Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T01:30:03.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE NEARCTIC SPECIES OF PERILISSUS (HYMENOPTERA, ICHNEUMONIDAE, CTENOPELMATINAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

John R. Barron
John R. Barron
Affiliation:
Centre for Land and Biological Resources Research, Agriculture Canada, Research Branch, Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Nearctic members of the genus Perilissus Holmgren, parasites of various species of sawflies on coniferous and deciduous trees and shrubs, were revised. There are 17 species of which 10 were described as new. These were placed in six species groups as follows: the discolor group composed of P. concavus, P. impunctatus, P. gilvus, P. triangularis, P. galbipes, P. rutilus spp.nov., and P. discolor (Cresson); the araius group comprising P. araius Burks and P. helvus sp.nov.; the coloradensis group composed of P. coloradensis (Ashmead) and P. spatulatus sp.nov.; the anatinus group consisting of P. anatinus sp.nov.; the bicolor group including P. bicolor (Cresson), P. townesi Burks, and P. cancellatus sp.nov.; and the concolor group comprising P. concolor (Cresson) and P. decoloratus (Cresson). Relationships of the genus Perilissus with other genera within the tribe Perilissini were discussed. Also, presumed relationships of the species groups and species of Perilissus were interpreted.

Résumé

L’auteur révise les membres néarctiques du genre Perilissus Holmgren qui parasitent diverses espèces de mouches-à-scies. Parmi les 17 espèces décrites, 10 sont nouvelle à la science. Elles sont réparties en six groupes d’espèces comme suit : le groupe discolor qui comprend P. concavus, P. impunctatus, P. gilvus, P. triangularis, P. galbipes, P. rutilus spp.nov. et de P. discolor (Cresson); le groupe araius formé de P. araius Burks et de P. helvus sp.nov.; le groupe coloradensis composé de P. coloradensis (Ashmead) et de P. spatulatus sp.nov.; le groupe anatinus où l’on retrouve P. anatinus sp.nov.; le groupe bicolor qui inclus P. bicolor (Cresson), P. townesi Burks et P. cancellatus sp.nov.; finalement, le groupe concolor comprenant P. concolor (Cresson) et P. decoloratus (Cresson). On discute des liens entre le genre Perilissus et les autres genres de la tribu des Perilissini. Une interprétation des relations possibles chez les groupes d’espèces est également présentée.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 124 , Issue 2 , April 1992 , pp. 211 - 272
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, R.T., and Ball, G.E.. 1980. Synopsis of Mexican taxa of the Loxandrus series (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Pterostichini). Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 105: 481–575.Google Scholar
Ashmead, W.H. 1896. Descriptions of new parasitic Hymenoptera. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 23: 179–234.Google Scholar
Burks, B.D. 1952. A review of the Nearctic genera of the tribe Mesoleiini with descriptions of two new genera and a revision of the Nearctic species of Perilissus and Labrossyta (Hymenoptera-Ichneumonidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 45: 94–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, R.W. 1979. Family Ichneumonidae. pp. 315–741in Krombein, K.V., Hurd, P.D. Jr, Smith, D.R., and Burk, B.D. (Eds.), Catalog of Hymenoptera in America North of Mexico. Vol. 1. Symphyta and Apocrita (Parasitica). Smithsonian Inst. Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Cresson, E.T. 1864. Descriptions of North American Hymenoptera in the collection of the Entomological Society of Philadelphia. Proc. ent. Soc. Philadelphia 3: 257–321.Google Scholar
Davis, G.C. 1898. A review of the ichneumonid subfamily Tryphoninae. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 24: 193–348 (1897).Google Scholar
Foerster, A. 1868. Synopsis der Familien und Gattungen der Ichneumonen. Naturah. Ver. Rheinlande Verh. 25: 135–221.Google Scholar
Gabriel, K.R. 1978. A simple method for multiple comparison of means. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 73: 724–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochberg, Y. 1974. Some generalizations of the T-method in simultaneous inference. J. Multivar. Anal. 4: 224–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmgren, A.E. 1856. Forsoktill uppstalning ochbeskrifning af de i Sverigefaunna Tryphonides. Svenska Vetensk. Acad. Handl. 75.1, 1855, 1, pp. 93–246; 1, 1856, 2, pp. 305–394.Google Scholar
McKnight, M.E. 1974. Parasitoids of the western spruce budworm in Colorado. Environ. Ent. 3(1): 186–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Provancher, L. 1875. Les ichneumonides de Québec. Naturaliste can. 7: 138–149.Google Scholar
Provancher, L. 1879. Faune canadienne. Les insectes-Hyménoptères. Naturaliste can. 11: 205–233.Google Scholar
Provancher, L. 1882. Faune canadienne. Hyménoptères. Additions et corrections. Naturaliste can. 13: 353–368.Google Scholar
Provancher, L. 1886. Additions et corrections à la faune Hyménoptèrologique de la province de Québec. Fam. IV. Ichneumonides. C. Darveau, Québec. pp. 29–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, S.N. 1953. On a collection of Indian Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera) in the Forest Research Institute, Dehra Dun. Indian For. Res., Delhi (N.S.) Ent. 8: 159–225.Google Scholar
Richards, O.W. 1977. Hymenoptera. Introduction and key to families. In Watson, A. (Ed.), Handbooks for the Identification of British Insects, 2nd ed. 6 (1). Royal Entomological Society of London.Google Scholar
Seyrig, A. 1936. Mission scientifique de l'Omo. Hymenoptera. II. Ichneumonidae: Cryptinae, Pimplinae, Tryphoninae et Ophioninae. Mém. Mus. Hist. nat. Paris 4: 1–100.Google Scholar
Sokal, R.R., and Rohlf, F.J.. 1981. Biometry. The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, 2nd ed. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
Townes, H.K. 1945. A catalogue and reclassification of the Nearctic Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera). Part II. The subfamilies Mesoleiinae, Plectiscinae, Orthocentrinae, Diplazontinae, Metopiinae, Ophioninae, Mesochorinae. Mem. Am. ent. Soc. 11(2): 478–925.Google Scholar
Townes, H.K. 1970. The genera of Ichneumonidae, Part 3. Mem. Am. ent. Inst. (Ann Arbor) 36 (1969).Google Scholar