestvennaya smena samok vo cem'ya sochmelej (Hymenoptera Bomb.). Ent. Obozr. 33: 174–184.Google Scholar
Wheeler, W. M. 1919. The parasitic aculeata, a study in evolution. Proc. Am. phil. Soc. 58: 1–40.Google Scholar
Yarrow, I. H. H. 1970. Is Bombus inexpectatus (Tkalcu.) a workerless obligate parasite? (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Insectes Soc. 17: 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar